Notices
991 Turbo 2012-2019 Turbo and Turbo S
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Road Spy

60-130 MPH times with BIG turbo????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2022, 04:33 PM
  #121  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,445
Received 167 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

I don't really care about this discussion but for informational purposes, the maximum slope or ending slope do not matter to calculate the performance difference. Average slope across the run is what matters..

Gradient= Height/distance x 100.
Climbing KW required =(mass (Ton) x g x velocity x Gradient)/360,000, multiply result by 1.34 for HP.

An average 3% slope impacts 4.7% the power on the ground and 5.7% acceleration time difference on a 3500 lbs GT2RS with driver..

A GT2RS doing a 60-130mph in 6.02s on a perfect straight line does a 5.72s on a 3% average slope. It can only be calculated through a simulation model
Jean is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by Jean:
geekcarguy (01-28-2022), nismonian (01-27-2022), rodsky (01-28-2022)
Old 01-27-2022, 04:42 PM
  #122  
2fcknfst
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
2fcknfst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,733
Likes: 0
Received 3,872 Likes on 2,948 Posts
Default

Jean; Porsche Sleeper Agent Extraordinaire...
2fcknfst is offline  
Old 01-27-2022, 04:55 PM
  #123  
Pb Pedis
Rennlist Member
 
Pb Pedis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Wellington, FL
Posts: 1,774
Received 1,011 Likes on 636 Posts
Default Yep...

Originally Posted by Ttz06vette
...I am Stage 3 with Sams tune and I couldn’t be happier. I thought of swapping the turbos while I was under there doing the rest of the work but decided to see where I was with just the stage 3 first. These cars are just so incredibly fast and respond so well to small changes like reducing backpressure and tuning I am enjoying the car exactly like it is. When I need a little more, Sam made me a 100 octane tune that I use. Maybe down the road I will want more but for now my sweet spot is jumping in the car and spending a week driving it in the mountains without any Turbo lag or worried about it throwing a CEL or breaking down…and on the way, if challenged by other cars in a straight line, it more than holds its own with 90% of other cars out there.
This is where I am too - the balance is just right with my mods and how responsive it is on the road, so why mess with it? Because I don't know how to leave well enough alone.
Pb Pedis is offline  
The following users liked this post:
nismonian (01-27-2022)
Old 01-27-2022, 05:37 PM
  #124  
onfireTTS
Drifting
 
onfireTTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,255
Received 1,094 Likes on 844 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2fcknfst
Jean; Porsche Sleeper Agent Extraordinaire...
Exactly. Jean is top tier.
onfireTTS is offline  
Old 01-28-2022, 12:39 AM
  #125  
bigrpowr
Rennlist Member
 
bigrpowr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,061
Received 332 Likes on 229 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jean
I don't really care about this discussion but for informational purposes, the maximum slope or ending slope do not matter to calculate the performance difference. Average slope across the run is what matters..

Gradient= Height/distance x 100.
Climbing KW required =(mass (Ton) x g x velocity x Gradient)/360,000, multiply result by 1.34 for HP.

An average 3% slope impacts 4.7% the power on the ground and 5.7% acceleration time difference on a 3500 lbs GT2RS with driver..

A GT2RS doing a 60-130mph in 6.02s on a perfect straight line does a 5.72s on a 3% average slope. It can only be calculated through a simulation model
i can attest to this when mine was a 3.85 and it was marked invalid due to 3% or just under. the next run a 1% was a 4.09 .
bigrpowr is offline  
Old 01-28-2022, 02:07 AM
  #126  
SamboTT@ByDesign
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
SamboTT@ByDesign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,375
Received 925 Likes on 565 Posts
Default

These real world things
__________________


Proud TOP Porsche Distributor For:

Kline-Innovation - ams Performance - TiALSPORT/XONA - #1 COBB PRO TUNER - CSF - IPD Plenums - DO88 - dodsonmotorsport

310-600-1850 - sam@bydesignauto.com
SamboTT@ByDesign is online now  
Old 01-28-2022, 02:09 AM
  #127  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,445
Received 167 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

We need to look at this as a percentage rather than absolute number i.e. a 5s run with a 3% slope benefits time by around 0.29s if all other parameters are identical.

By the way the 60-130mph started here on RL by a bunch of us on the 993TT forum in May 2004, way before the 6speed forum. Thread is still here with thousands of views, those were some really silly discussions 18 years ago.
Jean is offline  
Old 01-28-2022, 04:28 AM
  #128  
geekcarguy
Intermediate
 
geekcarguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Sweden
Posts: 47
Received 27 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

New to this thread, forum and to this platform also. And already hate seeing the mashing of other tuners / bs talk. Keep it civil folks!

But what I’m not new to is cars and performance times. I’ve been doing 100-200kmh (from Sweden) for over 15 years. Ofcourse slope has a great impact. And the only reason vbox allowed -3%, is because with their software on the computer, it would correct the slope. If you put in 4,86 on a-2.8% in the software it will show a corrected value of around 5.1s. That you’ve run a 4,9x with -0.9% slope is actually quicker then the 4,86s. And thats just how it is, that some have quicker times uphill sometimes can vary on many things, usually it’s the running conditions of the car, maybe it was pulling some timing on the other runs, maybe the shift points wasn’t as good. Maybe it was a different day and different DA. Etc etc.

anyways I really hope the thread starter gets his car sorted. I can only imagine the frustration of having spent that much money and it would be slower then stock turbo cars good luck with it!

But as many have stated. Take it to a different dyno, you’ll see straight away your not making near the quoted power.

