Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Wanted to take a moment to introduce a new jack stand for our cars...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2016, 12:48 AM
  #31  
gyrfalcon
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
gyrfalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by billyboy
Subscribed
Much appreciated!
gyrfalcon is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 12:21 PM
  #32  
FRUNKenstein
Rennlist Member
 
FRUNKenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 6,013
Received 297 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

In as one of the first 20 so I qualify for the group buy 50% discount. Thanks!

(BTW, are you sure you're a 993 guy? In the video you don't look all that old.)
FRUNKenstein is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 01:16 PM
  #33  
gyrfalcon
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
gyrfalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kcattorney
In as one of the first 20 so I qualify for the group buy 50% discount. Thanks!

(BTW, are you sure you're a 993 guy? In the video you don't look all that old.)
Lol thank you!!! I'm in my 40's though; do I qualify?
gyrfalcon is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 01:38 PM
  #34  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,826
Received 75 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gyrfalcon
Thank you very much!

I appreciate you sharing your thoughts on the pins as well, as we've had some concerns expressed to us about how weak they appear to be.

Those current pins are 1/4" steel and each is in double sheer and capable of sustaining up to 19Kn (1.9 metric tons of force per pin). Each pin will only need to bear half the weight of whatever each stand is supporting, so you would have to load 4 metric tons on EACH stand before you approach pin failure. Considering that the stands are rated to 2 tons/pair, that gives you a safety factor of 4 for each pin.
It looks like you have some mech engineering talent doing your design verification. Would suggest you do some actual tests under both static and dynamic(drop test) with the rig. I also suggest you test until failure and see how the product fails. Some times things break in ways we never considered like the windows blowing out of the Comet pressurized aircraft back in the 50s. (BTW, the 'n' is for Newton in SI and should be cap; '19KN')
docmirror is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 02:38 PM
  #35  
CarlOrton
Instructor
 
CarlOrton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gyrfalcon
Thank you very much!

I appreciate you sharing your thoughts on the pins as well, as we've had some concerns expressed to us about how weak they appear to be.

Those current pins are 1/4" steel and each is in double sheer and capable of sustaining up to 19Kn (1.9 metric tons of force per pin). Each pin will only need to bear half the weight of whatever each stand is supporting, so you would have to load 4 metric tons on EACH stand before you approach pin failure. Considering that the stands are rated to 2 tons/pair, that gives you a safety factor of 4 for each pin.

Still, we want the stands to appear every bit as strong as they are, so we will most likely go with larger diameter pins in the production model.

Thanks again!
I'm not a mechanical engineer nor a physicist, but I do know that when something is "dropped" from a distance, the increase in load is not linear. Folks *are* going to drop their cars onto these stands, regardless of what you state in your instructions. Even from 3-4", I'm thinking that the load will be greater than 8,000 lbs. Not bashing your design. Just need to really pound the snot of them during development to ensure that you've addressed folks' subconscious concerns.
CarlOrton is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 02:48 PM
  #36  
FRUNKenstein
Rennlist Member
 
FRUNKenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 6,013
Received 297 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gyrfalcon
Lol thank you!!! I'm in my 40's though; do I qualify?
Not even close. Are you sure it's a 993 you own? You seem pretty friendly and reasonable. Here in the 996 forum, we envision that most of the lawnmower engined/"It's not a real 911 if it's watercooled" owners are more like this:


BTW, I concur with the redundant pin comment. All that weight being held up by one pin manufactured who knows where with me laying underneath the car? Makes me a little nervous, especially if I'm using them to work on a much heavier vehicle.
FRUNKenstein is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 03:05 PM
  #37  
bfong00
Intermediate
 
bfong00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

subscribed! Could have used this many times in the past.
bfong00 is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 03:05 PM
  #38  
gyrfalcon
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
gyrfalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docmirror
It looks like you have some mech engineering talent doing your design verification. Would suggest you do some actual tests under both static and dynamic(drop test) with the rig. I also suggest you test until failure and see how the product fails. Some times things break in ways we never considered like the windows blowing out of the Comet pressurized aircraft back in the 50s. (BTW, the 'n' is for Newton in SI and should be cap; '19KN')
Thank you for your suggestion, and I agree with you. For the production version, we have been planning to actually destroy several before releasing them to the public, not only so that we know where they might fail, but also to ensure consistency in the manufacturing process.

As a sidenote regarding just the prototype, during testing a professional mechanic accidentally let the jack slip and dropped a Ford F350 (the heavy end) with the stand in place, and we were expecting it to flatten. Incredibly the protoype held without any visual signs of failure. Needless to say we disccarded that prototype anyway just to be safe, but rest assured the actual production model will be tested thoroughly and rated appropriately.

