What is the real difference in 996tt X50 vs 996tt s
#1
What is the real difference in 996tt X50 vs 996tt s
I have been looking at some 996tt, and wanted to know everyone's opinion on the difference between the turbo s and the X50. Isn't the hp about the same? Which one should bring more money with all else being equal? How much more? What are these cars worth over a similarly equipped regular tt?
Thanks for the help!
Thanks for the help!
#2
Burning Brakes
Hard to answer question...
If you are a collector, looking to maintain a garage queen with super low miles, and in perfect 'factory stock' condition, then the X50 or S will bring a premium- for the simple reason that they were SLIGHTLY rarer, and represent a higher performance model in Porsche stock trim. HOW much is subject to argument. The X50 for example was $17,880 extra. On an ultra low, 5,000 mile example maybe you add 50%. On a 40k mile driver, maybe 4-5k extra. Similar for the S, however the S is also a 'younger car' hence it has a higher intrinsic or base value.
The S was made in 2005. Compare to the X50 of 2002-2004, and you are 1-3 years younger. All things being equal, the S had brakes, and badging- and therefore more desirable. I'd add 3k per year of difference.
What is the difference between the two? Some say not much, others gush about how rare an S is and the value, etc, etc.
Once you step away from "I will only own a factory stock car and would not consider mods" then the value of an X50 or S is greatly reduced- for the simple reason that you can easily surpass X50/S level performance for relatively low $$.
So what kind of owner will you be, mods wise?
A
If you are a collector, looking to maintain a garage queen with super low miles, and in perfect 'factory stock' condition, then the X50 or S will bring a premium- for the simple reason that they were SLIGHTLY rarer, and represent a higher performance model in Porsche stock trim. HOW much is subject to argument. The X50 for example was $17,880 extra. On an ultra low, 5,000 mile example maybe you add 50%. On a 40k mile driver, maybe 4-5k extra. Similar for the S, however the S is also a 'younger car' hence it has a higher intrinsic or base value.
The S was made in 2005. Compare to the X50 of 2002-2004, and you are 1-3 years younger. All things being equal, the S had brakes, and badging- and therefore more desirable. I'd add 3k per year of difference.
What is the difference between the two? Some say not much, others gush about how rare an S is and the value, etc, etc.
Once you step away from "I will only own a factory stock car and would not consider mods" then the value of an X50 or S is greatly reduced- for the simple reason that you can easily surpass X50/S level performance for relatively low $$.
So what kind of owner will you be, mods wise?
A
#3
Well I'm not sure. When I was into mustangs, I knew I would mod the car. Being that the 996tt already has 420 hp, I'm not sure it "needs" to be modded. I like the fact that the x50 and s model are different, but I wasn't if anyone really gave a rip about them.
#4
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I have been looking at some 996tt, and wanted to know everyone's opinion on the difference between the turbo s and the X50. Isn't the hp about the same? Which one should bring more money with all else being equal? How much more? What are these cars worth over a similarly equipped regular tt?
Thanks for the help!
Thanks for the help!
Have fun.
#5
Drifting
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bastrop By God Texas
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Well for me, I got mine because that is what I always wanted. I don't expect it ever to be a collectible. I want to enjoy it and mod it. I would have already gone for a UMW tune if it wasn't CPO'd.
Yes, 420HP is insane for a car of this size and it is plenty fast, but wouldn't 500+ be better? I'm not a collector so I didn't by a collector car. I bought one in great shape with a few miles, that I won't feel any remorse about personalizing.
For a collector this might be heresey, but then again, I'm not a collector and didn't by a collector car.
Yes, 420HP is insane for a car of this size and it is plenty fast, but wouldn't 500+ be better? I'm not a collector so I didn't by a collector car. I bought one in great shape with a few miles, that I won't feel any remorse about personalizing.
For a collector this might be heresey, but then again, I'm not a collector and didn't by a collector car.
#6
I always wanted a TTS and found one in like new condition with 17K on the clock for a good price. I will probably mod it. I can tell you the S gets quite a bit of attention. I love the car.
#7
Burning Brakes
Really? Over and above the attention a convertible TT would get?
