Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Replacement M96 DIY engines under 10k

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2019, 11:57 AM
  #16  
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cleveland Georgia
Posts: 6,968
Received 2,282 Likes on 899 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by soverystout
I would replace all of the valve seats as part of the refurb just due to that being a mode of failure.
Yep, I'd not even consider not doing this, especially with an M96.03 engine.
Old 10-23-2019, 12:00 PM
  #17  
soverystout
Three Wheelin'
 
soverystout's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 1,553
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

With what we now know about the 986/996 engines, getting a new short block from Porsche, changing the oil every 3 months with a Motul or Raby oil, using the low temp thermostat, magnetic drain plug, spin on oil filter adapter, pulling the seals off of the large M97 style bearing, and replacing all associated broken plastics/water pump etc. should provide you with an engine that will provide 200,000 miles of hassle free driving enjoyment.
Old 10-23-2019, 01:22 PM
  #18  
NuttyProfessor
Three Wheelin'
 
NuttyProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,968
Received 218 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by soverystout
With what we now know about the 986/996 engines, getting a new short block from Porsche,
That still give you a Lokasil cylinders which are prone to bore scoring compared to the proven Nikasil bores, correct?
The following 2 users liked this post by NuttyProfessor:
Coopduc (10-23-2019), jimham968 (07-19-2020)
Old 10-23-2019, 02:27 PM
  #19  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,054
Received 806 Likes on 544 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NuttyProfessor
That still give you a Lokasil cylinders which are prone to bore scoring compared to the proven Nikasil bores, correct?
Correct but when would that start to happen?
With what we now know I would think one could minimize and prolong the issue from starting.

And for what it's worth, I would not pay more than $6-$7K for a good (I've seen and heard it run w/compression test) used motor.
The following users liked this post:
soverystout (10-25-2019)
Old 10-23-2019, 02:37 PM
  #20  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,054
Received 806 Likes on 544 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NuttyProfessor
That still give you a Lokasil cylinders which are prone to bore scoring compared to the proven Nikasil bores, correct?
Some of these motors have gone 2-300k miles without issue.
The following 2 users liked this post by 808Bill:
Projekt EPiK (10-28-2019), soverystout (10-25-2019)
Old 10-23-2019, 02:48 PM
  #21  
NuttyProfessor
Three Wheelin'
 
NuttyProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,968
Received 218 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 808Bill
Some of these motors have gone 2-300k miles without issue.
I would like to think that Porsche indirectly admitted to the M96/M97 Lokasil problem just like they did with the IMS fiasco until people banded together. They had proven nikasil bores in the all the air-coolend engines as well as the M96/M97 Turbo,GT2, and GT3 models that didn't suffer from the scoring problem. Alusil seems to follow the same fate as Navarro, Bazhart, and Raby have pointed out many times. Nikasil is still the one to go with... you add piston pin offset issue and that's enough for me to say "no thank you". Many people will claim these engines don't have problems until they have problems.
The following users liked this post:
carlvs (10-23-2019)
Old 10-23-2019, 03:03 PM
  #22  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,081
Received 4,362 Likes on 1,974 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NuttyProfessor
That still give you a Lokasil cylinders which are prone to bore scoring compared to the proven Nikasil bores, correct?
Originally Posted by 808Bill
Correct but when would that start to happen?
With what we now know I would think one could minimize and prolong the issue from starting.
There are countless numbers of Lokasil cylinders out there with over 200k miles, yes Nikasil is a proven coating for aluminum cylinders, I'm sure the LN/Millenium m96 cylinders will get to a high mileage.BTW what is the highest mileage posted for the m96 Nikasil cylinders to date?

Nikasil is not without it's flaws/risks, sulfer is one that corrodes Nikasil, I have seen numerous cases of flaking of the edges. Don't get me wrong, I love Nikasil and Millenium does a good job, I have used them for years. Nikasil/ aluminum cylinders are lightweight, better ring seal, less friction, and gives a few more pony's, but is not perfect, and is the most expensive process.

Nodular Iron is more stable, higher strength, more durable, but heavier and will loose a few pony's and a little fuel efficiency, the main reasons why all the other materials are being used . The constant chase for fuel efficiency lighweight, and sometimes just for the little extra power. I'm OK with carrying a little extra weight, giving up a little efficency and pony's for a rock solid bottom end.
Old 10-25-2019, 04:21 PM
  #23  
soverystout
Three Wheelin'
 
soverystout's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 1,553
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NuttyProfessor
That still give you a Lokasil cylinders which are prone to bore scoring compared to the proven Nikasil bores, correct?
True, but diligent service intervals would make this a non issue. I know many newer gen Porsche owners who still scoff at oil changes before 15K miles because "its expensive" and the put Kumho tires on their car because they are cheaper than N spec or Porsche approved tires.

If you own a car that was big $$$ brand new, it will take some big $$ to properly maintain unless you can do it yourself.

With all of the low mileage 996 out there (which I wouldn't touch), most likely, those cars sat and were rarely driven for years, let alone getting oil changes every 6 months.
Old 10-26-2019, 04:02 PM
  #24  
islaTurbine
Drifting
 
islaTurbine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The ATL
Posts: 2,651
Received 394 Likes on 253 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by soverystout
True, but diligent service intervals would make this a non issue. I know many newer gen Porsche owners who still scoff at oil changes before 15K miles because "its expensive" and the put Kumho tires on their car because they are cheaper than N spec or Porsche approved tires.

If you own a car that was big $$$ brand new, it will take some big $$ to properly maintain unless you can do it yourself.

