Notices
993 Turbo Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The Truth - 993 GT2 Straight Pipes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2021, 04:05 PM
  #16  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,277
Received 520 Likes on 359 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s14kev
OOhh! A technical debate. Me likey! Rennlist wont know what hit them Bill!

That being said, acoustic resonances won't have any measurable effect in a pipe length that is effectively a little over 12 inches. Plus resonant frequency will alter according to gas flow rate so even if it was a miniscule amount of help scavenging the gas flow at certain rates of gas flow, it will impede flow at others. It's been well proven for eons that for turbocharged vehicles, any form of backpressure is detrimental to overall power output. A GT2 will make more power with the GT2 style exhaust removed compared to them being attached all things being equal. Tapering the exhaust down from 3 inches to 2 inches WILL reduce power compared to running a straight 3 inch pipe all the way.

From my vague memory, the real reason GT2 Evo pipes taper is because of FIA homologation regulations. Regs dictate that exhausts can be modified and catalytic converters and mufflers are able to be removed. The only stipulation is that exhaust pipe size remain the original diameter and that the exhaust must exit at the standard location. The GT2 Evo style pipes are designed with this in mind. They route exhaust gas to the standard tailpipe locations in the most efficient (shortest) way possible to reduce exhaust weight and then taper down to the stock exhaust pipe diameter.
I'm not going to argue w/ you

just note that the Burns exhaust specialists disagree w/ most of what you have just written
Old 09-24-2021, 09:45 PM
  #17  
s14kev
Rennlist Member
 
s14kev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 707
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

That makes me sad. I like a good healthy debate and it's a good learning tool for me. I am surprised that Burns disagrees that exhaust backpressure is detrimental to power output in a turbo application.
The following users liked this post:
S.White (09-29-2021)
Old 10-04-2021, 03:12 PM
  #18  
deuce1
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
deuce1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calabasas, CA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for all the feedback guys
Old 11-10-2021, 05:44 PM
  #19  
bergmeister
Advanced
 
bergmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Some interesting comments, the reduction actually produces a little back pressure to control/stop the turbo vanes going supersonic.
Old 08-02-2022, 01:33 AM
  #20  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s14kev
From my vague memory, the real reason GT2 Evo pipes taper is because of FIA homologation regulations. Regs dictate that exhausts can be modified and catalytic converters and mufflers are able to be removed. The only stipulation is that exhaust pipe size remain the original diameter and that the exhaust must exit at the standard location. The GT2 Evo style pipes are designed with this in mind. They route exhaust gas to the standard tailpipe locations in the most efficient (shortest) way possible to reduce exhaust weight and then taper down to the stock exhaust pipe diameter.
The rules are undoubtedly the reason why GT2 Evo straight pipes look the way they do.

Here's a related question, though. Suppose that you install straight pipes without taper, just a short section of 3" or 76mm pipe, in a stock 993 turbo with stock K16 turbochargers. Does the ECU lose control of boost because the wastegate circuit gets saturated? Or does the wastegate circuit in a stock 993 turbo flow enough that the wastegate can control boost even with only atmospheric turbine outlet back pressure?
Old 08-02-2022, 11:52 AM
  #21  
Kein_Ersatz
Rennlist Member
 
Kein_Ersatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Flyoverland - Central, Ohio
Posts: 3,216
Received 244 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Old 08-05-2022, 04:25 AM
  #22  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kein_Ersatz
I’m asking these questions as Johnny-come-quarter-century lately! There seems to be a lot of knowledge here on this board so I figured I’ll ask before making any bonehead moves.

Here’s another question. If you compare say WLS2/S/GT with their respective stock catted exhausts and with these race pipes, how does the boost curve and dyno graph change? Basically, the question I’m trying to ask is how much of a restriction the stock catted exhaust is on these cars?



Quick Reply: The Truth - 993 GT2 Straight Pipes



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:28 PM.