Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

944 deserve a porsche name?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2002, 06:33 PM
  #31  
jason1972
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
jason1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: central california
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

944s are awsome cars but 911s are just better cars..thats why it keeps its resale value..more in demand since thus keeps its resale value. another reason is that they still make 911's while 944s were discontinued over 10yrs ago.

but i still love my 944!
Old 11-05-2002, 09:19 PM
  #32  
exc911ence
Three Wheelin'
 
exc911ence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 1,700
Received 42 Likes on 25 Posts
Post

There are many 356 owners that still don't think the 911 series are real Porsches... some people can be so stubborn.

Think this kind of elitist crap happens between Ferrari owners? "Your 355 Spyder is not a real Ferrari because real Ferrari's are V-12's", "Oh yeah, well your Testarossa isn't a real Ferrari because real Ferrari's have their V-12's in the front!" I can feel their pain from here...
Old 11-05-2002, 10:24 PM
  #33  
M Danger
Three Wheelin'
 
M Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Centennial Colorado
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

[quote]Originally posted by jason1972:
<strong>944s are awsome cars but 911s are just better cars..
but i still love my 944!</strong><hr></blockquote>

Thats total BS <img src="graemlins/cussing.gif" border="0" alt="[grrrrrrr]" />
The 911 is a status symbol, the reson the 911 has so much development behind it is because they had to fix so much crap from a poor design.
The first exmple is the rear engine. (read this in a mocking voice): Hmmm lets see the engine is aircooled... cars move forward... Lets put it in the back YEAH! good idea...(now giving you the retarded look) <img src="graemlins/oops.gif" border="0" alt="[oops]" />

The reason the 911 is still around it because people are stupid and weakminded, they worry too much about what every one else thinks, hey you gotta be Cool "dude"
<img src="graemlins/nono.gif" border="0" alt="[nono]" />
Old 11-06-2002, 01:56 AM
  #34  
Eurocarguy
Track Day
 
Eurocarguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I know my 90 944 Cab is a real Porsche. Its 1990 window sticker is as much as a new Boxster today. And I'm pretty sure that everyone considers a Boxster a Porsche.

While I was researching the purchase of my 944 a few years ago, I read that the 1989 Turbo S was the fastest production car Porsche made until 1996. Is this true?
Old 11-06-2002, 07:25 AM
  #35  
jason1972
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
jason1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: central california
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

no, the fastest production porsche made until 1996 was the 911 turbo.
Old 11-06-2002, 09:46 AM
  #36  
Sajid
Racer
 
Sajid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Another Rennlister emailed this to me. Dont know where he got it from, but hearing it from Ferdinand himself might put the topic of this thread to rest.

A letter from Dr. Porsche himself. Written in the early 80's when the 944 was first released.

944


My family, beginning with my father, has been designing and building cars for over 80 years.
At first, we worked for other companies. "But always," my father said, "there were too many compromises." So we formed Porsche -to build Porsches. To our family's own standards. Without compromise. Our very first Porsche was the 356. Now there is a new Porsche: the 944. The 944 has a new 2.5-liter, 4-cylinder, aluminum-silicon alloy Porsche engine - designed at Weissach, and built at Zuffenhausen. It achieves maximum torque at 137.1 ft-lbs as early as 3000 rpm, and produces 143 hp at 5500 rpm. On the track, the 944 accelerates from 0 to 50 mph in 5.9 seconds. And it reaches the 1/4-mile mark from a standing start in only 6.2 seconds at a speed of 84 mph. Its maximum speed: 130 mph. The 944 has the Porsche transaxle design - proven at Le Mans, and refined for everyday driving. It produces a nearly-perfect 50-50 front-to-rear weight distribution for balanced braking and improved cornering. The 944's aerodynamic styling reduces air resistance and improves road holding. In fact, as a result of its total design efficiency, the 944 requires only 28 hp to cruise at 55 mph. To my family, the 944 is more than a new car. it is a new and true Porsche.
At Porsche, excellence is expected.


Dr. F. Porsche
Stuttgart
Old 11-06-2002, 10:59 AM
  #37  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Post

[quote]Originally posted by jason1972:
<strong>944s are awsome cars but 911s are just better cars..thats why it keeps its resale value..more in demand since thus keeps its resale value. another reason is that they still make 911's while 944s were discontinued over 10yrs ago.

but i still love my 944!</strong><hr></blockquote>

Remember the 944 was designed to replace the 924 which was designed to replace the 914. Honestly these are entry level Porsches. From the beginning the 911 was the Line's Flagship road car. By design the 911 in all years produced was "better" than a the same year 944 just as the 996 is "better" than the boxster. The 944 Turbo is different story since it actually competed quite nicely with the 911 Turbo of its day.

