Notices
997 Turbo Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

997.1 vs. 997.2 - Now after a few years?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2017, 02:40 AM
  #16  
CodeRed
Rennlist Member
 
CodeRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa monica
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Southpaw
Integrated dry sump... dry sump..wet sump.. What's it matter when there are very few engine failures at the track? Regardless of which dry sump technology, the end game is reliable track performance, right?

And how many drivers actually drive these cars to that limit where one technology is a much have?
I would always choose a true dry over "integrated" sump...just a cost cutting measure for .2 DF
Old 06-24-2017, 07:41 PM
  #17  
Southpaw
Racer
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: The North Coast
Posts: 289
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CodeRed
I would always choose a true dry over "integrated" sump...just a cost cutting measure for .2 DF
Effectiveness seems to be the same. Neither are experiencing oil starvation issues during hard cornering. The harder cornering 997.2 gets by just fine.
So if you'd rather have it just to say you have it (and never need it) then I suppose that's a reason to want it. We don't know if it's truly cost cutting and only Porsche knows this, not anybody here. Developing a new engine is very expensive for them and if the Mezger is the be all, end all, why didn't they just keep it in the newer, much more expensive RS models and hike up the price further to offset it? Maybe it's for simplicity reasons..

We all say we like cars that are more simple and raw, yet when the DFI is more simple with less moving, complex parts, we bash it.....
Old 06-25-2017, 01:55 AM
  #18  
CodeRed
Rennlist Member
 
CodeRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa monica
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

still a wet sump...my opinion remains unchanged
Old 06-25-2017, 05:21 AM
  #19  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,895
Received 81 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Southpaw
Effectiveness seems to be the same. Neither are experiencing oil starvation issues during hard cornering. The harder cornering 997.2 gets by just fine.
So if you'd rather have it just to say you have it (and never need it) then I suppose that's a reason to want it. We don't know if it's truly cost cutting and only Porsche knows this, not anybody here. Developing a new engine is very expensive for them and if the Mezger is the be all, end all, why didn't they just keep it in the newer, much more expensive RS models and hike up the price further to offset it? Maybe it's for simplicity reasons..

We all say we like cars that are more simple and raw, yet when the DFI is more simple with less moving, complex parts, we bash it.....
Mezger definitely more costly to produce. Porsche even admitted while introducing the new 991 GT3 engine, said economically we couldn't build Mezger engines anymore at scale and sell it for the same price. There's a lot more parts in common between Carrera, Turbo and GT3 models now. All leads to lower costs across the board. Mezger was a completely different engine than Carrera engines.
Old 06-25-2017, 11:32 AM
  #20  
Southpaw
Racer
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: The North Coast
Posts: 289
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
Mezger definitely more costly to produce. Porsche even admitted while introducing the new 991 GT3 engine, said economically we couldn't build Mezger engines anymore at scale and sell it for the same price. There's a lot more parts in common between Carrera, Turbo and GT3 models now. All leads to lower costs across the board. Mezger was a completely different engine than Carrera engines.
Oh I never claimed to know for sure which was more expensive. But if this is the case, then lower costs, reliable, more efficient, faster... Win/win/win/win for Porsche.

I get it though, there's always the camp in favor of romanticism and nostalgia above this. To me, I can't buy something just for a name and just because it's more expensive to produce. Give me the more kickass car.

Again, I've had both... Both are fantastic cars and we each have our own reasoning. I went with the more rare and faster car above nostalgia and a name. Reading an article about the strength of the DFI internals sealed the deal for me.
Old 06-25-2017, 01:31 PM
  #21  
Catorce
Banned
 
Catorce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,609
Received 73 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

It has nothing to do with cost when you look at Mezger vs DFI. In fact, I am the only one on the planet who is currently producing the Mezger engine case casting; not even Porsche is making it anymore. As to cost, the Mezger case is far more simple and I can sell one for 5K. No way you are selling a DFI case for that little...it will cost way more.

The real reason the Mezger has fallen out of favor is fuel economy, plain and simple. Politicians set fuel economy standards which are impossible to achieve using existant technology, and car manufacturers scramble to make it happen.

The DFI motor is more fuel efficient, period, end. Similarly, the change from NA to turbo across all model lines is motivated by fuel economy.

If the Mezger motor was an inferior engine from a performance standpoint, it wouldn't have been around since 1965....clearly it is the superior engine. However, it reached the end of its useful life when fuel economy was thrown into the mix.

