964 TT build - Need help with gearbox choice/ratios
#631
Pro
Thread Starter
#633
Pro
Thread Starter
But when I called with the German supplier of the parts he said they always shim, reason being they want the deck height very precise. Why spend all the money on special parts but not go the extra mile to get the optimal deck height and squish.
Goal being exactly 0.8mm I think.
I believe no engine is the same and with all these custom items coming together there is bound to be a little deviation. So either shim or machine the cylinder depending on which direction you need to go.
You're talking Gt3RSR 4L crank, Pauter custom length conrods, custom pistons, Mahle 102mm cylinders and custom heads in a 26yr old engine case.
Somehow that all has to fit to leave exactly 0.8mm deck height (space between piston and head) for optimal squish.
If anybody has some experience with this and has a strong option on why shims are bad, let me know. I think a custom laser cut shim would be just fine, but I have no experience with this.
Fitting conrods would probably be better, maybe I should check with Pauter if I can exchange.
#634
I understand that you need a 1mm shim.
That is too much to blame on tolerances only, so I would think that somewhere in the process of selecting the bits and pieces someone has made a calculation error of 1mm?
Maybe the conrods are 1mm too long or the position of the pistonpen (is that english?) is not correct.
That is too much to blame on tolerances only, so I would think that somewhere in the process of selecting the bits and pieces someone has made a calculation error of 1mm?
Maybe the conrods are 1mm too long or the position of the pistonpen (is that english?) is not correct.
#637
Hi Thomas, I have no idea on the pro's and cons I'm afraid but would love for Colin to chime in....where are you batman?;-)
From a theoretic perspective on a single cilinder engine I see no problem with shimming, on a multi cilinder engine that shares a single camshaft the answer whether shimming is right or wrong is a bit more complicated as it depends on why shimming is needed.
When the top face of the cilinders is leveled out through shimming this seems good news since all three cilinders have equal height / are on a level plane , bolting on the cilinder heads should now create equal height in turn to mount the cam housing against. However when shims are used the equal out variance in rod length, piston height etc. which in turn leads to unequal cilinder deck height / unequal plane amongst the three of them the cam housing will distort when bolting things on top op the cilinders....not good.
Again, the above is just me theorizing....
From a theoretic perspective on a single cilinder engine I see no problem with shimming, on a multi cilinder engine that shares a single camshaft the answer whether shimming is right or wrong is a bit more complicated as it depends on why shimming is needed.
When the top face of the cilinders is leveled out through shimming this seems good news since all three cilinders have equal height / are on a level plane , bolting on the cilinder heads should now create equal height in turn to mount the cam housing against. However when shims are used the equal out variance in rod length, piston height etc. which in turn leads to unequal cilinder deck height / unequal plane amongst the three of them the cam housing will distort when bolting things on top op the cilinders....not good.
Again, the above is just me theorizing....
#638
Pro
Thread Starter
Thanks for your thoughts, appreciated.
Yes, shimming the cylinders differently would be bad. I get that, but thats not the idea here. Measure one, apply the same shim to all.
I contacted a few others and one engine builder in the US said no problem to shim a 964 engine and another one in Germany said change the parts, don't shim. I lean towards the last, like Frank said the build is too bespoke to cut corners.
Yes, shimming the cylinders differently would be bad. I get that, but thats not the idea here. Measure one, apply the same shim to all.
I contacted a few others and one engine builder in the US said no problem to shim a 964 engine and another one in Germany said change the parts, don't shim. I lean towards the last, like Frank said the build is too bespoke to cut corners.
#639
Rennlist Member
Are the cylinder base seals in this engine radial o-rings (machined grooves in the casing) or plane seals?
If they are the former, I don't see how shimming would have any effect in the sealing (as mentioned in a previous post)!?
If they are the former, I don't see how shimming would have any effect in the sealing (as mentioned in a previous post)!?
#640
Pro
Thread Starter
#641
Pro
Thread Starter
Engine is going to be done late January, with the shims. Talked with the engine builder and he convinced me easily. I have a lot of trust in his work, it will be fine.
In the meanwhile having some bodywork finished up, should be done in the next two weeks or so. More cooling in the front, for the intercooler and the oil coolers.
In the meanwhile having some bodywork finished up, should be done in the next two weeks or so. More cooling in the front, for the intercooler and the oil coolers.
#643
Pro
Thread Starter
I'm having some really wild ideas on how to finish up the car when the engine is completely under control and squared away. Just some last nip and tuck ideas I've been having lately, without messing up the Carrera 2 nb look.
Also found some nice 18" cup wheels (the Jara's). I thought they are cool because they are more in line with the Carrera 2 concept, but the downside is they are heavier than the modern Fuchs. I'd have to see how much but I think it's around 2-3kg per corner.
Also found some nice 18" cup wheels (the Jara's). I thought they are cool because they are more in line with the Carrera 2 concept, but the downside is they are heavier than the modern Fuchs. I'd have to see how much but I think it's around 2-3kg per corner.
#645
Pro
Thread Starter
Instead of having the coolers lengthwise they will be turned 90deg with these.