Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

951 clutch replacement question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2016, 12:01 AM
  #16  
Humboldtgrin
Drifting
 
Humboldtgrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Posts: 2,268
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

It's easy because it's an 89T. 88turbo S have the same style two piece crossover. There the best stock style crossover, I like the one piece header collector. My 86 crossover broke a header flange off and put a hairline split down the wastegate runner from warping. A two piece crossover relieves the stress on the wastegate over the 86 crossover. The 87 and 88 crossover are a two piece but still have a two piece header connection and the wastegate tie in is backwards in regards to airflow connection. The 88TS/89T crossover corrected these issues. Looks like Lart has just what you should get. Just don't forget new gaskets. I agree and disagree with LR two piece crossover. I love the idea. But because of the meterial used it will crack in the future. Not maybe, it will. I have an 87 crossover with there early style band clamp setup. It was cracked 1/4 around both welds. It because SS doesn't weld well to incolnel. And more connections means more areas to possibly leak from. I would go with SFR two (three w/wastgate tie in) piece crossover if replacing the stock unit to upgrade to that design. Althou he should use a one piece header flange at least and 1/2" think flanges and possibly a 321ss upgrade option but then that gets real pricey.
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item...obalID=EBAY-US

Last edited by Humboldtgrin; 02-25-2016 at 12:17 AM.
Old 02-25-2016, 02:40 AM
  #17  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,436
Received 88 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

10% off for rennlist members
Old 02-25-2016, 02:56 AM
  #18  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,436
Received 88 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

this is the dreaded 1pc crossover is actually so rare that is more expensive than the 89 TS 2pc, Iam not the seller

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Porsche-944-...tV-iRZ&vxp=mtr
Old 02-25-2016, 07:38 AM
  #19  
FRporscheman
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
FRporscheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco Area
Posts: 11,014
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 944hal
I had enough clearance to remove the bell housing and all the clutch parts, including the flywheel. I did remove the intake so I had extra room to get to the reference sensor bracket and the two upper bell housing bolts. The starter and clutch slave also had to come off, but that should be obvious. The worst was pulling back the torque tube. I had to lower the torsion bar tube to get clearance, plus the transaxle cross member needs to come off.
Is your car 1986 or 1987+?
Old 02-25-2016, 10:26 AM
  #20  
Rokket
Rennlist Member
 
Rokket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Lindsey Crossover Pipe Kit: 89 TS

I have had the Lindsey 3- Piece (Actually Modified 2-Piece) on my car for almost 5-years and have at least 200 Races and could not even calculate how many DE's. The ONLY problem that I had with the Lindsey set was the bolts in the flange, had to drill them out & install 12.9 w/ Stover nuts on the back sides.

I bought my cross over pipe from LART and had it shipped directly to Lindsey for the modification. I own the Engine Lab (www.EngineLabofTampa.com) and have installed a bunch of these without any reported issues.

Removing the intake is a breeze, but the 4- bolt/nut configuration on the Turbo is absolutely dreadful! I took the time and Stage 8'd all of the bolts on the turbo down pipe so that (Hopefully) I never had to remove them again. Another thing that I did was drill out all of the 6-mm bolts and upgrade them to 8mm with Stover nuts.

I did break that little wastegate elbow at the 48-Hours this year, but was able to get it welded locally w/ 304SS.

Old 02-25-2016, 10:55 AM
  #21  
944hal
Pro
 
944hal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My car is of many years :-). The crossover is a single piece from the original '87 motor. To be exact, the body is an '89 S2, with a 951 Turbo motor. Not sure the actual year of the motor, only that's it's not a Turbo S. The torque tube is out of an '89 Turbo S as is the transaxle. Most of the suspension components are from the original "87 T supplemented with different struts and bushings.
Old 02-25-2016, 11:15 AM
  #22  
Rokket
Rennlist Member
 
