![]() |
classifieds |
membership |
rennlist |
photo album     sponsors | upload photo | chat | marketplace     |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Dealer Listings | My Recent Topics | Vendor Directory |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Addict
Rennlist Member Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,678
|
I am running stock springs (which I think are 228#/543#) and want to experiment with some stiffer ones. I currently run R6s, so I don't think extremely stiff ones are going to work - maybe 600#/1000# at most for my test.
If anyone has some stiffer springs lying around I can buy/test, please PM me. Thanks! -td |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rennlist F1 Professor Emeritus
PhD, No BS Rennlist Member Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,609
|
I've been looking into this too and from what I've been told, a 100 to 200 # spread between the front and rear is desireable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Addict
Rennlist Member Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wake Zone Coffee House in Apex, NC
Posts: 17,443
|
On the "softer" side I would suggest a 550/700 option or if you are set on 600 up front run an 800 in the rear. On the stiffer side I would suggest a 900/1100 option. NO WAY would I run a 400# split.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Addict
Rennlist Member Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,678
|
Quote:
![]() Also, why wouldn't a 400# spread be workable? The factory split is over 300# already. -td |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Addict
Rennlist Member Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wake Zone Coffee House in Apex, NC
Posts: 17,443
|
A couple things. First, the 300# split isn't really a 300# split and you are looking at linear and progressive springs. Second, the 400 split would run the front really soft and the rear really stiff. Can you saw lots of oversteer?
As far as you spring choice it should be dictated by roughly three things (obviously more than this but these are the obvious). (1) driving style; (2)current dampers; (3)tire choice (remember, tires have their own spring rate). What dampers are you running? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Rennlist F1 Professor Emeritus
PhD, No BS Rennlist Member Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,609
|
IIRC, the front stock springs are progressive. In addition to what Dell said, if there is a large spread in spring rates front to rear your more prone to a lot of nose dive under heavy braking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Addict
Rennlist Member Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wake Zone Coffee House in Apex, NC
Posts: 17,443
|
Pete, other way around.....the fronts are linear and the rears are progressive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Addict
Rennlist Member Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,464
|
600/800 for R6 and street use, not too soft, not too hard either.
I ran 750/1000 and felt too stiff for street use. I also ran 450/650, very nice for street, autoX and worked well on tracks. Get the shocks revalved for the new springs, otherwise you're just running a stiffer car that won't work better, because you won't have enough bump/rebound control for such higher spring rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Addict
Rennlist Member Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 1,280
|
Quote:
the spring rate question in general is a good one though. 600/800 is what Moton suggests and seems to be what most run however some very quick cars on here were running different rates than that. 171mph had 600/900, rad had 750/1000, I think I even remember one setup with more front spring than rear. Lots of variables in there though. The advertised rates on my 996 were 450/900 but I always doubted thouse were truely accurate. It was neutral but didn't try to spin out as the rates would make you think
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Addict
Rennlist Member Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 158
|
Does anyone have the wheel rates or motion ratios for the front and rear on the GT3? This would add some more tech to the discussion.
Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Addict
Rennlist Member Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 880
|
NJ-GT,
I'm not sure what you mean. Are you saying that for street use, or for track use with R6s, you recommend 600/800? When you ran 750/1000, were you using R6s also? Which felt better to you, if that were the case?
__________________
Chuck Price 2004 GT3 White '96 Polar Silver 993 '87 911 Red |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Addict
Rennlist Member Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wake Zone Coffee House in Apex, NC
Posts: 17,443
|
Depends on what your use of the car is going to be. Street more? Track more? 50/50? etc?
As another data point I have run several different spring combos on mine and the latest setup was 900/1100 and while it wasn't unbearable on the street is was definitely not comfortable any time I hit road that was imperfect. I would run something like 550/700 or 600/800 if the car will get a descent amount of street time. As Rad said (which is why I asked what dampers you were running) you need to make sure and revalve yours if they are still stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Rennlist F1 Professor Emeritus
PhD, No BS Rennlist Member Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,609
|
From what I understand, you also have to insert a tender spring and some kind of hat or top perch?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Addict
Rennlist Member Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,464
|
Quote:
Reuse your stock hats, use gemini isolators (very nice stuff) and zero rate tenders (ultra thin and decently long). 60mm I.D. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Addict
Rennlist Member Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On Rennlist avoiding work
Posts: 1,784
|
remember to use the correct spring lengths. I run 6" in the rear and 4" in the front but I have custom built Motons and I'm super low. Lex at Moton recommends 6"in, he built mine personally.
run 600/800 BTW for Hooters, you can go 800/1000 but I wouldn't stand it on the street. Personal preference on the split. Lex says he likes a 300 split so people don't get in trouble...
__________________
Victor Nationally certified PCA instructor. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|