Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Telltale Signs of Auto to Manual Conversion..?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2016, 01:10 AM
  #1  
Mark R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mark R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Peachtree Corners, Georgia
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Default Telltale Signs of Auto to Manual Conversion..?

There's a very rough project S4 that I've been considering purchasing.
It's a five speed, but the VIN decoder lists it with an A28.12 transmission.
So I'm pretty much assuming that the decoder is just in error in this case.
But now I'm also wondering if by chance it was converted at some point.
Is there anything I can visually look for that would help confirm this?
I would really like to rule this out somehow, if possible.
The option code sticker in the rear hatch is missing...
I didn't see any PRNDL indicator on the gauge cluster...
Anyone have any ideas or suggestions..?
Old 12-20-2016, 01:39 AM
  #2  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,720
Received 674 Likes on 549 Posts
Default

The differences I am aware of are that the conversion requires the installation of the plate that carries the clutch release mechanism in the footwell [there may be residual signs of welding ] and the automatic chassis transmission tunnel is shaped differently [a bit wider] to accommodate the auto transaxle that would not fit in a manual variant chassis - whether that is visually obvious not so sure.

The visual display unit could be changed over so that is not a reliable indicator.

Rgds

Fred
Old 12-20-2016, 01:42 AM
  #3  
Kiln_Red
Three Wheelin'
 
Kiln_Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 1,394
Received 159 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Look for modifications at the firewall where it would be necessary to accommodate the master cylinder.
Old 12-20-2016, 01:48 AM
  #4  
Dave928S
Rennlist Member
 
Dave928S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 4,681
Received 64 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Check your engine number. An original auto car with that transmission should have an M28.42 motor, but if it was always a manual it should have an M28.41 ... assuming the motor wasn't also changed.
Old 12-20-2016, 02:02 AM
  #5  
Mark R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mark R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Peachtree Corners, Georgia
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FredR
The differences I am aware of are that the conversion requires the installation of the plate that carries the clutch release mechanism in the footwell [there may be residual signs of welding ] and the automatic chassis transmission tunnel is shaped differently [a bit wider] to accommodate the auto transaxle that would not fit in a manual variant chassis - whether that is visually obvious not so sure.

The visual display unit could be changed over so that is not a reliable indicator.

Rgds

Fred
So are you saying there's actually a different car body for manual and auto?
I didn't realize that. I would think that should be pretty easy to spot from underneath.
Old 12-20-2016, 02:04 AM
  #6  
Mark R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mark R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Peachtree Corners, Georgia
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kiln_Red
Look for modifications at the firewall where it would be necessary to accommodate the master cylinder.
Yes. I was planning to look closer for any cuts/welds that don't appear original.
Old 12-20-2016, 02:09 AM
  #7  
Mark R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mark R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Peachtree Corners, Georgia
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave928S
Check your engine number. An original auto car with that transmission should have an M28.42 motor, but if it was always a manual it should have an M28.41 ... assuming the motor wasn't also changed.
Ahh, yes. Good point. I will definitely check for that.
Interestingly, the VIN decoder also says it came with an M28.42.
It's impossible to know for sure if the motor was also changed.
But it will at least be one more data point, either way...
Old 12-20-2016, 02:20 AM
  #8  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,720
Received 674 Likes on 549 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark R.
So are you saying there's actually a different car body for manual and auto?
I didn't realize that. I would think that should be pretty easy to spot from underneath.
The automatics are not equipped with the plate that holds the clutch hydraulics. As I remember you have to view this/install it from the footwell side of the lower firewall. If you can get to this you might see signs that indicate it was fitted post factory [new paint/slightly different shade or non at all etc].

If you do a search of Rennlist you may find a photo of the auto chassis that has a different transmission tunnel configuration needed to accomodate the wider profile. Not exactly sure of where the difference is but presumably [?] would be most noticeable around where the torque converter sits.

Rgds

Fred
Old 12-20-2016, 02:22 AM
  #9  
Dave928S
Rennlist Member
 
Dave928S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 4,681
Received 64 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

The data will always show the motor to match the transmission it lists ... I've never seen a data mix up showing the wrong motor to go with a transmission.

If it really was originally an auto, and is a conversion, then you should still see that auto motor number, assuming they didn't also change the motor.

+ what Fred said.
Old 12-20-2016, 02:26 AM
  #10  
Mark R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mark R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Peachtree Corners, Georgia
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

...

Last edited by Mark R.; 12-20-2016 at 03:13 AM.
Old 12-20-2016, 03:10 AM
  #11  
Mark R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mark R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Peachtree Corners, Georgia
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

OK. Thanks. All good suggestions, and some good areas to check.
What about any items related to the electrical function, like harness or CE panel..?
I'm envisioning things that control the reverse lights, or the starter lock out, etc.
The main wiring harness surely must be different between the two configurations.
So would there be any unused electrical connectors I might find taped back?
Or, conversely, any extra/added wires I might find routed outside the harness?
Old 12-20-2016, 06:51 AM
  #12  
michaelathome
Race Car
 
michaelathome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chantilly VA
Posts: 4,458
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I am not too familiar with 928 manuals transmission cars but an auto will have a cooler and all of the hardlines running to the front of the car. Do manuals have the cooler as well?
Old 12-20-2016, 07:12 AM
  #13  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,720
Received 674 Likes on 549 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by michaelathome
I am not too familiar with 928 manuals transmission cars but an auto will have a cooler and all of the hardlines running to the front of the car. Do manuals have the cooler as well?
The GTS manual has a cooler but earlier models do not. Therein lies another potential clue- the auto transmission models have a smaller a/c condenser so that the auto tranny cooler sits above the condenser whereas the manual has a larger a/c condenser filling that void. That could also be changed out but it is not necessary to do so.

Rgds

Fred
Old 12-20-2016, 10:17 AM
  #14  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 337 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Check the gauge cluster for the auto gear selector lights. It's an expensive part to swap and some left them as is after the conversion. The neutral relay jumper in the CE panel might not be a factory part either (OE is a copper stamped strip shaped like a "Z".
Old 12-20-2016, 09:52 PM
  #15  
Mark R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mark R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Peachtree Corners, Georgia
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FredR
The GTS manual has a cooler but earlier models do not. Therein lies another potential clue- the auto transmission models have a smaller a/c condenser so that the auto tranny cooler sits above the condenser whereas the manual has a larger a/c condenser filling that void. That could also be changed out but it is not necessary to do so.

Rgds

Fred
Yes! That's a really good one, Fred (and Michael).
I will definitely check for the smaller a/c condenser.
Thanks!


Quick Reply: Telltale Signs of Auto to Manual Conversion..?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:39 PM.