Have a great day!
geekcarguy is offline  
The following users liked this post:
jsbihn (01-28-2022)
Old 01-28-2022, 06:50 PM
  #129  
jsbihn
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jsbihn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 462
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Hey my brothers,
So I have a new thought of discussion to continue to push forward with my current situation....
I know we have alot of really intelligent people on here from AIM, By Design, private builders, and so on...
So hopefully, this might get us thinking

Situation:
Send the car out for a big turbo upgrade kit, get the car back, take it out the first day back with my car acting completely fine and it was doing well for the first day out, i was out running with my buddy all day long full of aggressive driving, but then after the 10-15 mph from stop light low speed methanol issue... no issues after a code reset there has been no codes, no CELs, no smoking or any noise.
But the car started running a little slower... and the trans starts missing the shift from 1-2 and 2-3.... so the car returns to the shop.... ever since the car has had so many issues over and over.
tuning and retuning, has gotten it better but obviously you all know where i am now
it has become such a mess.... Would you think it is in the programming or wouldnt you think it is a broken or improperly performing hard part?
Thanks

jsbihn is offline  
Old 01-28-2022, 07:55 PM
  #130  
Ttz06vette
Rennlist Member
 
Ttz06vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 651
Received 220 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

Sounds like tuning to me, both engine and PDK. What do you mean when you say low speed methanol issue? Hoping you didn't continue aggressive driving if you had a methanol issue?
Ttz06vette is offline  
Old 01-28-2022, 09:35 PM
  #131  
jsbihn
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jsbihn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 462
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ttz06vette
Sounds like tuning to me, both engine and PDK. What do you mean when you say low speed methanol issue? Hoping you didn't continue aggressive driving if you had a methanol issue?
- pulled away from a light, at about 15-20mph maybe, i noticed the coast was clear... so I hit the gas, turbo start to spool and the car lights up like a christmas tree and every code porsche could think of. I limp home, scan the codes (write them down), then reset. Started the engine.... everything is fine. no CELs, no codes, no noises, no smoke, nothing dripping and so on.... and since then though the driving has been limited because of these other issues... no nothing.

as for the answer, why would you go with tuning versus a hard part malfunction?
just seems weird that from that point, it instantly ran bad and has had issues ever since that continuous tuning cant seem to fix...
(i figured a hard part and all the tuning isnt working because it cant correct for the hard part issue, so i would like to learn here :-) )
jsbihn is offline  
Old 01-28-2022, 10:03 PM
  #132  
onfireTTS
Drifting
 
onfireTTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,255
Received 1,094 Likes on 844 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jsbihn
- pulled away from a light, at about 15-20mph maybe, i noticed the coast was clear... so I hit the gas, turbo start to spool and the car lights up like a christmas tree and every code porsche could think of. I limp home, scan the codes (write them down), then reset. Started the engine.... everything is fine. no CELs, no codes, no noises, no smoke, nothing dripping and so on.... and since then though the driving has been limited because of these other issues... no nothing.

as for the answer, why would you go with tuning versus a hard part malfunction?
just seems weird that from that point, it instantly ran bad and has had issues ever since that continuous tuning cant seem to fix...
(i figured a hard part and all the tuning isnt working because it cant correct for the hard part issue, so i would like to learn here :-) )
Since you are running Cobb, post up a wide open throttle log to show the data.
onfireTTS is offline  
Old 01-28-2022, 10:35 PM
  #133  
Ttz06vette
Rennlist Member
 
Ttz06vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 651
Received 220 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

It's possible you could have blown off a throttle body, intake, or turbo hose, but I'm guessing you checked all of that already as well as vacuum leaks. The fact that it's not throwing the codes again after reset is why I said tuning.

Last edited by Ttz06vette; 01-28-2022 at 10:38 PM.
Ttz06vette is offline  
Old 01-28-2022, 11:14 PM
  #134  
onfireTTS
Drifting
 
onfireTTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,255
Received 1,094 Likes on 844 Posts
Default

"the first day back with my car acting completely fine and it was doing well for the first day out"

Any Dragy data when it was "completely fine" ?
onfireTTS is offline  
Old 01-29-2022, 01:18 PM
  #135  
jsbihn
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jsbihn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 462
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by onfireTTS
Since you are running Cobb, post up a wide open throttle log to show the data.
- are you asking for me to datalog a wide open throttle log? like a 60-130 run? or are you saying post a picture of the cobb guage setup at WOT?

Originally Posted by Ttz06vette
It's possible you could have blown off a throttle body, intake, or turbo hose, but I'm guessing you checked all of that already as well as vacuum leaks. The fact that it's not throwing the codes again after reset is why I said tuning.
- True. I know that there are some issues that occur when small hoses come off and it messes up performance without throwing a code (like a small clear tube that is T'ed into and have a tendency to pop off)
Of course, I am not 100% sure the shop did the due diligence when it went back and they checked it all out. especially when the shop owner assured me that the car was supposely 100% perfect, but the day me and my wife drove 7 hours to pick it up... it displayed everything was the same. it has not been touched... other then them putting 300 miles on it. So I have a feeling there wasnt much attention to the engine to make sure everything is 100.

Originally Posted by onfireTTS
"the first day back with my car acting completely fine and it was doing well for the first day out"

Any Dragy data when it was "completely fine" ?
- unfortunately, i dont. i didnt have my dragy yet... it wasnt until the car slowed down that the i felt the need to test it out.
jsbihn is offline  


Quick Reply: 60-130 MPH times with BIG turbo????



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:51 AM.