Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

High Altitude Power Loss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2006, 11:35 PM
  #1  
Azurro_California_911
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Azurro_California_911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default High Altitude Power Loss

Does anyone know, of is there a formulation, to calculate the loss of power due to higher altitude in naturally aspirated engines. I notice a big difference when I am driving at sea level, as opposed to driving in Reno, NV, altitude 4500 feet.

JFS

Last edited by Azurro_California_911; 02-14-2006 at 12:45 AM.
Old 02-13-2006, 11:58 PM
  #2  
MJones
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
MJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Google is so cool > search > altitude hp loss
http://www.wallaceracing.com/braking-hp.php
Plus a bunch more
Old 02-14-2006, 12:07 AM
  #3  
Azurro_California_911
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Azurro_California_911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MJones
Google is so cool > search > altitude hp loss
http://www.wallaceracing.com/braking-hp.php
Plus a bunch more
Wow according to Wallace Racing there is roughly a 13% loss in power, interesting. Thanks
Old 02-14-2006, 12:15 AM
  #4  
Vintage
Intermediate
 
Vintage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Provo, Utah
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That high altitude horsepower loss really sucks, doesn't it Azurro. I live at the same elevation you do and there definitely is a difference from sea level. I believe, though, that turbocharged engines overcome some of that loss because more oxygen is being crammed into the cylinders. MJones, are you listening? Do you know if that is true and if so, how effective are turbos at overcoming the effect of high altitude? According to your calculator above, we lose 47 HP at 4500 feet. That is a lot!!
Old 02-14-2006, 12:35 AM
  #5  
Azurro_California_911
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Azurro_California_911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vintage
That high altitude horsepower loss really sucks, doesn't it Azurro. I live at the same elevation you do and there definitely is a difference from sea level. I believe, though, that turbocharged engines overcome some of that loss because more oxygen is being crammed into the cylinders. MJones, are you listening? Do you know if that is true and if so, how effective are turbos at overcoming the effect of high altitude? According to your calculator above, we lose 47 HP at 4500 feet. That is a lot!!
You are correct Vintage, the turbo compensates with the forced induction. I don't know what the power loss is at altitude, but from my experience the turbo feel as strong at different elevations.
Old 02-14-2006, 01:15 AM
  #6  
mbodo
Racer
 
mbodo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Depending on the output of the turbo and what pressure the wastegate is set at, your turbo could continue to provide "maximum boost" at very high altitudes. Case in point, a lot of light aircraft single/multi engine piston aircraft don't see a power loss until over 15-18,000 feet, albeit these turbos are really only putting out enough pressure to compensate for the lack of atmosphere at altitude. I think anything above 12,000 or there abouts requires bottled oxygen for operators.
Old 09-28-2006, 04:34 PM
  #7  
Paul523
Pro
 
Paul523's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Does a supercharged engine suffer the same proportional power loss at altitude due to oxygen deprivation as a normally aspirated engine since the SC is chain/belt driven from the crank, or does SC compensate like a turbo?
Getting dumb and dumber as I get older..

I'm thinking of buying a Shelby GT500 to keep at our place in Colorado.
Old 09-28-2006, 04:53 PM
  #8  
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
 
Edgy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 17,699
Received 229 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

According to that I need a GT3 to keep Carrera S power levels in Denver!
Old 09-28-2006, 05:01 PM
  #9  
rdstemler
Burning Brakes
 
rdstemler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You have to do what you have to do!!!

What color are you getting???
Old 09-28-2006, 09:25 PM
  #10  
meaker
Three Wheelin'
 
meaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stan523
Does a supercharged engine suffer the same proportional power loss at altitude due to oxygen deprivation as a normally aspirated engine since the SC is chain/belt driven from the crank, or does SC compensate like a turbo?
Getting dumb and dumber as I get older..

I'm thinking of buying a Shelby GT500 to keep at our place in Colorado.
Top fuel Drag cars with tthere blowers still lose a little power at higher altitudes tracks. I think with a street car that is supercharger the lost would very little, if any.
Old 09-28-2006, 09:45 PM
  #11  
NNH
Burning Brakes
 
NNH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Anglo-Irish Mongrel in Delaware
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Boost is measured relative to local atmospheric pressure. So if your turbo wastegate is set to 5 pounds, then the at sea level engine sees 15psi of atmospheric PLUS 5psi of boost - all things being equal, that would turn a 300hp naturally aspirated engine into a 400hp engine. (I'm ignoring a lot of additional engineering factors here, but bear with me).

At altitude, local atmospheric pressure drops. For instance, at 6000 feet, atmospheric pressure is about 80% of sea level, or ~12 psi (see eXtreme calculator) , so the same turbo wastegate will add 5psi to give you 17psi at the engine intake - a 3psi loss or 15%, dropping our aforementioned turbo engine's output to 340hp. Still, you've got to feel for the non-turbo driver, who has seen a 20% drop in intake manifold pressure from 15psi to 12psi, and a 20% drop in power to 240hp.

So there you have it - turbo engines with conventional wastegates do suffer a little at altitude, but not as much as naturally aspirated cars. I suspect that true aviation engines have a different wastegate system that is designed to achieve a specified absolute pressure, instead of boost relative to local pressure.
Old 09-28-2006, 10:18 PM
  #12  
tkids
Pro
 
tkids's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CO. USA.
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Azurro_California_911
Wow according to Wallace Racing there is roughly a 13% loss in power, interesting. Thanks
Your lucky down there in Reno, up here in Truckee........................

Your BHP loss computed from your BHP of 355 at sea level and Elevation of 6200 feet is 66.03 HP loss
Old 09-28-2006, 10:46 PM
  #13  
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
 
Edgy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 17,699
Received 229 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

Perhaps that's why I never noticed the power drop in my turbo when doing mountain roads. It is very little. I thought that Porsche has an barometer in the design of the car so that it can adjust the mix and keep as much HP despite the thinning air.
Old 09-29-2006, 11:41 AM
  #14  
Paul523
Pro
 
Paul523's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for the explanation NNH, Meaker.



Quick Reply: High Altitude Power Loss



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:21 AM.