Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

944S2 3.0L Compression Test Results - Are these low?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2012, 04:45 PM
  #1  
ron.eddy
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
ron.eddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 944S2 3.0L Compression Test Results - Are these low?

Out of curiosity I hooked up my compression tester today to my healthy 1990 944S2 Cabriolet and found the following:

Mileage: 134,371
Test: Engine at operating temperature, dry test
Cylinder #1: 191 psi
Cylinder #2: 189 psi
Cylinder #3: 186 psi
Cylinder #4: 194 psi

The engine pulls well and I'm happy with it but it seems everyone else who has posted results on this model engine gets 210+ psi in each cylinder. Does this just mean my engine is wearing down? 134k doesn't seem like a TON of miles on such a well maintained engine... What kind of effect would this have on horsepower do you think? I assume the only thing I could do anyway would be a rebuild, which I won't be doing, but I am curious nonetheless what others have to say.

Thanks!
Old 05-20-2012, 05:04 PM
  #2  
Reimu
Drifting
 
Reimu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NC Triad
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Sounds fine to me really
Old 05-20-2012, 05:22 PM
  #3  
john durdin
Advanced
 
john durdin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ottawa canada
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They are excellent ,You couldn,t ask for better at that mileage.
Old 05-20-2012, 05:51 PM
  #4  
Dougs951
Rennlist Member
 
Dougs951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 3,792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Those look fantastic.
Old 05-20-2012, 06:08 PM
  #5  
ron.eddy
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
ron.eddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am not an engine guy, clearly, and this car has been running so well lately its starting to make me paranoid, hence the unnecessary checking and worrying haha. I should drive it instead of trying to find issues lol. Thanks all!
Old 05-21-2012, 06:31 AM
  #6  
peanut
Burning Brakes
 
peanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Somerset UK
Posts: 1,152
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

they are really good results particularly as all the cylinders have comparable compression results.
Old 05-21-2012, 08:41 AM
  #7  
ktel
Instructor
 
ktel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 151
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

What are the reference values for all the 944 variants regarding the compression results ? Is there a table or something similar ?
Old 05-21-2012, 01:20 PM
  #8  
ron.eddy
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
ron.eddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ktel
What are the reference values for all the 944 variants regarding the compression results ? Is there a table or something similar ?
In my further research I have discovered that the absolute values are not very valuable because there are far too many variables to be able to compare accurately. The more important part is that all the numbers are within a small range, which mine happen to be. It would appear that if one is concerned with the engine needing a rebuild a leakdown test would be preferred. Even then though you are dealing with relative values (in that case percentages) which are not easily compared against any sort of benchmark.

That was what I have gathered...
Old 05-21-2012, 06:57 PM
  #9  
peanut
Burning Brakes
 
peanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Somerset UK
Posts: 1,152
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ron.eddy
In my further research I have discovered that the absolute values are not very valuable because there are far too many variables to be able to compare accurately. The more important part is that all the numbers are within a small range, which mine happen to be. It would appear that if one is concerned with the engine needing a rebuild a leakdown test would be preferred. Even then though you are dealing with relative values (in that case percentages) which are not easily compared against any sort of benchmark.

That was what I have gathered...
couldn't have put it better Ron.
Old 05-21-2012, 08:06 PM
  #10  
dillon410021
Race Car
 
dillon410021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LaPorte, IN 46350
Posts: 3,835
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

good results. what you are looking for is that the numbers are close to each other which the are.



Quick Reply: 944S2 3.0L Compression Test Results - Are these low?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:27 AM.