The 911 is uniquly Porsche. Always has been and always will be. The 944 has a semi-basterized history due to the VW involvement. It looks like many other cars on the road (eg Toyota supra, RX7 because they copied the shape) and was a signifianct departure from the more traditional Porsches. It was designed and developed by Porsche and therefore it is one.
Obviously resale value of the cars is driven by their performance in small part and by perception in large part. To me their low value is not problem rather it is blessing as it allows me and my parents to own the following..

84 944 - Family Pristince Show Car & Multiple concour Winner
84-944 - My Race Car for 944-spec
86 944 Turbo - Dad's Street/Track Car
88 944 Turbo S - My Street Car
91 928 S4 - Momma's Grand Touring Car Extrodinare!

All this for less than the cost of 1 New Boxster S!

If the watercooled front engine line held their value owning these cars would not be possible.
To me low value means plenty of cheap cars for the real enthusaists to own, drive, and enjoy.

Also the factory has not made a 911 in years.
The last 911 was produce in 1989 model year. After that came the 964 & 993 revisions to the basic car, but still carried much of the feel and body shell of the original.

Now the 996 is produced that only a 911 because Porsche feels it will sell better as "911" rather than a 996.
Old 11-06-2002, 12:22 PM
  #38  
billybones
Burning Brakes
 
billybones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Utica Michigan
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The 911 is an overpriced VW bug..with some modifications..IF you disagree, please lists the differences. On both sides, this is for my own benefit before I purchase one or the other. am looking currently for a 951.. make me believe I need to overspend on a 911/bug?
Old 11-06-2002, 12:27 PM
  #39  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Post

[quote]Originally posted by billybones:
<strong>The 911 is an overpriced VW bug..with some modifications..IF you disagree, please lists the differences.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Hundereds if not thousands of RACE WINS!
The 911 (and derivatives) is the most sucessfull production based race car in the history of the world! <img src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" border="0" alt="[cheers]" />
Old 11-06-2002, 12:31 PM
  #40  
billybones
Burning Brakes
 
billybones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Utica Michigan
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

That explains the cadiliac sts.
Old 11-06-2002, 12:37 PM
  #41  
billybones
Burning Brakes
 
billybones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Utica Michigan
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I am well aware of the 911 history. And current status.. was just trying to point out that the VW concept is one and the same.. actually the dream of ferdinand before hitler MADE him do it.. 356 was the result of it... THanks for the reply though
Old 11-06-2002, 02:10 PM
  #42  
924RACR
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
924RACR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 3,976
Received 73 Likes on 58 Posts
Post

M758 - you get the discussion around to an interesting point: the 928 was developed to be the replacement for the 911 as the top-of-the-line car. Problem was that the 911 was too successful (to simplify the issue) at that point, and all the people who could afford the top car wanted what they, new and previous Porsche owners alike, felt was a "real" Porsche - certainly not a heavy (relative to the 911) front-engine water-cooled car so closely related to the entry-level 944! Not exclusive enough! Won't match my gold chains!!! <img src="graemlins/soapbox.gif" border="0" alt="[soapbox]" />

So Porsche was effectively financially blackmailed into continuing with the 911 - in a tribute to the abilities of my German counterparts, a triumph of German bloody-minded-ness over basic physics - until the very recent years, where they finally (in spite of massive uproar) managed to get the 911 water-cooled, out of sheer necessity for emissions. Of course, they had to spend stupid amounts of time and money to make it look, drive, and sound like the same old car. Even so they got blasted in the press because it was different - drove too tamely... &lt;/rant&gt;
Old 11-06-2002, 03:03 PM
  #43  
Silverbullet951
Race Car
 
Silverbullet951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

To tell you the truth, Ferdinand Porsche DiD design the VW bug. I would be surprised if he had the same thoughts when he was thinking of the 911.
Old 11-06-2002, 04:11 PM
  #44  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Post

Don't forget that the 944 Turbo was ALSO designated to replace the 911, but for the same reasons as Vaughan said it did not happen.

BTW... The 928 is the greatest GT car ever made and the 911 is probably the greatest sports car/production based race car ever made...
and the 944... one of the best handling cars ever made.


And you wonder why Porsches are Legendary! <img src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" border="0" alt="[cheers]" />



Quick Reply: 944 deserve a porsche name?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:33 PM.