Going RWD...
#16
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#17
#18
#19
Yes. TBD like wavetrack works fine for street use. For track, a true locking LSD is vastly superior. Either is good for a street car.
#20
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Yes, wavetraq (street) is installed.
#21
The H&R sway bar is solid and way too stiff to use in combination with the OEM front noodle. It makes the car borderline dangerous when driven at the limit even when set full soft. I tried it many years ago. I would use the OEM GT3 4-way rear bar in combination with the OEM GT3 5-way front bar.
Kirk
#22
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Just want to check this part number as the correct one for the thrust bearing before I buy anything:
996 343 501 00
I apparently need to use them with the PSS9s, seems like I should replace them while in there.
Cheers,
996 343 501 00
I apparently need to use them with the PSS9s, seems like I should replace them while in there.
Cheers,
#23
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Ordered.
Cheers,
Last edited by 2fcknfst; 07-21-2023 at 03:16 PM.
#24
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#25
Will the removal of the front differential really realize significant fuel savings? I've managed nearly 30 MPG before on long distance drives. But only if I never exceed 65 MPH, which as everyone here surely knows, is not easy to do. I see that you already have a Wavetrac? which is as others have said is more than enough for a street car and absolutely necessary if you RWD the car. You'll never need to rebuild that TBD either.
Running open differential, is possibly the worst thing anyone could do to these cars VS the stock AWD setup. Still in measured daily street driving, IMHO, you'll never realize any benefits from RWD converting the car. Serious canyon carving? Sure. More fun potential if RWD.
#26
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Well, I'm curious...
Above, my best on a 60 mile loop is 27.7avg, that was after switching over to Kline - 28 even showed. Plus, I have removed a fair chunk of weight already, the extra 82lbs (ish) and the reduction in drag, I would LOVE to see a 30mpg average over my 60 mile loop. That would be cool.
Above, my best on a 60 mile loop is 27.7avg, that was after switching over to Kline - 28 even showed. Plus, I have removed a fair chunk of weight already, the extra 82lbs (ish) and the reduction in drag, I would LOVE to see a 30mpg average over my 60 mile loop. That would be cool.
The following 3 users liked this post by racer959:
#28
Pro
I had a 996 gt2 with the EVO 650 hp kit for a couple of years. It is setup that often truly struggles for traction, and I often thought the car would be better with a little less hp or 4wd… as a bit of feedback. It sort of wrecked the car as a 2wd with that much go. 4wd with boosted 996 hp may be better.
Last edited by MC 968CS; 07-22-2023 at 05:33 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Keo (07-28-2023)
#29
IMO, 996 awd is useless, not sure why people think it adds to the car in any way...there's a reason GT2 and GT3 don't have it
#30
Rennlist Member