Pretty simple actually.
Old 06-25-2017, 02:45 PM
  #22  
skyak
Rennlist Member
 
skyak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 277
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

What was the last Porsche production car with a Mezger?
Old 06-25-2017, 06:25 PM
  #23  
Catorce
Banned
 
Catorce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,609
Received 73 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

^ pretty sure it was the 2009 model year across the board, then after that the 997 GT3s had them until the 991 was introduced. Therefore the last production mezger car would have been the 2013 997GT3
Old 06-26-2017, 04:25 AM
  #24  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,895
Received 81 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Southpaw
Oh I never claimed to know for sure which was more expensive. But if this is the case, then lower costs, reliable, more efficient, faster... Win/win/win/win for Porsche.

I get it though, there's always the camp in favor of romanticism and nostalgia above this. To me, I can't buy something just for a name and just because it's more expensive to produce. Give me the more kickass car.

Again, I've had both... Both are fantastic cars and we each have our own reasoning. I went with the more rare and faster car above nostalgia and a name. Reading an article about the strength of the DFI internals sealed the deal for me.
I don't think it's the name or nostalgia, Mezger was the basis for all Cup cars (obviously without turbo) and you could swap cup parts plug and play. So there's a basis for the nostalgia. Now the previous post about fuel Econ is spot on. That's the main reason for all the changes. My question was mostly around how DFI has fared and it looks like it's been OK but with some engine blow up issues (one post above).
Old 06-26-2017, 10:57 AM
  #25  
CodeRed
Rennlist Member
 
CodeRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa monica
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

How many of us bought a turbo for fuel economy reasons? Over regulation caused the demise of the Mezger...it will be electric self driving cars next.
Old 06-26-2017, 01:01 PM
  #26  
white997
Advanced
 
white997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Mezger is the most famous/race proven Porsche engine of all time. The DFI costs porsche half (as i was told by a porsche engineer) to produce.
Old 06-26-2017, 01:21 PM
  #27  
Catorce
Banned
 
Catorce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,609
Received 73 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by white997
Mezger is the most famous/race proven Porsche engine of all time. The DFI costs porsche half (as i was told by a porsche engineer) to produce.

Not a correct comparison. An individual DFI motor is FAR more expensive than an individual Mezger motor.

HOWEVER - Porsche invested heavily in DFI technology across its model line, and now it shares a common platform across all 911s, therefore making it cheaper en masse than Mezger, but only because it uses this engine in all its cars.
Old 06-26-2017, 11:31 PM
  #28  
Southpaw
Racer
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: The North Coast
Posts: 289
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
My question was mostly around how DFI has fared and it looks like it's been OK but with some engine blow up issues (one post above).
Haven't heard of any blowing up...not saying it's never happened because ALL engines blow up when the perfect storm occurs. But it's not a common issue.. actually haven't seen or heard of any common issues and I know a lot of modded ones around the world. It's actually still very early in it's infancy in terms of aftermarket and new things are coming out each month..faster and faster ones are being built. We've seen threads here with some very fast ones with the most basic modifications...and reliably. There are some common issues with the Mezger and I'm not saying there won't be any common issues with the 9A1 but as of now, I haven't seen any reoccurring posts about common issues.

I'm just providing some info I learned since there seems to be so much misinformation (some from people who can't even spell Mezger). Just searching a few years back and you'll see some misinformation being repeated and drilled into noobs. When it first came out, people here were saying it'll blow up with a tune, that was proven untrue...then people were saying the internals are weaker, then that was also proven untrue ( https://www.cobbtuning.com/porsche-9...g-rod-testing/ ) ..so now, people hang on to race heritage...but now the 9A1 is beginning it's own racing heritage. It doesn't have the time behind it as the Mezger does yet.

I'm not against the Mezger..I know my posts may sound like it. I had a 997.1 turbo and it was a fantastic car. I simply wanted something faster without extensive modifications and wanted it done reliably with the least amount of mods. I actually want to add another Mezger sooner than later but in a more pure form.... 997 GT3.
Old 06-27-2017, 10:07 AM
  #29  
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 15,630
Received 1,373 Likes on 794 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Catorce
Not a correct comparison. An individual DFI motor is FAR more expensive than an individual Mezger motor.

HOWEVER - Porsche invested heavily in DFI technology across its model line, and now it shares a common platform across all 911s, therefore making it cheaper en masse than Mezger, but only because it uses this engine in all its cars.
Do you have evidence of this?

My understanding was that the parts cost on the DFI may be about the same, but the man hours to assemble the mezger was so much longer given all the individual parts (I'm convinced the whole thing is just a mess of bolts) that the labor cost was what cost porsche too much.
Old 06-27-2017, 11:10 AM
  #30  
squid42
Burning Brakes
 
squid42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,158
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Porsche managed to do the switch to direct injection without having major issues like carbon buildup pop up. They were doing a lot better than pretty much everybody else, including other VAG brands.


Quick Reply: 997.1 vs. 997.2 - Now after a few years?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:17 PM.