I had H&R springs installed this week
#1
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
I had H&R springs installed this week
I finally broke down and decided to go with H&R springs. While I had reservations about messing with the suspension geometry and wearing out the PASM dampers, I had heard enough positive feedback to take the plunge.
Honestly, the difference in ride and handling are almost negligible between stock. The car feels slightly more compliant over smooth surfaces but doesn't suffer from any of the dreaded bump steer often associated with lowering springs.
Overall, you can tell H&R spent time to ensure these springs wouldn't mess with the delicate balance of the stock car, which as most of you know is already extremely well sorted. If you are considering them, understand that the most noticeable improvement will be cosmetic.
Honestly, the difference in ride and handling are almost negligible between stock. The car feels slightly more compliant over smooth surfaces but doesn't suffer from any of the dreaded bump steer often associated with lowering springs.
Overall, you can tell H&R spent time to ensure these springs wouldn't mess with the delicate balance of the stock car, which as most of you know is already extremely well sorted. If you are considering them, understand that the most noticeable improvement will be cosmetic.
#3
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by CButler
May I ask how much it cost to install them?
#6
Very nice... great color and right height.
Rob
Rob
Trending Topics
#8
Newbies Hospitality Director
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 18,084
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes
on
32 Posts
Originally Posted by billco
What will spacers do?
#10
Banned
Looks nice Ian.
One thing that I've noticed with cars lowered by the H&R springs is that the kit seems to lower the front end more than the back end. At least it always looks like the front end sits much lower after the fact. Don't know if the back end sits higher than the front end from the factory and the springs just lower the car by equal amounts, giving the appearance that the front end sits lower after the fact.
I wonder if it's possible to lower just the rear with the H&R's while keeping the front end stock height, without having adverse effects on handling. Too bad the H&R engineers didn't design the kit so that it lowers the rear more than the front to give the car the appearance of a level ride height.
One thing that I've noticed with cars lowered by the H&R springs is that the kit seems to lower the front end more than the back end. At least it always looks like the front end sits much lower after the fact. Don't know if the back end sits higher than the front end from the factory and the springs just lower the car by equal amounts, giving the appearance that the front end sits lower after the fact.
I wonder if it's possible to lower just the rear with the H&R's while keeping the front end stock height, without having adverse effects on handling. Too bad the H&R engineers didn't design the kit so that it lowers the rear more than the front to give the car the appearance of a level ride height.
#11
Originally Posted by OCBen
Looks nice Ian.
One thing that I've noticed with cars lowered by the H&R springs is that the kit seems to lower the front end more than the back end. At least it always looks like the front end sits much lower after the fact. Don't know if the back end sits higher than the front end from the factory and the springs just lower the car by equal amounts, giving the appearance that the front end sits lower after the fact.
I wonder if it's possible to lower just the rear with the H&R's while keeping the front end stock height, without having adverse effects on handling. Too bad the H&R engineers didn't design the kit so that it lowers the rear more than the front to give the car the appearance of a level ride height.
One thing that I've noticed with cars lowered by the H&R springs is that the kit seems to lower the front end more than the back end. At least it always looks like the front end sits much lower after the fact. Don't know if the back end sits higher than the front end from the factory and the springs just lower the car by equal amounts, giving the appearance that the front end sits lower after the fact.
I wonder if it's possible to lower just the rear with the H&R's while keeping the front end stock height, without having adverse effects on handling. Too bad the H&R engineers didn't design the kit so that it lowers the rear more than the front to give the car the appearance of a level ride height.
#12
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by drbf
Looks great, how is the handling at moderate to higher speeds?
Originally Posted by OCBen
Looks nice Ian.
One thing that I've noticed with cars lowered by the H&R springs is that the kit seems to lower the front end more than the back end. At least it always looks like the front end sits much lower after the fact. Don't know if the back end sits higher than the front end from the factory and the springs just lower the car by equal amounts, giving the appearance that the front end sits lower after the fact.
I wonder if it's possible to lower just the rear with the H&R's while keeping the front end stock height, without having adverse effects on handling. Too bad the H&R engineers didn't design the kit so that it lowers the rear more than the front to give the car the appearance of a level ride height.
One thing that I've noticed with cars lowered by the H&R springs is that the kit seems to lower the front end more than the back end. At least it always looks like the front end sits much lower after the fact. Don't know if the back end sits higher than the front end from the factory and the springs just lower the car by equal amounts, giving the appearance that the front end sits lower after the fact.
I wonder if it's possible to lower just the rear with the H&R's while keeping the front end stock height, without having adverse effects on handling. Too bad the H&R engineers didn't design the kit so that it lowers the rear more than the front to give the car the appearance of a level ride height.
#13
Instructor
suspension pics
i too did the H&R swap the first week i owned the car, but my impression is a little different. the car was really comfortable as stock, but after the swap it became fairly rough, much like the sport button was on all the time. does not bother me but could bother others. here are my before and after pics. and yes the front is a little lower, but the is the way all cars are designed from the factory, even pickup trucks. too me the springs are a must b/c the car looks like it is a lifted 4x4 without them. i had my springs ordered before i even took delivery of the car.
#14
Three Wheelin'
Looking at your before pic. you can see that the front end is already sitting a little lower then the rear.Though, I wouldn't want anymore rake then the stock on a aftermarket spring. I also do think spring are a must b/c of the 4x4 look..Oh by the way your car looks great.
#15
Banned
merbesfield, thanks for that before and after pic of the rear end. Most of us here agree that the stock "SUV" ride height of the back end is not a very flattering look. Your after pic highlights the stance that makes the rear look the best.
Yeah, I'd really like to know if it's possible to lower just the rear with no adverse effects on handling. If so, I'll probably do so just for the improved look.
Yeah, I'd really like to know if it's possible to lower just the rear with no adverse effects on handling. If so, I'll probably do so just for the improved look.