Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Lindsey Racing car dynos vs rest of the world

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2011, 01:26 PM
  #1  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Lindsey Racing car dynos vs rest of the world

Is it me or their dyno charts seem a little optimistic on numbers?

I worked out on 16 psi I'm around 300-320 rwhp
(ran a c63 amg and stayed with him, very slowly pulled closer to him as he took off 1st. as in my bonnet was at his drivers window. Worked out his power to weight then matched up mine. )

On one of LRs dyno charts, similar mods to me except their car has a solid cam shaft kit ran a 370 rwhp @ 18 psi

What i'm trying to work out is if i put 2 more psi on my engine i'll gain 25-30 hp her psi?

OR their solid cam shaft really makes a difference? even though it revs up to 7k rpm the maximum power was made 5500 rpm

Old 11-23-2011, 01:59 PM
  #2  
reno808
Rennlist Member
 
reno808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the garage trying to keep boost down
Posts: 8,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL
Old 11-23-2011, 02:00 PM
  #3  
reno808
Rennlist Member
 
reno808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the garage trying to keep boost down
Posts: 8,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well when i had TT chips on my k26/6 i had a 16hp increase per PSI to a certain point.
Old 11-23-2011, 02:02 PM
  #4  
95ONE
Race Car
 
95ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paulyy
Is it me or their dyno charts seem a little optimistic on numbers?

I worked out on 16 psi I'm around 300-320 rwhp
(ran a c63 amg and stayed with him, very slowly pulled closer to him as he took off 1st. as in my bonnet was at his drivers window. Worked out his power to weight then matched up mine. )

On one of LRs dyno charts, similar mods to me except their car has a solid cam shaft kit ran a 370 rwhp @ 18 psi

What i'm trying to work out is if i put 2 more psi on my engine i'll gain 25-30 hp her psi?

OR their solid cam shaft really makes a difference? even though it revs up to 7k rpm the maximum power was made 5500 rpm


For reference though, I made around that power on E-85. 350-360hp 17psi. FULL BOLT ON EVERYTHING. Stock Block head and cam though.
Old 11-23-2011, 03:26 PM
  #5  
lee101315
Three Wheelin'
 
lee101315's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Weehawken NJ
Posts: 1,583
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Paulyy
Is it me or their dyno charts seem a little optimistic on numbers?

I worked out on 16 psi I'm around 300-320 rwhp
(ran a c63 amg and stayed with him, very slowly pulled closer to him as he took off 1st. as in my bonnet was at his drivers window. Worked out his power to weight then matched up mine. )

On one of LRs dyno charts, similar mods to me except their car has a solid cam shaft kit ran a 370 rwhp @ 18 psi

What i'm trying to work out is if i put 2 more psi on my engine i'll gain 25-30 hp her psi?

OR their solid cam shaft really makes a difference? even though it revs up to 7k rpm the maximum power was made 5500 rpm

Maybe Lindsey is a bit optimistic, but in relevant to your turbo and boost, 300-320whp is common here on the "magic dynos" we have here in the USA.

I have a super 75 turbo, maybe itll put down 420whp at 21psi as they claim?
realistically, id be happy to get 340whp....

I dont think the solid lifter helps make that peak power either...maybe instead of dropping 30hp after 6500 youll only drop 20...
Old 11-23-2011, 04:03 PM
  #6  
DDP
Rocket Scientist
Rennlist Member
 
DDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

You need to look at where the power is, though. Most of their turbos are oversized and yes, they make power, but late in the curve. It also greatly depends on the dyno and correction. When they're advertising on their own website do you think they're going to use a low or high reading dyno?

Also, I think people get far too consumed with dyno numbers. A car with a lower peak dyno number but more area under the curve will be faster. And more importantly, more enjoyable to drive.
Old 11-23-2011, 04:10 PM
  #7  
rlm328
Rennlist Member
 
rlm328's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,305
Received 309 Likes on 206 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DDP
You need to look at where the power is, though. Most of their turbos are oversized and yes, they make power, but late in the curve. It also greatly depends on the dyno and correction. When they're advertising on their own website do you think they're going to use a low or high reading dyno?

