Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Feb Road and Track 991 C2S test :991 0-60=3.7 sec!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2012, 12:07 PM
  #1  
kleegamefan
3rd Gear
Thread Starter
 
kleegamefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Feb Road and Track 991 C2S test :991 0-60=3.7 sec!!!!

Just saw the latest road and track in which they tested a 7 speed manual 991 Carrera 2 S and the acceleration numbers are eye opening....literally as quick or quicker than a 997.1 GT3


This is nearly as quick as Car and Drivers 0-60 numbers for their 991 C2S PDK (3.6 sec) and I read on 6speedonline.com that motor trend also got 3.7 sec 0-60 in their review, though I am not sure if that was for a 7 speed manual or a PDK.

For sure, the 991 C2S is a very, very fast car!!!
Old 01-03-2012, 01:30 PM
  #2  
Jon70
Rennlist Member
 
Jon70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,583
Received 77 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

I agree that is fast, but I think 0 to 100 is more indicative of acceleration. The factors that can help with a good 0 to 60 time, such as temps, launch, gearing, drivetrain, get diluted as the end mph increases.
Old 01-03-2012, 01:56 PM
  #3  
Betternotbigger
Racer
 
Betternotbigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jon70
I agree that is fast, but I think 0 to 100 is more indicative of acceleration.
Not within the law it isn't.

(Except on track of course, but that isn't where the C2S is destined to prowl).
Old 01-03-2012, 01:58 PM
  #4  
texas911
Race Car
 
texas911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Whatever, its still damn fast in any book.
Old 01-03-2012, 03:02 PM
  #5  
JasonNY
Instructor
 
JasonNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What's the 0-100 and ¼mile time and trap speed from R&T?
Old 01-03-2012, 07:40 PM
  #6  
Michael T
Racer
 
Michael T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston
Posts: 446
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Smile

8.6 to 100, 12.0 at 118mph in the quarter mile.
Old 01-03-2012, 08:15 PM
  #7  
JasonNY
Instructor
 
JasonNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Michael T
8.6 to 100, 12.0 at 118mph in the quarter mile.
I think you've posted the Car & Driver results with the PDK, not the Road & Track ??
Old 01-03-2012, 10:25 PM
  #8  
Alstoy
Burning Brakes
 
Alstoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm curious why Porsche has been a bit mum about the base C2. I can't remember if they did that with the 997 launch. It does make me think that the base car will either outshine the S (wouldn't that be funny) or be totally crap.
Old 01-03-2012, 11:16 PM
  #9  
rijowysock
Nordschleife Master
 
rijowysock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Arctic Cold
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alstoy
I'm curious why Porsche has been a bit mum about the base C2. I can't remember if they did that with the 997 launch. It does make me think that the base car will either outshine the S (wouldn't that be funny) or be totally crap.
all the test cars seem to be pdk/sunroof/full leather with sport chrono...

the test for the car and driver didn't have sunroof which is interesting.

would love to see someone test a base model, but i've been told they aren't going into production for a little bit now... (my base build isn't coming until april but ordered when they came out)
Old 01-04-2012, 01:24 AM
  #10  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 179 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

From what I was told is that the 3.4 new base engine is not ready yet...so there is delay.
Old 01-04-2012, 02:04 AM
  #11  
96redLT4
Rennlist Member
 
96redLT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,859
Received 280 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

I just read the Motor trend article today, and I think it was also 0-60 in 3.7 for a manual...
Jim
Old 01-04-2012, 04:29 PM
  #12  
shustermeister
Racer
 
shustermeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Royal Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 453
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

C&D results:
0-60: 3.6s
0-100: 8.6s
1/4 mile: 12.0@118mph

And even though their example was spec'd out to over $131k, it beat out the Z06 ($102k) and 2013 GT-R ($92k) in total score. They really loved the way the car drives/feels...
Old 01-04-2012, 04:59 PM
  #13  
triode
Rennlist Member
 
triode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,138
Received 69 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shustermeister
Z06 ($102k)
Wow, the ZR-1 at over $100K was astounding, but a Z06??? The Cobalt interior must be distinctly more aggravating at 6 figures...
Old 01-04-2012, 08:31 PM
  #14  
10 GT3
Drifting
 
10 GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shustermeister
C&D results:
0-60: 3.6s
0-100: 8.6s
1/4 mile: 12.0@118mph

And even though their example was spec'd out to over $131k, it beat out the Z06 ($102k) and 2013 GT-R ($92k) in total score. They really loved the way the car drives/feels...
It beat the others for styling (it was the only new design), fuel economy and NVH. It did not win in performance. The price tag for all 3 seem over inflated. The GT-R sticker has risen almost $20k since it was introduced. $102K for a Z06 is pretty ridiculous, but there is something worse: $131K for a Carrera S. That is getting in Turbo/GT3 RS money and it doesn't even have an aero kit.

BTW, I do think the Z07 (carbon Brembo) equipped Z06 is the best Corvrette ever made and a better car than the higher powered ZR1. There is just one thing that bugs me, the weight. How is a Z06 carbon edition with carbon bits replacing fiberglass bits, lighter carbon brakes and lighter wheels 150 lbs heavier than the same car with the supposedly heavier parts was in 2007?

Last edited by 10 GT3; 01-04-2012 at 09:28 PM.
Old 01-04-2012, 09:38 PM
  #15  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,895
Received 81 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Guys... be careful with those numbers, that includes .4 seconds of roll! So, the TRUE number is more like 4.1 for 0-60, which is still impressive.


Quick Reply: Feb Road and Track 991 C2S test :991 0-60=3.7 sec!!!!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:50 PM.