Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

High number of range 2 ove revs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2020, 04:51 PM
  #1  
Tom Loder
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Tom Loder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 981
Received 429 Likes on 215 Posts
Default High number of range 2 ove revs

How catastrophic is the report. It is from a primarily track only car
Old 12-29-2020, 05:40 PM
  #2  
craina
Rennlist Member
 
craina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 455
Received 129 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

That does seem like a lot. I would want to see compression and leak down.
Old 12-29-2020, 06:12 PM
  #3  
hollmatt
Rennlist Member
 
hollmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 222
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

That is alot. On the 6GT3 with only 2 overrev ranges you don't actually know if the range 2's were 8000+ rpm ones or 9500 rpm ones...with later GT3's you could determine that. Leakdown and compression are good to do regardless but could still come back good and then bearings might be on the way out if the overrev was a high one. Oil samples if they have them could tell you something if high in lead (bearings). Also if a track car as you stated does it have AIM system/sensors as these can record the overrev and could be more specific on the rpm if went too. Bottom line if it was me i'd budget for an engine refresh at some point if the rest of the car is clean and build that into your offer.
Old 12-29-2020, 07:03 PM
  #4  
Rootwitch
Racer
 
Rootwitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 265
Received 57 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Cam deviation was recommended to me as another way to look for obvious problems.
Old 12-29-2020, 07:15 PM
  #5  
AudiOn19s
Race Car
 
AudiOn19s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 4,511
Received 46 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Does the car possibly have an aftermarket ecu flash with a higher rev limit.
Old 12-29-2020, 07:45 PM
  #6  
himself
Rennlist Member
 
himself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,736
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Some of those Range 2 appear to have happened just a little while ago as well. At 666 hours. Report was at 672.

Also keep in mind that there are 3 ignitions per rev. So - if my math is right - at 8800 rpm (where range 2 starts) there are 440 ignitions per second. That report has over 12000 range 2. That’s almost 30 seconds of range 2 living at 8800 ROM. And, at 10,000 rpm, it’s still over 20 seconds of Range 2. No way to know exactly how it unfolded, but IMO, seems like a lot.

I’d definitely check the car out if this is a PPI.

-td

Last edited by himself; 12-30-2020 at 04:01 PM.
The following users liked this post:
hollmatt (12-29-2020)
Old 12-29-2020, 09:14 PM
  #7  
Tom Loder
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Tom Loder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 981
Received 429 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Does the car possibly have an aftermarket ecu flash with a higher rev limit.

That is a good question. I will have them check the rev limiter to see if it goes past 7800.
Old 12-29-2020, 09:40 PM
  #8  
Rootwitch
Racer
 
Rootwitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 265
Received 57 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom Loder
That is a good question. I will have them check the rev limiter to see if it goes past 7800.
How do you interpret range 1 and range 2 over-revs if a tune has modified the rev limit?
I am curious about this, as my 996.2 GT3 has the EVOMSit 93 octane tune, and it is possible that this tune raised the rev limit from stock 8200 RPM to 8400 RPM.

Old 12-29-2020, 10:09 PM
  #9  
Tom Loder
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Tom Loder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 981
Received 429 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rootwitch
How do you interpret range 1 and range 2 over-revs if a tune has modified the rev limit?
I am curious about this, as my 996.2 GT3 has the EVOMSit 93 octane tune, and it is possible that this tune raised the rev limit from stock 8200 RPM to 8400 RPM.

I would think they would be less concerning as you could easily do that without a mechanical over rev.
Old 12-29-2020, 10:12 PM
  #10  
Tom Loder
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Tom Loder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 981
Received 429 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by himself
Some of those Range 2 appear to have happened just a little while ago as well. At 666 hours. Report was at 672.

Also keep in mind that there are 3 ignitions per rev. So - if my math is right - at 8800 rpm (where range 2 starts) there are 440 ignitions per second. That report has over 12000 range 2. That’s almost seconds of range 2 living at 8800 ROM. And, at 10,000 rpm, it’s still over 20 seconds of Range 2. No way to know exactly how it unfolded, but IMO, seems like a lot.

I’d definitely check the car out if this is a PPI.

-td
doesn't the number indicate total over revs in range 2? and the hour just lets you know when the last incident was? I which case it could've been 3 seconds at 10 different times for example.
Old 12-29-2020, 10:28 PM
  #11  
Rootwitch
Racer
 
Rootwitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 265
Received 57 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom Loder
I would think they would be less concerning as you could easily do that without a mechanical over rev.
Would a rev limit change by a tune really mean much of anything? If it is raised to 8400 RPM, then range 1 would be <8400 RPM and range 2 would be >8400 RPM right?
A car with a raised rev limit might theoretically have spent some time in the 8200-8400 RPM range just by hitting the rev limiter.
But 8400 RPM is not dangerous for the 996.2 GT3 engine, as I understand. Of course, if you do a money shift it's going to show up as range 2 either way.

The other possibility is that a tune might change the rev limit to say 8400 RPM, but the DME is still recording range limits at 8200 RPM.
If that were the case, you might end up with a lot of range 2 over-revs that are really only 8200-8400 RPM, and not that concerning.


Old 12-29-2020, 10:29 PM
  #12  
Tom Loder
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Tom Loder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 981
Received 429 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rootwitch
The other possibility is that a tune might change the rev limit to say 8400 RPM, but the DME is still recording range limits at 8200 RPM.
If that were the case, you might end up with a lot of range 2 over-revs that are really only 8200-8400 RPM, and not that concerning.
Bingo!
Old 12-29-2020, 11:22 PM
  #13  
Rootwitch
Racer
 
Rootwitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 265
Received 57 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom Loder
Bingo!
Cool, glad to understand how that works.

On the car you're looking at, whether it has a tune or not, it appears to have had spirited driving fairly recently, last 5-6 hours.
I think you're right that you don't know if these recent events are just a few ignitions, or if they were several seconds worth.
A mostly track car wouldn't necessarily be bad, since some of them that I know of are exquisitely maintained, beautiful cars with fairly low miles.
But there's a possibility that some not-so-good things happened recently, so a good PPI along with trying to learn about the car's history would help.
Old 12-30-2020, 06:17 AM
  #14  
spiller
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
spiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 2,534
Received 333 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

12000 does seem unusually high for range 2. Ive heard of cup cars spending accumulative minutes at 10K plus but they have a more stout cam set up than the road going GT3. Leak down and compression definitely as others have said, but they still won’t tell you the full story. I’m more lax with overrevs than probably some others (I think there’s a lot of misunderstanding and overhyped DME reports out there) but I’d be doing all due diligence before proceeding with this one.
Old 12-30-2020, 09:25 AM
  #15  
mnwild
Rennlist Member
 
mnwild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 278
Received 41 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom Loder
How catastrophic is the report. It is from a primarily track only car
65,535 is 16 bit max value. My DME had exact same number for range 1, I'm assuming then that range 1 is at max count? Mine also had large range 2 count at 4888 but after doing some research online, found a long posting on modified ECUs causing inflated DME readings,which some have stated here already. I later found an old online auction listing stating the car had a modified ECU so for myself, chalked the large range 2 up to that, but time will tell, may be the wrong conclusion...

Odd thing about my DME report, there was no 3rd line for operating hours counter and where the VIN usually is said GT2 unknown/2003. I'm assuming modified ECU results in this


Quick Reply: High number of range 2 ove revs



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:52 AM.