Any reason to avoid 2011 TT?
#46
#47
This 9A1 vs Mezger debate is entertaining if nothing else. Fact: stock 9A1 DFI dfi combustion technology produces more power and is more efficient than efi. With DFI the combustion temps are lower so in turbocharged applications you can do more with boost than an efi mezger which needs to offset the higher combustion temps from adding boost. The 9A1 DFI produces more power per cc, is more efficient as a performance engine, and is simply more technologically advanced as an engine on a number of fronts, a clear step forward on all counts. i.e :9A1 has 40% less components than Mezger making for less complications/problems, weighs less, the new design allowing a lower center of gravity in chassis. All clear positive steps forward.
The age old argument the Mezger is tried proven and tested and the 9A1 isn't, is getting old along with the 997.1 platform in general.
9A1 has no history of premature failures least of all suffering from the same problems mezger suffers (i.e IMS shaft failures etc) note: 9A1 has been in the market in large numbers for some years now...purring away reliably, fuss free with better performance and all round efficiency.
Sure, race teams will always work with what they are accustomed to and, what they can get parts readily for at a cheaper price (usually for when it pops from over-tuning it without replacing the "rods" and other hard parts lol).
If there are any comparative weaknesses between both engines it is purely in the rods of 9A1 which are marginally lighter. Like big deal! How many tune the engine to a level which will bend rods anyway?...and those that do usually regret it at one point and/or sell the car off for reasons previously mentioned i.e it becomes a pig to drive beyond short blasts, becomes garage queen accordingly.
The whole Mezger is "detuned" story and 9A1 is "tuned out to the max stock" story is pure unadulterated fantasy, evidently based on die hard emotion with zero supportive facts beyond the weaker rods story (which is a thin argument at best).
Die hard's raving on about Mezger's racing history/pedigree as if they are driving around with a full blown Lemans race engine under their hood is laughable, as fact is a proper Mezger race engine has so many different up-rated internal hard and core parts than the street Mezger engine (save the basic bare block) it may as well be called a different engine model, yet certain owners of the street Mezger claim the same status as the race variant LMAO! You guys crack me up. Seriously. Who are you trying to fool? I mean just look at the differences in the pistons, rods, oil pump, crankshaft, valves, springs, camshafts etc..so why bother embarrassing yourselves by even comparing the two variants! Oh, but the block is the same lol so yup it's the same engine lol
I think the best cure for some guys is to actually get the keys to a new 9A1 car and take it out for a day, then get back into .1 mezger and deal with the fact the new car is simply better performing everywhere and not just down to the pdk box. Times have moved on boys and to much greener pastures....
PS. Forgot to add a DFI engine in general is far more costly to manufacture than a conventional EFI due to the requirement of more robust components, which kind of blows the argument that the engine is weaker and Porsche changed to the DFI to save money on production lol.
The age old argument the Mezger is tried proven and tested and the 9A1 isn't, is getting old along with the 997.1 platform in general.
9A1 has no history of premature failures least of all suffering from the same problems mezger suffers (i.e IMS shaft failures etc) note: 9A1 has been in the market in large numbers for some years now...purring away reliably, fuss free with better performance and all round efficiency.
Sure, race teams will always work with what they are accustomed to and, what they can get parts readily for at a cheaper price (usually for when it pops from over-tuning it without replacing the "rods" and other hard parts lol).
If there are any comparative weaknesses between both engines it is purely in the rods of 9A1 which are marginally lighter. Like big deal! How many tune the engine to a level which will bend rods anyway?...and those that do usually regret it at one point and/or sell the car off for reasons previously mentioned i.e it becomes a pig to drive beyond short blasts, becomes garage queen accordingly.
The whole Mezger is "detuned" story and 9A1 is "tuned out to the max stock" story is pure unadulterated fantasy, evidently based on die hard emotion with zero supportive facts beyond the weaker rods story (which is a thin argument at best).
