Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Going RWD...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2023, 01:56 PM
  #16  
2fcknfst
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
2fcknfst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,733
Likes: 0
Received 3,872 Likes on 2,948 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powdrhound
Make sure you install a proper LSD. That's key..
LSD...?
Old 07-21-2023, 02:10 PM
  #17  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,843
Received 1,732 Likes on 1,008 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2fcknfst
LSD...?
Limited Slip Differential, not the drug…
Old 07-21-2023, 02:10 PM
  #18  
kflee
Intermediate
 
kflee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 43
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2fcknfst
LSD...?
Limited slip differential. I am sure powdrhound is talking about a true LSD like a Guard vs torque biasing wavetrac. Lots of argument on what works well for street/autocross. Most people will not argue that a true LSD is best for the track.
Old 07-21-2023, 02:13 PM
  #19  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,843
Received 1,732 Likes on 1,008 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kflee
Limited slip differential. I am sure powdrhound is talking about a true LSD like a Guard vs torque biasing wavetrac. Lots of argument on what works well for street/autocross. Most people will not argue that a true LSD is best for the track.
Yes. TBD like wavetrack works fine for street use. For track, a true locking LSD is vastly superior. Either is good for a street car.
Old 07-21-2023, 02:29 PM
  #20  
2fcknfst
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
2fcknfst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,733
Likes: 0
Received 3,872 Likes on 2,948 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kflee
Limited slip differential. I am sure powdrhound is talking about a true LSD like a Guard vs torque biasing wavetrac. Lots of argument on what works well for street/autocross. Most people will not argue that a true LSD is best for the track.
That's what I thought, just checkin'...

Yes, wavetraq (street) is installed.
Old 07-21-2023, 02:38 PM
  #21  
kflee
Intermediate
 
kflee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 43
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powdrhound
The H&R sway bar is solid and way too stiff to use in combination with the OEM front noodle. It makes the car borderline dangerous when driven at the limit even when set full soft. I tried it many years ago. I would use the OEM GT3 4-way rear bar in combination with the OEM GT3 5-way front bar.
I have read through most of your posts on suspension, drivetrain, power adders, etc. You have contributed a tremendous amount to the 996 community and I consider you a true expert! A good friend, national autocross champ, track day enthusiast, and HPDE instructor with Chin is running PSS10 with 260 front spring, 672 rear spring, stock front bar, and H&R rear bar set at full stiff. It handles beautifully! However, according to him it was a nightmare to drive before increasing the rear spring rate from the original 515 to 672 regardless of rear bar (he tried the GT3 bar as well).

Kirk
Old 07-21-2023, 02:44 PM
  #22  
2fcknfst
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
2fcknfst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,733
Likes: 0
Received 3,872 Likes on 2,948 Posts
Default

Just want to check this part number as the correct one for the thrust bearing before I buy anything:

996 343 501 00

I apparently need to use them with the PSS9s, seems like I should replace them while in there.

Cheers,
Old 07-21-2023, 03:12 PM
  #23  
2fcknfst
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
2fcknfst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,733
Likes: 0
Received 3,872 Likes on 2,948 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powdrhound
Verify that the Tarrett upper mounts do NOT ad stack height v. OEM. If I'm not mistaken they do which is not what you want as it takes away from shock travel with is at a premium already with PSS9/10s.
Confirmed; they do not add stack height.

Ordered.

Cheers,

Last edited by 2fcknfst; 07-21-2023 at 03:16 PM.
Old 07-21-2023, 03:24 PM
  #24  
2fcknfst
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
2fcknfst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,733
Likes: 0
Received 3,872 Likes on 2,948 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2fcknfst
Just want to check this part number as the correct one for the thrust bearing before I buy anything:

996 343 501 00

I apparently need to use them with the PSS9s, seems like I should replace them while in there.

Cheers,
Ok, ordered these as well.

Cheers,
Old 07-21-2023, 07:32 PM
  #25  
Lazurus
Racer
 
Lazurus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2fcknfst
If I can hit 30mpg at cruise on the highway, it'll be a win for me.

Will the removal of the front differential really realize significant fuel savings? I've managed nearly 30 MPG before on long distance drives. But only if I never exceed 65 MPH, which as everyone here surely knows, is not easy to do. I see that you already have a Wavetrac? which is as others have said is more than enough for a street car and absolutely necessary if you RWD the car. You'll never need to rebuild that TBD either.

Running open differential, is possibly the worst thing anyone could do to these cars VS the stock AWD setup. Still in measured daily street driving, IMHO, you'll never realize any benefits from RWD converting the car. Serious canyon carving? Sure. More fun potential if RWD.
Old 07-21-2023, 10:37 PM
  #26  
2fcknfst
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
2fcknfst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,733
Likes: 0
Received 3,872 Likes on 2,948 Posts
Default

Well, I'm curious...

Above, my best on a 60 mile loop is 27.7avg, that was after switching over to Kline - 28 even showed. Plus, I have removed a fair chunk of weight already, the extra 82lbs (ish) and the reduction in drag, I would LOVE to see a 30mpg average over my 60 mile loop. That would be cool.
Old 07-21-2023, 11:26 PM
  #27  
racer959
Rennlist Member
 
racer959's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,183
Received 311 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Why would anyone be worried about gas mileage with a 996 turbo or any other sports car or exotic.
The following 3 users liked this post by racer959:
diverzeusy (09-26-2023), mrdstr (07-23-2023), wkf94025 (07-29-2023)
Old 07-22-2023, 05:32 AM
  #28  
MC 968CS
Pro
 
MC 968CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 693
Received 139 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

I had a 996 gt2 with the EVO 650 hp kit for a couple of years. It is setup that often truly struggles for traction, and I often thought the car would be better with a little less hp or 4wd… as a bit of feedback. It sort of wrecked the car as a 2wd with that much go. 4wd with boosted 996 hp may be better.

Last edited by MC 968CS; 07-22-2023 at 05:33 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Keo (07-28-2023)
Old 07-22-2023, 12:34 PM
  #29  
993GT
Rennlist Member
 
993GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,757
Received 550 Likes on 336 Posts
Default

IMO, 996 awd is useless, not sure why people think it adds to the car in any way...there's a reason GT2 and GT3 don't have it
The following 2 users liked this post by 993GT:
LinwoodM (07-23-2023), T10Chris (07-24-2023)
Old 07-22-2023, 02:55 PM
  #30  
racer959
Rennlist Member
 
racer959's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,183
Received 311 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 993GT
IMO, 996 awd is useless, not sure why people think it adds to the car in any way...there's a reason GT2 and GT3 don't have it
Useless in what way.


Quick Reply: Going RWD...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:10 PM.