Elephant Sport Bushings - Rear Suspension
#47
Burning Brakes
Look What Santa Brought Me
These are the RS parts
93.331.045.80 Kinematic Control Arm x2 RS, top rear
993.331.041.81 A arm /L RS RS
993.331.042.81 A arm /R RS RS
993.331.217.80 Eccentric screw x2 top forward inner camber
993.331.219.80 Eccentric washer x2 top forward inner camber
This is the stock camber arm and also used on the RS, this one doesn't use stiffer rubber
993.331.047.03 x2 top forward camber
When I used the RS parts the above is what I had w/ Tarret mono-ball toe links + locks
Some guys are going a step further and changing the cambers link to the stiffer rubber bush too. I see that as a positive step
going from stock to full RS was a huge positive step and then going from RS to full RSR mono-***** was as big a positive step, I see the extra sport bush on the camber links(w/ RS KT and A) w/ either mono-ball or sport rubber toe links as in between RS and RSR
93.331.045.80 Kinematic Control Arm x2 RS, top rear
993.331.041.81 A arm /L RS RS
993.331.042.81 A arm /R RS RS
993.331.217.80 Eccentric screw x2 top forward inner camber
993.331.219.80 Eccentric washer x2 top forward inner camber
This is the stock camber arm and also used on the RS, this one doesn't use stiffer rubber
993.331.047.03 x2 top forward camber
When I used the RS parts the above is what I had w/ Tarret mono-ball toe links + locks
Some guys are going a step further and changing the cambers link to the stiffer rubber bush too. I see that as a positive step
going from stock to full RS was a huge positive step and then going from RS to full RSR mono-***** was as big a positive step, I see the extra sport bush on the camber links(w/ RS KT and A) w/ either mono-ball or sport rubber toe links as in between RS and RSR
to PSS10....or maybe the MCS 2W right....right? Somebody please just shoot me lol....that would be cheaper. What to do....the 9's are really showing their age and one of the dials broke off years ago for good measure. Bill what are we shopping for next???
#48
Rennlist Member
^^^ At some point it's just not worth it on a 993. Yeah, I got the $15K+ suspension on the faux RS. But today (and I think I posted it elsewhere a few weeks ago), I'm getting a whole MCS takeoff set for the 996 Turbo + everything else Tarrett/track necessity.......for about $2500 of the $7500 "pile of parts" a guy is removing. So I'll be all in on a (worthless) 550 HP 996 Turbo, albeit a Ruf conversion car, for maybe, maybe, maybe $45K.
(Love the comment on bump steer, or lack of, when the cars are set up correctly v. "Stance Nation.")
(Love the comment on bump steer, or lack of, when the cars are set up correctly v. "Stance Nation.")
#49
Rennlist Member
^^^ At some point it's just not worth it on a 993. Yeah, I got the $15K+ suspension on the faux RS. But today (and I think I posted it elsewhere a few weeks ago), I'm getting a whole MCS takeoff set for the 996 Turbo + everything else Tarrett/track necessity.......for about $2500 of the $7500 "pile of parts" a guy is removing. So I'll be all in on a (worthless) 550 HP 996 Turbo, albeit a Ruf conversion car, for maybe, maybe, maybe $45K.
(Love the comment on bump steer, or lack of, when the cars are set up correctly v. "Stance Nation.")
(Love the comment on bump steer, or lack of, when the cars are set up correctly v. "Stance Nation.")
Look, If people want to modify their cars and come here asking for help, lets help them not rehash the same stories and tell them its not worth it. It might not be worth it to you, and thats just fine its not your money. I'm sure everyone knows a new GT3 is faster and better, but this is a 993 bulletin board and we wish/want to discuss how to make our cars better.
Not to pile on, but look at Mr. Verburg's posts and help he provides.
#50
Rennlist Member
As an aside I'll say it's a fantastic configuration, worth the money sad even with the RS carriers you really don't understand the bump steer effect until it's gone. If anyone is looking I have the 2 factory RS tie rods in the picture I bought for sale (brand new).
#51
Burning Brakes
They are not the ones you speak of no and have been on my car with the RS uprights for over a year now. I should have specified this but is something from E.R.P. not Elephant and looks something like this.
#52
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,484
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
11 Posts
E.R.P.s bump steer kit is for 69-89 911. Even their installation page is for those years. Like to see how you set your up.
#53
Burning Brakes
#56
I have stock RSR tie rods w/ the RS wheel carriers a very stiff limited range of motion suspension at RSR height, I'm sure that there is some bump steer present but not enough for me to do anything about it.
The pictures above were from Geoffrey Rings 964 3.8RSR replica, he was a fanatic and went to extremes to refine that car.
#58
Again there isn't a cliff that you fall off
Here's what the suspension curves look like, the dashed blue line is the x-axis w/ 993RS wheel carriers, ideal curve for bump steer is a vertical line worst is a horizontal line, up to ~45° is generally ok, the x-axis is for 160mm front height w/ std carriers, the blue for ~120mm w/ RS carriers, RSR is at ~100mm
w/ stock carriers a drop of 40mm to RS height would place the x-axis at the +40, suspension action would be +/- from there. w/ Rs carriers you goig to be ~+20 and suspension action is +/- from there, You can see this part of the toe curve is steeper which is better for bump steer. Also don't forget the camber and roll center curves which are rarely talked about but are also important.
Here's what the suspension curves look like, the dashed blue line is the x-axis w/ 993RS wheel carriers, ideal curve for bump steer is a vertical line worst is a horizontal line, up to ~45° is generally ok, the x-axis is for 160mm front height w/ std carriers, the blue for ~120mm w/ RS carriers, RSR is at ~100mm
w/ stock carriers a drop of 40mm to RS height would place the x-axis at the +40, suspension action would be +/- from there. w/ Rs carriers you goig to be ~+20 and suspension action is +/- from there, You can see this part of the toe curve is steeper which is better for bump steer. Also don't forget the camber and roll center curves which are rarely talked about but are also important.