Die hard's raving on about Mezger's racing history/pedigree as if they are driving around with a full blown Lemans race engine under their hood is laughable, as fact is a proper Mezger race engine has so many different up-rated internal hard and core parts than the street Mezger engine (save the basic bare block) it may as well be called a different engine model, yet certain owners of the street Mezger claim the same status as the race variant LMAO! You guys crack me up. Seriously. Who are you trying to fool? I mean just look at the differences in the pistons, rods, oil pump, crankshaft, valves, springs, camshafts etc..so why bother embarrassing yourselves by even comparing the two variants! Oh, but the block is the same lol so yup it's the same engine lol
I think the best cure for some guys is to actually get the keys to a new 9A1 car and take it out for a day, then get back into .1 mezger and deal with the fact the new car is simply better performing everywhere and not just down to the pdk box. Times have moved on boys and to much greener pastures....
PS. Forgot to add a DFI engine in general is far more costly to manufacture than a conventional EFI due to the requirement of more robust components, which kind of blows the argument that the engine is weaker and Porsche changed to the DFI to save money on production lol.
Nostalgia is the only valid argument for a stock/bolt ons street car.
#48
Burning Brakes
But here are the facts:
996TT to 997TT: 15%+ HP increase over 7 years. Both with same 3.6L displacement
997TT to 991TT: 8% HP increase over 8 yrs. and the DFI is 3.8L vs the mezger at 3.6L. The additional displacement alone accounts for the majority of the HP increase.
With more boost and larger displacement why is the 9A1 TT only making 8% more HP if it is such a technological advancement? Am I really the only one disappointed with this? IMO the majority of the performance gains in the 991 TT are coming from the PDK, 4 wheel steering, and improvements to the chassis, but the power gains from the engine are not impressive by any measure.
All IMHO of course
#49
Lmao guys. You are clutching at straws. Even Tom from CMS said in that link the .2 is soooo much better! A tune and a bit of fuel and voila 9 second! As I've said a few times here already. Grab the keys for a day and put one of the 9A1 engine'd cars through its paces and then tell me all about it ok. Porsche is about accel times and lap times both of which exceed the Mezger where the new car/engine is concerned. Forget the hp increases not being to "expectation". Its all meaningless when the the new car is eating the old car for breakfast. The new DFI engine is capable of much more yet doesn't need to do any more to spank mezger and blind freddy can see that. That's all that matters. While you guys are tripping on the nostalgia of an engine which in essence is vastly different in terms of internal parts than what your street engines have, the new street car has left you in its dust.
Read and weep: http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/9...ck-turbos.html
Game over.
Read and weep: http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/9...ck-turbos.html
Game over.
#50
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Absolute Limit of Traction
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Lmao guys. You are clutching at straws. Even Tom from CMS said in that link the .2 is soooo much better! A tune and a bit of fuel and voila 9 second! As I've said a few times here already. Grab the keys for a day and put one of the 9A1 engine'd cars through its paces and then tell me all about it ok. Porsche is about accel times and lap times both of which exceed the Mezger where the new car/engine is concerned. Forget the hp increases not being to "expectation". Its all meaningless when the the new car is eating the old car for breakfast. The new DFI engine is capable of much more yet doesn't need to do any more to spank mezger and blind freddy can see that. That's all that matters. While you guys are tripping on the nostalgia of an engine which in essence is vastly different in terms of internal parts than what your street engines have, the new street car has left you in its dust.
Read and weep: http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/9...ck-turbos.html
Game over.
Read and weep: http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/9...ck-turbos.html
Game over.
Sitting must be difficult for you.
#51
You're stretching your evidence. It relates to times set at a drag strip with a modified DFI engine; no insight is offered about the modified DFI engine's purported advantages on a road course. Moreover, you legislate out of consideration or trivialize any evidence which runs counter to your views.
Sitting must be difficult for you.
Sitting must be difficult for you.
And your "sitting is difficult for you" comment is obviously based on your own personal experience. You really shouldn't assume the next persons position and direct insults just because the argument is not going to your particular favor.
#52
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Absolute Limit of Traction
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Your emotions are getting the best of you, speed21, and you're losing track of reason. When details become inconvenient, you simply overlook them. The Champion car was modified, and Tom described the nature of the modifications: "new CMS/GIAC software, Tubi Race exhaust, Werks1 Y-Pipe & Airbox, Champion Intercoolers, IPD plenum, and a pair of drag radials on the rear wheels." Clearly, for you engine modifications must necessarily entail "internal modifications or changes to turbos." In other words, only internal modifications, altered turbos, or both constitute "engine modifications." While on some occasions you distort evidence to fit your position, in this instance you're restricting evidence.