Thanks again!
gyrfalcon is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 03:15 PM
  #39  
gyrfalcon
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
gyrfalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CarlOrton
I'm not a mechanical engineer nor a physicist, but I do know that when something is "dropped" from a distance, the increase in load is not linear. Folks *are* going to drop their cars onto these stands, regardless of what you state in your instructions. Even from 3-4", I'm thinking that the load will be greater than 8,000 lbs. Not bashing your design. Just need to really pound the snot of them during development to ensure that you've addressed folks' subconscious concerns.
No worries at all! I appreciate your concern!

Agreed completely, and though we've both deliberately, and accidentally tested the prototypes as mentioned just above, the production version will be run through the rigors with our intent do destroy several of them to test their true limits and to ensure consistency in manufacturing quality. We're pretty obsessive over here which is probably evident in our design, with safety being the utmost concern, and we want to be able to sleep at night knowing we've engineered a solid margin of safety into the stands.

Just another thing I wanted to mention, we also tested the design on uneven surfaces under load, and though that is outside of recommended use for any jack stand, we felt it necessary to engineer a large safety margin in that respect as well.

Again, the production version will be tested to even greater extremes. You're going to receive one of the most thoroughly tested jackstands on the planet.

Thanks again!

Last edited by gyrfalcon; 10-26-2016 at 04:46 PM.
gyrfalcon is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 03:15 PM
  #40  
gyrfalcon
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
gyrfalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bfong00
subscribed! Could have used this many times in the past.
Much appreciated!
gyrfalcon is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 03:15 PM
  #41  
5CHN3LL
Race Director
 
5CHN3LL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SOcialist republic of CALifornia
Posts: 10,423
Received 211 Likes on 155 Posts
Default

Designing by committee is guaranteed to double your costs and push your ship date back at least 3 years.

Looking forward to seeing this product for sale. Once it's for sale and I acquire a pair (of jackstands, Gnat), I'll try very hard not to drop my 911 on it from a height exceeding 4 inches, even though I've never dropped a car onto a jack stand in the 30+ years I've been old enough to work on cars with jack stands.

Last edited by 5CHN3LL; 10-26-2016 at 03:46 PM.
5CHN3LL is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 03:26 PM
  #42  
gyrfalcon
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
gyrfalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kcattorney
Not even close. Are you sure it's a 993 you own? You seem pretty friendly and reasonable. Here in the 996 forum, we envision that most of the lawnmower engined/"It's not a real 911 if it's watercooled" owners are more like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgP4rEL8rSs

BTW, I concur with the redundant pin comment. All that weight being held up by one pin manufactured who knows where with me laying underneath the car? Makes me a little nervous, especially if I'm using them to work on a much heavier vehicle.
Hahahaha, reminds me of a cars and coffee I attended once. Well, in 30 or so years I'll be right there with the guys in the video, so maybe my 993 puts me ahead of the curve. Keep this here in the watercooled forums, but I'm actually thinking about adding a 996 or 997 to the fold in the future. Sacrilege!!!

Noted regarding the pins, and thanks to you as well for sharing that concern. That will be remedied in the production version.
gyrfalcon is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 03:37 PM
  #43  
gyrfalcon
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
gyrfalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 5CHN3LL
Designing by committee is guaranteed to double your costs and push your ship back date at least 3 years.

Looking forward to seeing this product for sale. Once it's for sale and I acquire a pair (of jackstands, Gnat), I'll try very hard not to drop my 911 on it from a height exceeding 4 inches, even though I've never dropped a car onto a jack stand in the 30+ years I've been old enough to work on cars with jack stands.
It just might! Don't know if we can do another 3 years of designing and testing these things with over 3 under our belts already lol.

Much appreciated, and I'm looking forward to finally getting them out there!
gyrfalcon is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 04:12 PM
  #44  
JMLavoie
Racer
 
JMLavoie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

For those with lowered suspensions such as H&R springs, the use of a low profile jack will be required and even then, it could be that a pre-wheel jacking as you described above, might still be required.
Certainly not a show-stopper, but a hindrance!
Great idea by the way!
JMLavoie is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 04:34 PM
  #45  
gyrfalcon
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
gyrfalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JMLavoie
For those with lowered suspensions such as H&R springs, the use of a low profile jack will be required and even then, it could be that a pre-wheel jacking as you described above, might still be required.
Certainly not a show-stopper, but a hindrance!
Great idea by the way!
That's true, there's only so much space we can work with to clear both the stand and the jack with very lowered vehicles. Mine clears just fine, but it's closer to the upper end of RS height for the 993. In any case I hope, as you said, that it's not a show-stopper as they still get the full benefit of the stands by using that extra step. One another thing that you can do that will give you just that bit of extra clearance when it's close, is to remove the rubber pad on your jack saddle and drop the stand's center piece in the pad's place. It's designed to do that.

Thanks so much for the feedback and the compliment!
gyrfalcon is offline  


Quick Reply: Wanted to take a moment to introduce a new jack stand for our cars...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:02 PM.