Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

‘79 on the dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2024, 03:56 PM
  #1  
wopfe
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
wopfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 537
Received 75 Likes on 39 Posts
Default ‘79 on the dyno results

We went to a place that has a dyno with the Dutch 928 club and did a testrun. 223 horse and 372 nm. Anybody that has a clue what these numbers mean? For me it sounds pretty good, it’s 17 horse less then factory and actually 22 more nm torque! 45 years old car?


Last edited by wopfe; 04-08-2024 at 02:22 AM.
The following 5 users liked this post by wopfe:
79NINE28 (04-08-2024), belgiumbarry (04-08-2024), Brent A. (04-08-2024), Darklands (04-08-2024), RennHarry (04-07-2024)
Old 04-07-2024, 04:23 PM
  #2  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,460
Received 2,077 Likes on 1,186 Posts
Default

Did they give you the actual chart? Does it show which correction factor was used?
Automatic or manual?
Which gear did you use?
Oil / Coolant / trans fluids all up to operating temp?
How many pulls did you do?
Does your 928 have any mods?

Chassis dyno's measure power at the wheels, most folks use 15% for manual, 20% for automatic as the power loss through the drivetrain. Using this formula for a manual would be 204hp. But the correction factor used (SAE, STD, uncorrected etc..) can drastically change the number.

The most important use of such numbers is if you plan on modifying the car and do an after dyno on the same dyno and note the differences.
Old 04-07-2024, 05:14 PM
  #3  
wopfe
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
wopfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 537
Received 75 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Did they give you the actual chart? Does it show which correction factor was used?

All new to me! See the picture of the chart!


Automatic or manual?

manual


Which gear did you use?

I think 2th and 4th


Oil / Coolant / trans fluids all up to operating temp?

yes


How many pulls did you do?

3, last one full throttle.


Does your 928 have any mods?

Bone stock euro





Last edited by wopfe; 04-07-2024 at 05:15 PM.
Old 04-07-2024, 09:06 PM
  #4  
Mrmerlin
Team Owner
 
Mrmerlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philly PA
Posts: 27,939
Received 2,283 Likes on 1,265 Posts
Default

thats some beautiful paint on your car
The following users liked this post:
wopfe (04-08-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 02:44 AM
  #5  
belgiumbarry
Three Wheelin'
 
belgiumbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,452
Received 183 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

any idea of AFR ?
you could be on the "rich" side , good for torque , less for HP.
Old 04-08-2024, 05:15 AM
  #6  
wopfe
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
wopfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 537
Received 75 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

@belgiumbarry yeah, that i what I was wondering, if some experienced dyno/tuning guys know what the numbers translate to tuning wise. I tuned the car myself (with a lot off help from this lovely forum) and got it to run "good" with a CO meter a while ago. So this might be just a bit too rich, could make sense!

Last edited by wopfe; 04-09-2024 at 12:00 PM.
The following users liked this post:
belgiumbarry (04-08-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 11:14 AM
  #7  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,460
Received 2,077 Likes on 1,186 Posts
Default

There's some good info across the bottom of that chart, trying to decipher it.

Bottom line is this, you have a absolutely beautiful 928 and just looking at the chart, it's very healthy. The actual numbers are really not all that important unless you plan on making modifications and tracking the changes.

The US cars at least, can pick up some good power with a few more degrees of timing. That's where a dyno is really useful. Strap it down, warm it up, do a couple of pulls - add a degree - do a couple more pulls... rinse / repeat until you find that sweet spot in the power curve.
The following users liked this post:
wopfe (04-09-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 03:19 PM
  #8  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,101
Received 336 Likes on 200 Posts
Default

As I recall, dyno operators in Europe give you "corrected" crank numbers.

DIN correction? "CF Geen" of 1.032? (But "geen" means "no" in Dutch.)

But the "Driveline eff(%)" of 92% is too optimistic? Estimated from roll-down? Should be more like 85%?

Only difference ROW vs. USA, 78-79 is EGR? Cams are the same.

Last edited by PorKen; 04-08-2024 at 03:22 PM.
The following users liked this post:
hacker-pschorr (04-08-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 04:36 PM
  #9  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,460
Received 2,077 Likes on 1,186 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
Only difference ROW vs. USA, 78-79 is EGR? Cams are the same.
I thought 78-79 Euro didn't have CATS.
The following users liked this post:
PorKen (04-08-2024)
Old 04-09-2024, 03:02 AM
  #10  
belgiumbarry
Three Wheelin'
 
belgiumbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,452
Received 183 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
As I recall, dyno operators in Europe give you "corrected" crank numbers.

DIN correction? "CF Geen" of 1.032? (But "geen" means "no" in Dutch.)

But the "Driveline eff(%)" of 92% is too optimistic? Estimated from roll-down? Should be more like 85%?

Only difference ROW vs. USA, 78-79 is EGR? Cams are the same.
yes, those are crank numbers , and driveline loss is normaly measured during roll-down.