I have no horse in this race, speed21. I am however, intrigued by the types of rationale and rhetorical strategies which some are employing.
You once used the abbreviation "LMAO." If you've been "laughing your *** off" to some of the responses to your posts, then you must have difficulty sitting. Your accusation concerning "direct insults" completely misses the mark.
I have no horse in this race, speed21. I am however, intrigued by the types of rationale and rhetorical strategies which some are employing.
You once used the abbreviation "LMAO." If you've been "laughing your *** off" to some of the responses to your posts, then you must have difficulty sitting. Your accusation concerning "direct insults" completely misses the mark.
#53
Your emotions are getting the best of you, speed21, and you're losing track of reason. When details become inconvenient, you simply overlook them.
You once used the abbreviation "LMAO." If you've been "laughing your *** off" to some of the responses to your posts, then you must have difficulty sitting. Your accusation concerning "direct insults" completely misses the mark.
You once used the abbreviation "LMAO." If you've been "laughing your *** off" to some of the responses to your posts, then you must have difficulty sitting. Your accusation concerning "direct insults" completely misses the mark.
#54
I think speed is fine. Talking to major tuning shops like AMS, Shop CT shows how you guys are acting stupid with your .1 cars.
Everyone working on these cars will tell you the .2 is better from Tym S, To AMS, To Vivid and more. Do you guys even work on your cars? Or they just trophies with clean DME reports. lol
Everyone working on these cars will tell you the .2 is better from Tym S, To AMS, To Vivid and more. Do you guys even work on your cars? Or they just trophies with clean DME reports. lol
#55
^ Cheers Gary. Since linking the CMS 9 sec .2 I've seemingly acquired two emotionally charged sheilas, one who interestingly wants to tell everyone about blocking me yet still can't refrain from reading my posts, now posting only to pop the boot in on me trying to seek the high moral ground, and looking for any support available lol! Pathetic really. Must be that time of the month I guess.
.1tt is still a great car but it's Game over against either of these two newer models...all over bar the shouting it would seem.
PS. Hey OP where did you get up to?
.1tt is still a great car but it's Game over against either of these two newer models...all over bar the shouting it would seem.
PS. Hey OP where did you get up to?
#56
Burning Brakes
I think speed is fine. Talking to major tuning shops like AMS, Shop CT shows how you guys are acting stupid with your .1 cars. Everyone working on these cars will tell you the .2 is better from Tym S, To AMS, To Vivid and more. Do you guys even work on your cars? Or they just trophies with clean DME reports. lol
As far as this thread OP go for the .2 !
Does anyone know where I put in fuel? I can't find a gas cap in the back of the car!
#57
Agree Tom Vivid wasn't the best choice to draw upon where cred is concerned but I get the gist of what Gary is saying re .2 and .1. Hey btw I see VR is on track in destroying the 991tt now....a work in progress.
What's this about the gas cap? Ya lost me..
What's this about the gas cap? Ya lost me..
#58
Rennlist Member
You guys have gone off track. Key takeaway: no reason to avoid a 2011 TT. Get the newest car you can afford and enjoy the f$&@ out of it. Either an early or late 997 TT is going to be hellishly fun to drive.
#59
The primary reason the 997.2 runs 9's at the dragstrip with a tune, intercoolers and fuel is the PDK. It has nothing to do with anything else. The transmission is so far superior on the track than the 6speed or even Tip that it isnt even a contest.
I wonder if you could mate a PDK transmission to a 997.1 engine.....
I wonder if you could mate a PDK transmission to a 997.1 engine.....
#60
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Absolute Limit of Traction
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
I've seemingly acquired two emotionally charged sheilas, one who interestingly wants to tell everyone about blocking me yet still can't refrain from reading my posts, now posting only to pop the boot in on me trying to seek the high moral ground, and looking for any support available lol! Pathetic really. Must be that time of the month I guess.