question about new flywheel vs. old flywheel
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
question about new flywheel vs. old flywheel
so i bought a fidanza flywheel to take some of the weight off but i've got a question about it. i notice that the old flywheel has teeth but the new one has none. is there a significance to the teeth and the resulting space? is the space what the reference sensor uses? also, on the new flywheel, there's a little black allen bolt. any idea what this is for? you can see the space in the teeth on the old flywheel and the allen bolt on the side of the new flywheel in the photo.
#2
The old flywheel should of had that little bolt, at least mine did. I might have something to do with the sensors, but I know it must be pointing straight down when you install everything. I don't know why, but I just followed the procedures.
#3
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok, good to know. i will point mine straight downward then too although i'm not sure why that matters. the old flywheel didn't have that allen bolt
#5
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: question about new flywheel vs. old flywheel
Originally posted by dualblade
i notice that the old flywheel has teeth but the new one has none. is there a significance to the teeth and the resulting space? is the space what the reference sensor uses? also, on the new flywheel, there's a little black allen bolt. any idea what this is for? you can see the space in the teeth on the old flywheel and the allen bolt on the side of the new flywheel in the photo.
i notice that the old flywheel has teeth but the new one has none. is there a significance to the teeth and the resulting space? is the space what the reference sensor uses? also, on the new flywheel, there's a little black allen bolt. any idea what this is for? you can see the space in the teeth on the old flywheel and the allen bolt on the side of the new flywheel in the photo.
Rob
#6
Both my 968 and 944S flywheels have the same number of teeth (both 16 valves), I've never checked the three NA's I've owned. I've been told I can use the 944S flywheel with my 968 engine, I'm doing a swap. I suspect you need a different flywheel.
Mike
Mike
#7
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
THE LIGHTWEIGHT FLYWHEEL YOU HAVE IS NOT FOR AN S2, it's for either a turbo or 8 valve NA car. The allen head bolt is responsible for the pulse from the reference sensor.
Trending Topics
#10
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ugh, that sucks. so there's no way i can use this with my car then. does fidanza make a lightweight flywheel for my car? i spoke to the guy who supposedly designed the fidanza lightweight for the 944 and he said this would be the one for the car.
#11
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
That thing wont work. I hate to contradict the designer, but it just plain wont. The DME is looking for those tooth-driven signals and it wont happen w/ the aluminum one.
#12
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Matt Sheppard
That thing wont work. I hate to contradict the designer, but it just plain wont. The DME is looking for those tooth-driven signals and it wont happen w/ the aluminum one.
That thing wont work. I hate to contradict the designer, but it just plain wont. The DME is looking for those tooth-driven signals and it wont happen w/ the aluminum one.