Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Engine orientation/ oil starvation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2024, 08:55 PM
  #1  
Aussie skypig
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Aussie skypig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
Posts: 110
Received 52 Likes on 27 Posts
Default Engine orientation/ oil starvation

Displaying my ignorance once again.
Am I correct, in understanding the engine in the 987.1 is “turned around” from the installation in the 911? (The crank end facing forward would be facing rear in the 911)

Does this mean the well documented oil starvation would occur during sustained high G LEFT hand corners?

I’m about to order a “Ultimate Integrated Dry Sump UIDS v2.2”
https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...v2-2-a-63.html

Old 01-29-2024, 09:39 PM
  #2  
jscott82
Rennlist Member
 
jscott82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,076
Received 363 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

My data shows mainly right hand corners... I see issues both ways but right hand seems to be much worse.
The following users liked this post:
Aussie skypig (01-29-2024)
Old 01-29-2024, 10:50 PM
  #3  
harveyf
Rennlist Member
 
harveyf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Hill, NC
Posts: 2,224
Received 422 Likes on 302 Posts
Default

Do you plan on tracking or racing the car with super sticky tires? If not, I'd suggest that your purchase may be overkill. But this oil starvation issue is a volitile topic, I'm sure you'll get lots of opinions.
Old 01-29-2024, 10:56 PM
  #4  
Aussie skypig
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Aussie skypig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
Posts: 110
Received 52 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by harveyf
Do you plan on tracking or racing the car with super sticky tires? If not, I'd suggest that your purchase may be overkill. But this oil starvation issue is a volitile topic, I'm sure you'll get lots of opinions.
I agree. Very likely overkill. My plans are track days on road tires only at this stage.
Still, I feel like this is a forever car, and apart from cost, there are no downsides?

And if it saved any damage, ever, - cheap!

Old 01-30-2024, 09:52 AM
  #5  
harveyf
Rennlist Member
 
harveyf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Hill, NC
Posts: 2,224
Received 422 Likes on 302 Posts
Default

In that case, we are on the same page. My current 2007 Cayman S is built to be track capable, but will only run on street tires. My build includes a Hartech deep sump, which is overkill on street tires. Upon the advice of Brandon at Slakker Racing, I am going with the stock AOS. I have a manometer setup and will track sump vacuum as a regular engine health item.

I would be curious, knowing that you have a Jake Raby engine, was that build by him a "track" build? I know he charges quite a premium for his track builds and is somewhat circumspect about what all they do. Did it come to you with a stock sump and a stock AOS?
Old 01-30-2024, 10:18 AM
  #6  
Hal
Rennlist Member
 
Hal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,325
Received 84 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

A long read, but well worth your time. And a possible solution.
Old 01-30-2024, 10:45 AM
  #7  
SlakkerRacingDev
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
SlakkerRacingDev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 76
Received 182 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

The UIDS, along with a couple of other options, has shown very good data and will help protect your engine from on track oil starvation. Using a high quality 50W oil filled to the max fill line, keeping it fresh, and keeping oil temps below 245F are a few other keys to engine health.
__________________
Brandon Clark
Slakker Racing Development
www.sr.dev


Certified Cylinder Head Machinist - AERA
Certified Hartech Machining and Engine Rebuilding - Hartech UK
Certified High Performance Tuner - EFI Univ

Be sure to check out our FB page and our Porsche Engine Nerds group.
The following 2 users liked this post by SlakkerRacingDev:
Aussie skypig (01-30-2024), Porschetech3 (02-03-2024)
Old 01-30-2024, 11:05 AM
  #8  
sasilverbullet
Rennlist Member
 
sasilverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 3,238
Received 746 Likes on 387 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SlakkerRacingDev
The UIDS, along with a couple of other options, has shown very good data and will help protect your engine from on track oil starvation. Using a high quality 50W oil filled to the max fill line, keeping it fresh, and keeping oil temps below 245F are a few other keys to engine health.
Is that with stock AOS, or the UAOS?
Old 01-30-2024, 11:43 AM
  #9  
SlakkerRacingDev
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
SlakkerRacingDev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 76
Received 182 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sasilverbullet
Is that with stock AOS, or the UAOS?
Either. I've done quite a bit of on track testing with the stock OEM AOS overfilled by as much as 1.75 quarts and am confident it can handle being filled to the max fill line. After extensive conversations with Skip, I no longer recommend overfilling without using the UAOS and we now offer it as an option on our engine builds.
The following users liked this post:
Porschetech3 (02-03-2024)
Old 01-30-2024, 01:24 PM
  #10  
SlakkerRacingDev
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
SlakkerRacingDev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 76
Received 182 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