Torque is in NM , not ft-lb. Also the scales used on the chart are so that it is as "visual" presented as possible.

This was my latest run with the C2





same chart but in FT-lb and scales that the cross point is at 5250 rpm ( some prefer this )





last time i went with the 928 , it was way to rich and had no jets to change.... i also mounted foam air filters on the Webers which the engine was eating away !
All changed now , almost ready for a new dyno test





Last edited by belgiumbarry; 04-09-2024 at 04:00 AM.
The following 4 users liked this post by belgiumbarry:
booch (04-11-2024), Darklands (04-09-2024), PK68 (04-09-2024), wopfe (04-09-2024)
Old 04-09-2024, 12:06 PM
  #11  
wopfe
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
wopfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 537
Received 75 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hacker-pschorr
There's some good info across the bottom of that chart, trying to decipher it.

Bottom line is this, you have a absolutely beautiful 928 and just looking at the chart, it's very healthy. The actual numbers are really not all that important unless you plan on making modifications and tracking the changes.

The US cars at least, can pick up some good power with a few more degrees of timing. That's where a dyno is really useful. Strap it down, warm it up, do a couple of pulls - add a degree - do a couple more pulls... rinse / repeat until you find that sweet spot in the power curve.
Hi, not really any plans…it was a nice thing organized by the Dutch 928 club. The guy from the dyno was impressed. Normally the club groups are bragging upfront and claiming to have the most powerfull cars. This group was very modest but the results were good or even better then expected

I might do some further tuning and keep in mind these numbers and the idea of Barry that it might be a bit rich…but it runs fine and don’t want to mess up things…
Old 04-09-2024, 12:48 PM
  #12  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,460
Received 2,077 Likes on 1,186 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by belgiumbarry
yes, those are crank numbers , and driveline loss is normaly measured during roll-down.
Ah, that makes sense. One of the dyno's in town here can do that, I haven't played with it and they typically only do wheel power for customers.

Originally Posted by belgiumbarry
This was my latest run with the C2
Holy Cow, what did you do to that engine?
Old 04-09-2024, 02:45 PM
  #13  
belgiumbarry
Three Wheelin'
 
belgiumbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,452
Received 183 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hacker-pschorr
Ah, that makes sense. One of the dyno's in town here can do that, I haven't played with it and they typically only do wheel power for customers.


Holy Cow, what did you do to that engine?
this one has a ( 2006/7 ) 540 Merlin engine with the oem Tripower on it. A guy ( RIP ) in Arizona build it that way ( with a 6 gear Richmond gearbox )
I bought that car in Germany , at a dealer who imported it.
Had a lot of work in wrenching and tuning it , but finaly it works fine. ( Engine , coilover suspension, R&P steering etc... )
Here it runned to rich , meanwhile i corrected this and think there is 500 HP.
But as it is our "cruiser" i won't do no more dyno pulls as gearbox and ( oem ) diff can't handle that torque on paper.
It's a monster going on the pedal !



The following users liked this post:
RennHarry (04-09-2024)
Old 04-09-2024, 02:47 PM
  #14  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,460
Received 2,077 Likes on 1,186 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by belgiumbarry
this one has a ( 2006/7 ) 540 Merlin engine with the oem Tripower on it. A guy ( RIP ) in Arizona build it that way ( with a 6 gear Richmond gearbox )
I bought that car in Germany , at a dealer who imported it.
Had a lot of work in wrenching and tuning it , but finaly it works fine. ( Engine , coilover suspension, R&P steering etc... )
Here it runned to rich , meanwhile i corrected this and think there is 500 HP.
But as it is our "cruiser" i won't do no more dyno pulls as gearbox and ( oem ) diff can't handle that torque on paper.
It's a monster going on the pedal
That's badass. I grew up in the Corvette world, good friend has been restoring / racing them since the 70's. When "dyno days" started to become a club thing about 20 years ago, he would always talk the big block owners out of strapping their cars down since they would always be disappointed. As I'm sure you know. a 1967 435hp 427 was "gross" HP and they'd be lucky to see 200-250 on a chassis dyno.
Old 04-09-2024, 02:57 PM
  #15  
belgiumbarry
Three Wheelin'
 
belgiumbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,452
Received 183 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hacker-pschorr
That's badass. I grew up in the Corvette world, good friend has been restoring / racing them since the 70's. When "dyno days" started to become a club thing about 20 years ago, he would always talk the big block owners out of strapping their cars down since they would always be disappointed. As I'm sure you know. a 1967 435hp 427 was "gross" HP and they'd be lucky to see 200-250 on a chassis dyno.
correct , i had a fresh rebuid "350 HP " '70 C3 years ago and on dyno ( on that same dyno ) had exactly 240 HP
That Merlin here now is called a "735 HP " ... probably 500 if tuning perfect .

But OK , i would love to have that HP/torque in my rally 928
The following users liked this post:
hacker-pschorr (04-09-2024)



Quick Reply: ‘79 on the dyno results



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:57 PM.