OIL ANALYSIS
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
OIL ANALYSIS
I have taken oil samples throughout the life of my stock-engined 2007 RS - currently with 40k miles. I have always used Mobil1 or Castrol Syntec, changed at 3000 miles. Sending these samples to Blackstone, I have been comforted by their summary at the top of the page stating everything looked really fine. I have numbers in the 0-2 range (ppm) for lead and tin, aluminum 5, and iron 10, but my copper is measuring 18. A friend stated that his M3 with 100K miles only measures 5ppm for copper, and a friend of his had another M3 with 38ppm lead, and 38ppm copper. Upon the subsequent teardown, it was discovered that the rod bearings were severely worn. The elevated copper readings were explained as: Copper is a plain bearing plating that isn't exposed until the layers next to the crank journal (the lead and tin) are worn through. My question is whether 18ppm copper seems of concern to anyone who has regularly had oil samples analyzed? Are there other sources of copper wear that would show up in an oil analysis? Thank you in advance.
Last edited by HarmonyJim; 10-04-2021 at 01:22 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Robocop305 (10-03-2021)
#2
Rennlist Member
Have you seeing any flakes or shavings in the oil or filter? I have heard that the GT3 engines are known to shed more debris than others. I'm not sure how true that is.
Last edited by Robocop305; 10-04-2021 at 12:36 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Robocop305:
HarmonyJim (10-05-2021),
rrichmondd (10-25-2021)
#3
Rennlist Member
Has that reading been consistent over time or is it increasing?
The following 2 users liked this post by 8Lug:
HarmonyJim (10-05-2021),
Robocop305 (10-04-2021)
#4
Quit Smokin'
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I'm not sure if it eases your concerns, but M3 consume rod bearings as a known wear item. It's very common for M3s to have a rod bearing problem or lose the engine if they're neglected. To my knowledge there aren't known issues for rod bearings on any Mezger case / dry sump porsche engines. I've split cases that had a lot of copper showing on the oil pump / intermediate shaft plain bearings, but never heard of a Mezger engine failing from IMS problems (very different mechanical design than the water cooled cars that have big issues).
The following 2 users liked this post by Auto_Werks 3.6:
HarmonyJim (10-05-2021),
Robocop305 (01-18-2023)
#5
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I looked up my very first analysis, and it showed 14ppm for copper at approx 12,000 miles, and has measured as low as 8ppm at 15,200 miles. It has stayed within an 8ppm to 18ppm range since I first purchased the car at 9,000 miles in 2012.
#6
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I'm not sure if it eases your concerns, but M3 consume rod bearings as a known wear item. It's very common for M3s to have a rod bearing problem or lose the engine if they're neglected. To my knowledge there aren't known issues for rod bearings on any Mezger case / dry sump porsche engines. I've split cases that had a lot of copper showing on the oil pump / intermediate shaft plain bearings, but never heard of a Mezger engine failing from IMS problems (very different mechanical design than the water cooled cars that have big issues).
#7
My .2 has copper readings between 50 and 70 ppm. Runs like a top, burns zero oil, no visible metal ever in filter.
The following 2 users liked this post by GlenGT3:
HarmonyJim (10-05-2021),
Robocop305 (01-18-2023)
Trending Topics
#8
Quit Smokin'
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Yes, I have heard this is a known issue with M3s. My friend's mechanic is insisting he replace the rod bearings in his M3 even though the measurements he is seeing are far less than the numbers seen in my RS. Could be a case of his mechanic just wanting more work for himself.
The following users liked this post:
HarmonyJim (10-05-2021)
#9
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
The following users liked this post:
Robocop305 (01-18-2023)
#10
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Yesterday I went to the source and called Blackstone. According to the tech at Blackstone, the numbers are fine. He said there are many sources of copper other than the plain bearings (he mentioned bronze bushings as a potential source). He also mentioned that the lead levels would need to be very high if the rod/main bearings were wearing, and lead was measured at 0-2ppm, so that is definitely not an issue. He also agreed with Auto_Werks 3.6 that M3s are known as rod bearing destroyers. Considering GlenGT3 is measuring numbers much higher than mine, and he states the engine shows no signs of any internal distress, I guess I am just fine. Oh well, I guess I'll have to come up with another line of argument to convince myself (and my wife) to put a 3.9 SW in the back!!
Last edited by HarmonyJim; 10-05-2021 at 12:41 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by HarmonyJim:
Hella-Buggin' (10-18-2021),
Robocop305 (10-05-2021)
#11
Just to add as another data point, attached is the history of my 2010 since new. I'm waiting for another sample to come in from the most recent oil change.
Last edited by Clifton; 10-07-2021 at 07:37 PM.
The following 4 users liked this post by Clifton:
#12
Rennlist Member
This is very interesting to see the drop in readings as mileage is racked up. Please do post the most recent report when you get it back.
The following 3 users liked this post by Clifton:
#14
Great report! You're running M1 0W40? For 2k miles, glad to see it stayed within spec as I know many have reports where it shears down quickly. Also, it's great to see that a longer interval (2 years) does not really have any issue.
#15
Rennlist Member
Thank you for posting the update. Can you clarify the intervals? The most recent sample date is 9/2021 and the prior sample shows 11/2013, indicating an 8 year, 2311 mile interval. Were there more recent samples which are not shown on this report? Trying to reconcile the 672 mile interval shown on report and 2 year interval you mentioned.