As has been discussed multiple times, Porsche needed something to support sales the last year of a model, so the 2005 was offered as an "s"... they did it in prior models too- a few options are bundled to create a rare and desirable "S" model.
Ceramic brakes, X50 kit, decklid badge- what am I missing? Performance within a few HP, right? (We know a UMW or EPL flash will give you a few more peak HP, the specsmanship of the HP rating on the S is just fiddling with this...really no changes to the motors.)
I mean a turbo S with a brembo BBK, and a UMW Stage 2 and a exhaust is identical to an X50 with the same.
Having said all that- and crapped on you guys that value the S- there is a cachet about saying and owning an S, undeniably- but mostly to people that don't know the lack of real difference. Or once again they value it to keep it stock and factory- (you simply cannot take a TT and make it into an S.) On resale there will be a segment of buyers that value this- but not all.
Get the best car you can- best records, best condition. I got lucky and found an X50...if not I'd surely have done the UMW Stage 2ZCs... but still mine needed mods to unlock the potential of the X50.
And about the power being 'enough'.... Please, what...is your wife reading this????
(I kid, I kid)
A
As has been discussed multiple times, Porsche needed something to support sales the last year of a model, so the 2005 was offered as an "s"... they did it in prior models too- a few options are bundled to create a rare and desirable "S" model.
Ceramic brakes, X50 kit, decklid badge- what am I missing? Performance within a few HP, right? (We know a UMW or EPL flash will give you a few more peak HP, the specsmanship of the HP rating on the S is just fiddling with this...really no changes to the motors.)
I mean a turbo S with a brembo BBK, and a UMW Stage 2 and a exhaust is identical to an X50 with the same.
Having said all that- and crapped on you guys that value the S- there is a cachet about saying and owning an S, undeniably- but mostly to people that don't know the lack of real difference. Or once again they value it to keep it stock and factory- (you simply cannot take a TT and make it into an S.) On resale there will be a segment of buyers that value this- but not all.
Get the best car you can- best records, best condition. I got lucky and found an X50...if not I'd surely have done the UMW Stage 2ZCs... but still mine needed mods to unlock the potential of the X50.
And about the power being 'enough'.... Please, what...is your wife reading this????
(I kid, I kid)
A
Trending Topics
#8
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
In recent years, the S has become nothing more than a marketing and sales creation to reduce inventory of options that didn't sell up to minimum numbers, nothing else.
This has occurred on the Carreras and Cayennes.
As for adding 50%, I would be skeptical....maybe 10%.
This has occurred on the Carreras and Cayennes.
As for adding 50%, I would be skeptical....maybe 10%.
#9
Drifting
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bastrop By God Texas
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Just the plain old TT cab attracts more attention than I want. If it was a S I don't think I could stand the attention .
I was actually looking for a clean, mechanically sound 997 S cab without a black interior. I just stumbled on the one in my avatar and fell in love with it once I started researching the 996TT.
I actually am more jealous of the color combination of Fodowski's car than I am the S designation.
I was actually looking for a clean, mechanically sound 997 S cab without a black interior. I just stumbled on the one in my avatar and fell in love with it once I started researching the 996TT.
I actually am more jealous of the color combination of Fodowski's car than I am the S designation.
#10
Rennlist Member
Well, not entirely with the Cayenne S. The differences between the regular Cayenne and the "S" version are significant. The biggest being an additional 2 cylinders in the motor,
#11
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lipstick on a P!g ...
#12
Rennlist Member
I believe the X50 (or S) model has slightly larger turbos. When combined with Kevin's (UMW) chip and his wastegate/DV kits, you can get more out of the x-50 than with a "regular" 996tt having done the same mods--for instance Kevin recommends the wastegate kit for x-50's but not so much for the non-x-50 as its not as significant upgrade in power for the non-x50. At least, thats how I understand it.
So, if you will modify the car, it is my understanding that you can amplify the power to a larger degree with the x-50 car all things being equal. I would recommend you confirm this with Kevin, but thats my understanding of it.
So, if you will modify the car, it is my understanding that you can amplify the power to a larger degree with the x-50 car all things being equal. I would recommend you confirm this with Kevin, but thats my understanding of it.
#14
#15
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member