Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

Crank pulley coming loose on GT3's.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2008, 11:04 PM
  #31  
On Pole
Racer
 
On Pole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Columbia, Md
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I only saw one hole on the end of my crankshaft. Does the end piece on the crankshaft come off? If so, what is that part number for an 04 GT3 RS?
Old 10-07-2013, 04:05 PM
  #32  
AngelOfGrief
8th Gear
 
AngelOfGrief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi, this happened to me yesterday on 996 turbo. I had a dead battery before, so I believe this must have triggered it (more load on the crank pulley). So the pulley came off while I was driving (luckily I was not going fast at that moment, but I was before).

With the help of my nephew we were able to fix this on the spot: the only thing that actually suffered was the center bolt: some of the grooves were damaged so we had to use a small file to fix them: otherwise the bolt would not go into the crankshaft all the way. You also have to remove the leftmost pulley to have access to the crankshaft. Not a very easy thing to do, but doable.

From this topic I learned that some people had to replace the crankshaft because of this failure -- ouch!!

I have found no trace of any locking pin, however. Is it supposed to be there? It's not mentioned in the parts catalog either. Does any one have any idea, please?

Bolt p/no is 99921712801.
Old 10-07-2013, 05:36 PM
  #33  
facelvega
Rennlist Member
 
facelvega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 936
Received 113 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Some discussion and links HERE.
Old 10-07-2013, 07:13 PM
  #34  
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Mvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 224 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

I have to replace my RMS this month before VIR, so will probably just replace this crank pulley bolt/washer and thread-lock it with 272. Also going to check my cam-actuator bolts while the motor is out, and re-torque if necessary.
Old 10-08-2013, 02:25 AM
  #35  
Jamie_GT3
Three Wheelin'
 
Jamie_GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,420
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Mvez,

Hold on a day or two, we're putting the final touches on the solution for all of this bolt loosening, cam adjuster, oil pump destroying shenanigans...

Will be updating this week...
Old 10-08-2013, 10:38 AM
  #36  
AudiOn19s
Race Car
 
AudiOn19s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 4,511
Received 46 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mvez
I have to replace my RMS this month before VIR, so will probably just replace this crank pulley bolt/washer and thread-lock it with 272. Also going to check my cam-actuator bolts while the motor is out, and re-torque if necessary.
just a very small dab of 272 on the crank bolt. That way you can still remove it with brute force if you have to do front main seal at any point. It's near impossible to get heat on the crank stub if that bolt ever has to come back out.
Old 10-08-2013, 08:01 PM
  #37  
RKAutowerks
Former Vendor
 
RKAutowerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The stock pulley only has about 0.16" engagement. At 125ft/lbs it shouldn't be coming out. Reason it's coming out is the stock damper isn't working.

Our solution has 0.500 in of engagement and the damper actually works!

Last edited by RKAutowerks; 10-08-2013 at 08:22 PM.
Old 10-08-2013, 08:09 PM
  #38  
m42racer
Three Wheelin'
 
m42racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Jamie,

I think you mis typed. I think you meant the Pulley has 0.16"engagement and the new damper has 0.500".
I'm sure you meant this.
Old 10-08-2013, 08:12 PM
  #39  
m42racer
Three Wheelin'
 
m42racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Just to make sure I'm correct, I read your other post. It said the pulley had 0.16" engagement and the new damper had 0.500".
Old 10-08-2013, 08:22 PM
  #40  
RKAutowerks
Former Vendor
 
RKAutowerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m42racer
Jamie,

I think you mis typed. I think you meant the Pulley has 0.16"engagement and the new damper has 0.500".
I'm sure you meant this.
fixed, thanks
Old 10-08-2013, 09:07 PM
  #41  
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Mvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 224 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RKAutowerks
The stock pulley only has about 0.16" engagement. At 125ft/lbs it shouldn't be coming out. Reason it's coming out is the stock damper isn't working.

Our solution has 0.500 in of engagement and the damper actually works!
uh, post more please. PM sent. I dealt with all this same crap with my E46 M3 back when SMF were being used, and the stock harmonic balancers were getting nuked by a massive resonance in the 4-5k range upon deceleration, until VAC started selling a custom built ATI unit for the S54.

It's always weirded me out that the GT3 RS has no harmonic damper and uses a single mass flywheel.

I do have a question though, would using polyurethane tranny mounst have any measurable effect on the resonance (increase)?

Last edited by Mvez; 10-08-2013 at 09:28 PM.
Old 10-08-2013, 09:45 PM
  #42  
RKAutowerks
Former Vendor
 
RKAutowerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mvez
uh, post more please. PM sent. I dealt with all this same crap with my E46 M3 back when SMF were being used, and the stock harmonic balancers were getting nuked by a massive resonance in the 4-5k range upon deceleration, until VAC started selling a custom built ATI unit for the S54.

It's always weirded me out that the GT3 RS has no harmonic damper and uses a single mass flywheel.

I do have a question though, would using polyurethane tranny mounst have any measurable effect on the resonance (increase)?
Replied to your PM, and I agree. When I first learned of the cam bolt issues, the flywheel bolt issues, crank pulley bolt issues, all of these instantly made me thing harmonics... We're lucky in that with the S54 the cranks were snapping!

Take a look through this if you haven't.
https://rennlist.com/forums/10816248-post1.html

if you want more in depth, I've got a reference paper that is very helpful on understanding engine harmonics and harmonic dampers...

Let me know and I'll post it in a different post (it to is super long...)
Old 10-11-2013, 07:16 AM
  #43  
Ur20v
Three Wheelin'
 
Ur20v's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Engine and gear box mounts make no difference to the harmonics and what damage they cause (just) to the engine and gear box. LWFW make the gearbox vulnerable along with increased chance of engine issues.

I am guessing the inlet manifold issues on 4.0's are for the same reasons...
Old 10-11-2013, 01:15 PM
  #44  
m42racer
Three Wheelin'
 
m42racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

On another post someone has had their Exhaust come apart. Same cause I'm told.

I was told this has happened alot on the Cup engines. The early exhausts in particular came apart.
This is the problem with this sort of failure. It's hard to undersatnd as there are no signs before failure happens. We all know Oil leaks, a noise that shouldn't happen, temperatures high etc.
Old 10-11-2013, 03:12 PM
  #45  
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Mvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 224 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ur20v
Engine and gear box mounts make no difference to the harmonics and what damage they cause (just) to the engine and gear box. LWFW make the gearbox vulnerable along with increased chance of engine issues.

I am guessing the inlet manifold issues on 4.0's are for the same reasons...
That's what I thought, after installing the 70A tranny bushings, I noticed a large resonance at about 4000RPM's, which goes away as revs climb....I thought it is engine resonance, not tranny whine/NVH, but I could be wrong. Even if the stock rubber tranny mounts mask the engine resonance, it doesn't actually absorb the actual crank resonance/harmonics at that RPM....just keeps the driver from feeling it. This of course is my theory to be tested once the pulley is installed.



Quick Reply: Crank pulley coming loose on GT3's.....



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:11 PM.