Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Autoweek/Andy Pilgrim 991 GT3 vs Z/28 at Barber Motorsport Park

Old 03-25-2014, 12:21 PM
  #46  
tcsracing1
Rennlist Member
 
tcsracing1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere in a galaxy far, far away....
Posts: 17,106
Likes: 0
Received 256 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
I was expecting your restored pics :-)
speaking of restored i am still working on this Camaro... Waiting on the 6 speed tranny to arrive.
(sorry for the big pics)
Attached Images   
Old 03-25-2014, 12:32 PM
  #47  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,336
Received 1,585 Likes on 733 Posts
Default

There we go
Old 03-25-2014, 01:56 PM
  #48  
cbweaver1
Racer
 
cbweaver1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for posting this article. My thinking is not how much faster the GT3 would have been on equal rubber but how much slower the Z28 would be on anything less than a Trofeo R due to the sheer mass of the vehicle. While I appreciate what Chevy is trying to do, their car is just too heavy IMO to use anything less than a premiere tire or for that matter be consistently reliable for an entire weekend when it is warm, humid or worse HOT. Those were optimal conditions for some quick laps in this test. Put the temp. @ 90F+ and go for an entire weekend with four 30 minute typical DE sessions and lets see how the car's brakes, tires & super charger are performing. Should the owner properly set the car up with even the most basic of safety features akin to a Club Sport kit (please tell me why Chevy did not have the fore thought to offer that as an option?), this car will be tipping the scales at well over 4,000#+ with driver. The delta in price they speak of at MSRP will be quickly reduced to even or less with the GT3 when one factors in all the expendables (think PCCB's, not rubber) and significantly larger % amounts of depreciation.

Got buy'em early adopters I hope you can prove these assumptions wrong.
Old 03-25-2014, 02:05 PM
  #49  
85Gold
Rennlist Member
 
85Gold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 92 miles from Sebring
Posts: 4,957
Received 709 Likes on 414 Posts
Default

No SC it is NA all the way. Would be interesting if you can run 315 NT01's. Yes I used to run a Boss at 3600# and the only high wear item was brake pads, needed a StopTech 6 piston system.

Peter
Old 03-25-2014, 02:05 PM
  #50  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

With regard to which car is easier to drive, I took Andy Pilgrim's comments in the article at face value instead of trying to reinvent them to fit my preconceived ideas. I just re-read them and they seemed very specific and straightforward. But then he's just an accomplished GM factory driver who tested both cars on track back to back; what does he know?
Old 03-25-2014, 02:15 PM
  #51  
cbweaver1
Racer
 
cbweaver1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 85Gold
No SC it is NA all the way. Would be interesting if you can run 315 NT01's. Yes I used to run a Boss at 3600# and the only high wear item was brake pads, needed a StopTech 6 piston system.

Peter
Thank you for the correction on the SC, I must have over looked that.
Old 03-25-2014, 05:21 PM
  #52  
ChrisF
Rennlist Member
 
ChrisF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: La La Land
Posts: 4,143
Received 888 Likes on 336 Posts
Default

Haven't tried the MPSCII's but have tracked the Trofeo R's and MPSC's quite a bit. I found the Trofeo's a lot more grippy. Grippiest treaded tire I've ever driven.
Old 03-25-2014, 05:41 PM
  #53  
kosmo
Race Director
 
kosmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THE Republic
Posts: 10,594
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Savy , you need to get this instead

http://www.callawaycars.com/wp-conte...Z28_021914.pdf
Old 03-25-2014, 08:29 PM
  #54  
mainly
Racer
 
mainly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: edmonton, alberta, canada
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol, you could tell the article is biased...

i mean the guy said he drifted the gt3 around EVERY corner, and it was still faster.

... H E L L O ?

along with the less sticky tires and non CC brakes???

please....
Old 03-25-2014, 08:35 PM
  #55  
savyboy
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
savyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Reno NV
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm surprised at some of the comments. Knee-jerking seems to overrule homework, I'd have expected more from a crowd that has the wherewithal to afford a 991 GT3. The are some truly embarrassing claims being made and questions asked here.

On a side note- weight doesn't appear to be a deal-killer for other Porsche buyers, maybe if GM had priced the Z/28 at a million dollars and limited it to 918 to be built, it might have found a better reception?

This TopGear article gently presents some facts that elude folks: http://www.topgear.com/uk/car-news/f...28-2014-034-24

What is interesting to me, as a car guy, and not a make fanboy, is how roles have reversed in only a year. Porsche, thought of as the track weapon, is supplanted by an American (well North American) car at half the price. The American car provides the visceral, analog experience, and on-track factory warranty and races the exact engine found in the street car. The reality more than matches the marketing.

The Porsche goes "upmarket" as a street cruiser, chock full of gizmos and driving aids, that can go to the track if it needs to.

Crazy days. As a car-guy, I love it. It's a truly special time.
Old 03-25-2014, 10:52 PM
  #56  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,510
Received 1,719 Likes on 912 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by savyboy
This TopGear article gently presents some facts that elude folks: http://www.topgear.com/uk/car-news/f...28-2014-034-24
Oh my.
Old 03-25-2014, 11:03 PM
  #57  
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Mvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 0
Received 210 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

this article just makes me dislike both cars, more than I already do.

997 GT3RS FTW.....
Old 03-25-2014, 11:07 PM
  #58  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,510
Received 1,719 Likes on 912 Posts
Default

Somebody spent a lot of time watching Bullitt….

Old 03-25-2014, 11:09 PM
  #59  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mainly
lol, you could tell the article is biased...

i mean the guy said he drifted the gt3 around EVERY corner, and it was still faster.

... H E L L O ?

along with the less sticky tires and non CC brakes???

please....
Non CC doesn't make **** worth of difference in terms of a lap time here. Stop perpetuating the myth. Especially around a short course like this. Don't you think if it did, Porsche would try to advertise it as a lap time/performance advantage like they do with PDK?

CC brakes DO NOT stop better.
They are lighter (sort of, the larger rotor and caliper size likely negates much of the weight advantage)
They are heat/fade resistant.
They are super expensive to replace and will fall apart with track use.
Old 03-25-2014, 11:33 PM
  #60  
SamFromTX
Drifting
 
SamFromTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,131
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
Non CC doesn't make **** worth of difference in terms of a lap time here. Stop perpetuating the myth. Especially around a short course like this. Don't you think if it did, Porsche would try to advertise it as a lap time/performance advantage like they do with PDK?

CC brakes DO NOT stop better.
They are lighter (sort of, the larger rotor and caliper size likely negates much of the weight advantage)
They are heat/fade resistant.
They are super expensive to replace and will fall apart with track use.
This proves the power of marketing. I agree with you 100%

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Autoweek/Andy Pilgrim 991 GT3 vs Z/28 at Barber Motorsport Park



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:07 PM.