I got this emailed to me the other day and it's a good example of early warning signs of spinning a rod bearing. 987.1S running 40W oil, .5 qt deep sump, EBS baffle, UAOS, 4-6 track days per year.
Attached Images  
The following users liked this post:
Porschetech3 (02-03-2024)
Old 01-30-2024, 01:57 PM
  #11  
GLTHFJ60
Intermediate
 
GLTHFJ60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 25
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The LN Engineering UAOS or the porsche motorsports AOS?
Old 01-30-2024, 05:36 PM
  #12  
RJ80
Rennlist Member
 
RJ80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 222
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SlakkerRacingDev
I got this emailed to me the other day and it's a good example of early warning signs of spinning a rod bearing.
Is that with regard to increased copper and slightly low oil viscosity?

Do you think any deep sump/baffle combination is adequate on its own to prevent engine damage on track, given the issues of failure we've seen reported here with other deep sump/baffle "solutions"?
Old 01-30-2024, 08:44 PM
  #13  
SlakkerRacingDev
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
SlakkerRacingDev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 76
Received 182 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GLTHFJ60
The LN Engineering UAOS or the porsche motorsports AOS?
Charles "Skip" Brazeel's UAOS

Originally Posted by RJ80
Is that with regard to increased copper and slightly low oil viscosity?

Do you think any deep sump/baffle combination is adequate on its own to prevent engine damage on track, given the issues of failure we've seen reported here with other deep sump/baffle "solutions"?
Yes. Both the Hartech Racing Sump and LN 2qt deep sump performed well in my testing when oil temps were kept in the 230's, fill level was at max or higher, and a fresh 50W oil was used. I believe the same could be accomplished with 60W oil for temps in the mid 240's. I've also seen data that looked pretty good from the UIDS.

Here is a graph showing the Hartech sump vs a stock sump. The dark green line across the top is the stock sump and everywhere you see it drop down is where the oil pump is sucking air. The bright green line is the Hartech sump.

I've also attached a graph from the Driven catalog that I think does a good job of showing the effect of temperature on viscosity. For track use, you want viscosity to be around 12cSt but no less than 10. XP6 is their 15W50.
Attached Images   
The following 5 users liked this post by SlakkerRacingDev:
Aussie skypig (01-31-2024), GLTHFJ60 (01-31-2024), harveyf (01-30-2024), Porschetech3 (02-03-2024), RJ80 (01-31-2024)
Old 01-31-2024, 06:02 PM
  #14  
Aussie skypig
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Aussie skypig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
Posts: 110
Received 52 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jscott82
My data shows mainly right hand corners... I see issues both ways but right hand seems to be much worse.
What tires are you running to encounter the pressure drop? Race/Track type?
Are you running any sort of “deep sump”?
Old 01-31-2024, 06:12 PM
  #15  
Aussie skypig
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Aussie skypig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
Posts: 110
Received 52 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by harveyf
In that case, we are on the same page. My current 2007 Cayman S is built to be track capable, but will only run on street tires. My build includes a Hartech deep sump, which is overkill on street tires. Upon the advice of Brandon at Slakker Racing, I am going with the stock AOS. I have a manometer setup and will track sump vacuum as a regular engine health item.

I would be curious, knowing that you have a Jake Raby engine, was that build by him a "track" build? I know he charges quite a premium for his track builds and is somewhat circumspect about what all they do. Did it come to you with a stock sump and a stock AOS?
”Road and Track performer. Stage II”
I’m not the original purchaser, but the sump looks stock. As is the AOS, as far as I know.
It has a spin on filter installed.
Zero issues - I’m. Looking at the better sump as extra insurance.


Quick Reply: Engine orientation/ oil starvation



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:37 PM.