Also, I think people get far too consumed with dyno numbers. A car with a lower peak dyno number but more area under the curve will be faster. And more importantly, more enjoyable to drive.
What he said. More under the curve better running machine.
Old 11-23-2011, 05:26 PM
  #8  
Black51
Three Wheelin'
 
Black51's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DDP
You need to look at where the power is, though. Most of their turbos are oversized and yes, they make power, but late in the curve. It also greatly depends on the dyno and correction. When they're advertising on their own website do you think they're going to use a low or high reading dyno?

Also, I think people get far too consumed with dyno numbers. A car with a lower peak dyno number but more area under the curve will be faster. And more importantly, more enjoyable to drive.
+1 for more area under the curve!
Old 11-23-2011, 05:49 PM
  #9  
Darwantae951

 
Darwantae951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,034
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

+1

I chose parts for my build sO that I had the most power available at the lowest RPM. I will probably make less power than some other similar builds, but I don't want a Peaky car.
Old 11-23-2011, 07:02 PM
  #10  
pole position
Burning Brakes
 
pole position's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Official Jack off extinguisher
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The power under the curve is irrelevant in a roll on race, you better be in your powerbandcwhen you start, gear/rpm. The AMG traps around 115-117 so not slow but also not superfast. The area under the curve becomes significant when you race from a dig, daily stop and go driving or on a tight roadcourse,

Modern turbos like yours need psi, you are not willing to do that so the results are expected. E85 or Meth injection and crank the boost to 24 psi and that turbo will shine..
Old 11-23-2011, 07:47 PM
  #11  
Jeremy Himsel
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Jeremy Himsel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ - NJ Runaway
Posts: 3,649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you pick up a K&N air filter, you'll pick up another 10 RWHP. Summit racing says so.
Old 11-23-2011, 09:25 PM
  #12  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

i won't get to go e85 untill i change the fuel pump and clutch since it won't hold that much torque, But as i've heard these turbos do shine at higher psi.

mine is quite laggy peak torque is around ~4200 rpm but then again i to get 3 psi from 2k to 5 psi at 3k rpm which feels like an n/a. kind if my fault for saying "yeah fine" when they told me tial didn't have any .63 a/r housings and said do you want a .82. but no reqrets.

95one: that power seems good, i might go later today and log some maf voltage. mine is also full bolt on. next power mod will have to be port polish head and an intake. but i'm not going there.
Old 11-23-2011, 09:57 PM
  #13  
95ONE
Race Car
 
95ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

.82 A/R should still spool HARD by 3500. Mine was swinging the boost gauage to infinity at or around 3100. (.63 A/R)

Last edited by 95ONE; 11-28-2011 at 06:21 PM.
Old 11-23-2011, 11:26 PM
  #14  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I know i have a small exhaust leak at the xover flanges which i'll be fixing one of these days when i get around to it. it might cause it to spool longer.
Old 11-23-2011, 11:48 PM
  #15  
Black51
Three Wheelin'
 
Black51's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pole position
The power under the curve is irrelevant in a roll on race, you better be in your powerbandcwhen you start, gear/rpm. The AMG traps around 115-117 so not slow but also not superfast. The area under the curve becomes significant when you race from a dig, daily stop and go driving or on a tight roadcourse,

Modern turbos like yours need psi, you are not willing to do that so the results are expected. E85 or Meth injection and crank the boost to 24 psi and that turbo will shine..
How is the power under the curve ever irrelevant??

If one car has more area under the RPM curve from a given starting RPM(this is from a roll), yet less peak HP than another car, it's still gonna be faster.

The only difference with from a roll than from a dig is you need to have more area from the starting RPM all the way up to the shift point to be faster. Peak HP is what's almost, but not completely irrelevant, since having a higher peak HP that another car means for that instance in the RPM band, you'll have more area than the other car.

That mean's that if you ideally stay in that higher area point all the time, you would win in a race. Ever wonder why F1 cars use such a narrow RPM band?...


Quick Reply: Lindsey Racing car dynos vs rest of the world



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:54 PM.