Rokket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 87 vs 89 944 Turbo

Since you upgraded your trans to the TS which is an AOR, that is really other than the k26/8 major difference between the 2- models. My car is set up as a Turbo Cup since 1990, and uses the 86 boxes with PMNA factory chips
Old 02-25-2016, 01:01 PM
  #23  
mytrplseven
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
mytrplseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Orlando area
Posts: 2,654
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Humboldtgrin
It's easy because it's an 89T. 88turbo S have the same style two piece crossover. There the best stock style crossover, I like the one piece header collector. My 86 crossover broke a header flange off and put a hairline split down the wastegate runner from warping. A two piece crossover relieves the stress on the wastegate over the 86 crossover. The 87 and 88 crossover are a two piece but still have a two piece header connection and the wastegate tie in is backwards in regards to airflow connection. The 88TS/89T crossover corrected these issues. Looks like Lart has just what you should get. Just don't forget new gaskets. I agree and disagree with LR two piece crossover. I love the idea. But because of the meterial used it will crack in the future. Not maybe, it will. I have an 87 crossover with there early style band clamp setup. It was cracked 1/4 around both welds. It because SS doesn't weld well to incolnel. And more connections means more areas to possibly leak from. I would go with SFR two (three w/wastgate tie in) piece crossover if replacing the stock unit to upgrade to that design. Althou he should use a one piece header flange at least and 1/2" think flanges and possibly a 321ss upgrade option but then that gets real pricey.
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item...obalID=EBAY-US
Are you saying that I should replace my '86 crossover with one from an '88 or '89? If so, is there anything else that needs to be modded while it's being re-installed?
Old 02-25-2016, 08:26 PM
  #24  
944hal
Pro
 
944hal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Other than the turbo S trans, I running a stock 26/6 with a custom chip. Motor is mostly stock. Crank and rods are balanced and I just added the Michael Mount rod bearing modification. Also have a crank scraper. Car is light, 2,550 lbs without me. Running in PCA SP3. Should not have any problem making weight. Heck, I might be the only turbo left in SP3.
Old 02-27-2016, 03:40 AM
  #25  
FRporscheman
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
FRporscheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco Area
Posts: 11,014
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 944hal
My car is of many years :-). The crossover is a single piece from the original '87 motor. To be exact, the body is an '89 S2, with a 951 Turbo motor. Not sure the actual year of the motor, only that's it's not a Turbo S. The torque tube is out of an '89 Turbo S as is the transaxle. Most of the suspension components are from the original "87 T supplemented with different struts and bushings.
Then that's why you didn't need to remove the crossover pipe to do your clutch. Only the '86 1-piece crossover pipe interferes with the bellhousing. The 87+ pipes are 2-piece.


OP: I'd recommend putting in an 87+ pipe if you can get one. I just recently learned that the TS version has a stronger header collector flange (1 flange instead of 2), so that would be even better.
Old 02-27-2016, 08:45 PM
  #26  
944hal
Pro
 
944hal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FRPorscheman,
My crossover is a single piece Bolts to the headers, waste gate and turbo.
Old 02-27-2016, 10:39 PM
  #27  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 533 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

I've replaced the clutch on my 86 several times without removing the cross-over. My '86 is actually a fairly early one, yet it still came with the updated cross-over pipe, so those early versions must be fairly rare.
Old 02-29-2016, 04:24 AM
  #28  
FRporscheman
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
FRporscheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco Area
Posts: 11,014
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Just so we're clear

Here is an early one-piece:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Porsche-944-...tV-iRZ&vxp=mtr

Here is a late two-piece:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Porsche-944-...item3d115680b5

No affiliation.

I didn't know the change was made mid-86, interesting.
Old 02-29-2016, 11:52 AM
  #29  
mytrplseven
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
mytrplseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Orlando area
Posts: 2,654
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default Lindsey 2 pc crossover pipe

This is where I'm confused:

Lindsey 2 pc conversion doesn't look anything like what I would consider a 2 pc crossover pipe that makes changing the clutch without pulling the crossover a certainty.
Attached Images  
Old 02-29-2016, 12:12 PM
  #30  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,007
Received 88 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

The "two piece" only has to do with the little pipe that goes to the wastegate. The one-piece pipe has a longer little pipe that connects directly to the wastegate, as opposed to the coupling and slip flange...


Quick Reply: 951 clutch replacement question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:38 AM.