With all of the low mileage 996 out there (which I wouldn't touch), most likely, those cars sat and were rarely driven for years, let alone getting oil changes every 6 months.
I’m not sure I understand how more frequent oil change intervals will have an impact on bore scoring and ovalization due to connecting rod offsets and poor cylinder liner coatings?
Old 10-26-2019, 05:54 PM
  #25  
pdxmotorhead
Three Wheelin'
 
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA/Oregon
Posts: 1,675
Received 395 Likes on 293 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by islaTurbine
I’m not sure I understand how more frequent oil change intervals will have an impact on bore scoring and ovalization due to connecting rod offsets and poor cylinder liner coatings?
My take..
You have to assume either the whole design is beyond saving,, or that it can be taken care of ,,
Regular oil changes keep the PH of the oil under control. So your minimizing corrosion and breakdown
of the wear surfaces.. While the piston offset is an issue, you can minimize that by not lugging the engine,
The ovalization thing well,, it is what it is,, Upside is the Nickies or the Hartech ring both fix it,, but at a cost..
The quality of the cylinder Alloy is likely one of the big players in that problem.

My 03 has 115K on the clock, ready for its second oil change and baseline oil test. We shall see..
I know I have my fingers crossed..
The following 2 users liked this post by pdxmotorhead:
islaTurbine (10-26-2019), soverystout (10-28-2019)
Old 10-27-2019, 05:10 PM
  #26  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,464
Received 1,079 Likes on 562 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by islaTurbine
I’m not sure I understand how more frequent oil change intervals will have an impact on bore scoring and ovalization due to connecting rod offsets and poor cylinder liner coatings?
I have stacks of papers published in peer reviewed engineering journals that directly point to the fact that oil has a huge part in all of this. Time permitting I've been digesting them into a condensed form which I plan on sharing, but it's been a project I've been working on the last 11 months.

Based on the available research, higher ZDDP and moly levels along with increased HTHS vis would seem to help extend the UMW (ultra mild wear) regime for aluminum bores.

A paper published by Toyota that I came across this morning indicates that sulfur in fuels and interactions at low engine temperatures below 40C create acids that cause accelerated wear in MMC bores, like Lokasil and Alusil.

Although some think it's extreme, more frequent oil changes are the best step to extend the usable life. Those cars driven in cold climates or very short distances where the oil never gets to temp are those cars that will have the highest bore and ring wear.
The following 3 users liked this post by Charles Navarro:
GC996 (01-29-2023), Gingerman (12-14-2019), Kodiak535 (10-29-2019)
Old 10-27-2019, 07:27 PM
  #27  
islaTurbine
Drifting
 
islaTurbine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The ATL
Posts: 2,651
Received 394 Likes on 253 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charles Navarro
I have stacks of papers published in peer reviewed engineering journals that directly point to the fact that oil has a huge part in all of this. Time permitting I've been digesting them into a condensed form which I plan on sharing, but it's been a project I've been working on the last 11 months.

Based on the available research, higher ZDDP and moly levels along with increased HTHS vis would seem to help extend the UMW (ultra mild wear) regime for aluminum bores.

A paper published by Toyota that I came across this morning indicates that sulfur in fuels and interactions at low engine temperatures below 40C create acids that cause accelerated wear in MMC bores, like Lokasil and Alusil.

Although some think it's extreme, more frequent oil changes are the best step to extend the usable life. Those cars driven in cold climates or very short distances where the oil never gets to temp are those cars that will have the highest bore and ring wear.
Excellent info!
Old 10-29-2019, 02:11 AM
  #28  
pdxmotorhead
Three Wheelin'
 
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA/Oregon
Posts: 1,675
Received 395 Likes on 293 Posts
Default

Exactly what I'd expect ,, moisture + sulphur + heat= acid..
Investing in a oil heater for the sump might be a thing if you live in
a cool climate. They sell them in dirt track catalogs for heating up dry sump tanks.
They don't take long, a 2 gallon tank and heater its 160 in < 10 minutes.
They are a silicone rubber pad with heat wires inside..
Old 10-29-2019, 05:15 AM
  #29  
Os7213
Racer
 
Os7213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Qc,Canada
Posts: 272
Received 37 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pdxmotorhead
Exactly what I'd expect ,, moisture + sulphur + heat= acid..
Investing in a oil heater for the sump might be a thing if you live in
a cool climate. They sell them in dirt track catalogs for heating up dry sump tanks.
They don't take long, a 2 gallon tank and heater its 160 in < 10 minutes.
They are a silicone rubber pad with heat wires inside..
I remember those pads.
If my memory is good they are about 4-5 inch long and are usually 500-1000 watts.
They are peel and stick but need to be sealed with silicone.
The only problem I can see is the surface of the M96 pan is not smooth and have ridges so it might be harder to have the pad stick to it.

I do live in cold climate so we are used to see theses system either for oil pan but mostly for coolant which is a probe type heater but I never expected I would need one of those as I dont drive the car during winter months. The coldest temperature the car would see here is around 42 deg F.
Im now wondering if you heat up the oil, let say an hour before running the engine, will it release the moisture from the oil without eliminating it as it would normally if you would drive the car for an hour?

Last edited by Os7213; 10-30-2019 at 04:00 AM.
Old 10-29-2019, 11:04 AM
  #30  
details
Instructor
 
details's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 148
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pdxmotorhead
Exactly what I'd expect ,, moisture + sulphur + heat= acid..
Investing in a oil heater for the sump might be a thing if you live in
a cool climate. They sell them in dirt track catalogs for heating up dry sump tanks.
They don't take long, a 2 gallon tank and heater its 160 in < 10 minutes.
They are a silicone rubber pad with heat wires inside..
Interesting idea. I may give one of these heaters a try since I daily mine...


Quick Reply: Replacement M96 DIY engines under 10k



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:38 PM.