Notices
997 Turbo Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Success! FVD tune is stupid fast.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2014, 05:12 PM
  #16  
garychios
Pro
 
garychios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Who sold you this? I got a bridge to sell you. Cheap.
Old 09-02-2014, 06:50 PM
  #17  
Domer911
Rennlist Member
 
Domer911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 2,190
Received 355 Likes on 191 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by garychios
Who sold you this? I got a bridge to sell you. Cheap.
that's a little mean
Old 09-02-2014, 07:19 PM
  #18  
CincyScott
Rennlist Member
 
CincyScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,377
Received 82 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

The difference in tuners come from their experience with the platform. I used UMW for my 996tt after everyone raved about it. When you talk to Kevin about his tune, you realize that a) he knows a ton about these cars and b) he tests it all on his cars first. That experience with my 996 lead me to duplicating that in my 997.

My goals for a tune aren't absolute hp, it's drivability and smoothness. If I yield 10 hp peak to another tuner that's fine, because I have all the confidence in the world that my engine is safe and that it won't surprise me (unpleasantly) down the road.

So I don't agree that they are all the same.
Old 09-02-2014, 07:37 PM
  #19  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,440
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by garychios
Who sold you this? I got a bridge to sell you. Cheap.
No idea WTF this means and what I've supposed to have "bought" - is it an Americanism

Read the link I gave you in the first post and see how different "tunes" perform at highish loads then get back to me about your all tunes are the same ideas
Old 09-02-2014, 09:33 PM
  #20  
Igooz
Trucker
Rennlist Member
 
Igooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Permanently Banned
Posts: 4,011
Received 472 Likes on 266 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by garychios
Who sold you this? I got a bridge to sell you. Cheap.
Gary, are you suggesting that the "data files" that are flashed into the DME such as the various maps (throttle pedal angle vs fuel command, or 3D fuel and timing and boost or all the temperature/knock/ altitude/... compensation curves...) are the same amongst all tuners OR that the algorithms ("logic") between all the tuners is the same?
Old 09-03-2014, 07:32 AM
  #21  
garychios
Pro
 
garychios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yup.

And a tuner controls them. The ways its done is all the same. Unless one company has not deciphered or reversed engineered everything in the ecu and does not touch all ends of it. In the end, everything is already in the ECU and they are changing fuel, boost and timing curves. The resolution of the sensors, maps, ecu calculations per rev, knock calc etc and everything else stays the same.
Old 09-03-2014, 08:57 PM
  #22  
COBB Tuning
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
COBB Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 495
Received 185 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by garychios
Yup.

And a tuner controls them. The ways its done is all the same. Unless one company has not deciphered or reversed engineered everything in the ecu and does not touch all ends of it. In the end, everything is already in the ECU and they are changing fuel, boost and timing curves. The resolution of the sensors, maps, ecu calculations per rev, knock calc etc and everything else stays the same.
This is false. There are differences between tunes. We have compared just about every flash to ours. I can assure you that power differences will show that.

In the SDI3 (997.2 Turbo ECU) for example there are around 12,000 tables, variables, constants and various other things that determine how a car runs. Controlling and understanding how the sub systems work is a tedious task. Saying they are all the same is false as there is no way that every tuner can all make the same exact table changes to the same tables.

Even just understanding how these ECU's function is a daunting task.

The strategy of the stock ECU to a Motec is vastly different. It is not as simple as fuel, timing, boost etc. They are meant to control every changing temperature, elevation, fuel quality etc while still performing without a hiccup and also helping to communicate with every other module in the car.

Hope this helps Gary. I know it may seem like they are the same but they are vastly different.

-Mitch
__________________


PORSCHE EXPERT GROUP - TIM | GRANT | HJ | ANDREW | JARED
COBBTUNING.COM | LIKE US ON FACEBOOK | SEARCH KNOWLEDGE BASE |CONTACT US

Old 09-03-2014, 09:31 PM
  #23  
Igooz
Trucker
Rennlist Member
 
Igooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Permanently Banned
Posts: 4,011
Received 472 Likes on 266 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by garychios
Yup.

And a tuner controls them. The ways its done is all the same. Unless one company has not deciphered or reversed engineered everything in the ecu and does not touch all ends of it. In the end, everything is already in the ECU and they are changing fuel, boost and timing curves. The resolution of the sensors, maps, ecu calculations per rev, knock calc etc and everything else stays the same.
Gary, the resolution of the sensors will be the same, the resolution of the A/D convertors and the PWM signals will be the same for sure...same h/w for sure...

...but there is no way that the control algorithms, and all the calibration parameters (thresholds, 3-D maps, ...) between the various tuners are the same. Just IMHO and I know many of these guys.

PS: TB993tt knows his stuff as I have other pcars and on other forums. He has a GT2 that will (almost) outrun anything that I have!
Old 09-28-2014, 10:54 AM
  #24  
McCrazy
Instructor
 
McCrazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 207
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you don't change any hardware it is true that the system as a whole will have the same ultimate capability. The difference (as has been pointed out multiple times now) is the programmers and what parameters they change in the software. Some can make more power and keep the engine reliable. Some make more power but less reliable. Perhaps same power and less reliable if the programmer sucks. Anything is possible.

If you choose not to believe the software skill makes a difference Gary, check out the diesel forums. Diesel tuners are a huge deal and they all have different results and reputations. The simple fact that almost all of them have multiple tunes in the same programmer so the driver can adjust his tune as he desires proves that programming makes a difference in ultimate performance, despite the hardware remaining the same.

Take a look and be enlightened: http://www.powerstroke.org/forum/6-7...an-review.html



Quick Reply: Success! FVD tune is stupid fast.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:34 AM.