Porsche ship on fire in Atlantic
#16
Burning Brakes
#19
#20
Advanced
#21
Racer
According to news this morning, the ship is being towed to the Bahamas.
The following users liked this post:
Nickshu (02-22-2022)
#22
Rennlist Member
Well, it's been shown that many fewer EVs catch fire than ICEVs, even if you go by a weighted ("per 1000") basis.
Gasoline is inherently more of a fire risk than are lithium batteries, which have lots of safeguards built in, and if/when solid-state batteries
come into the picture for EVs, no such vehicles will catch fire.
But, yes, it will be interesting to see where/how the fire started on this ship, in which cars are packed closely next to each other, whereby one catching fire will spread quickly to the next...
If Porsche had 1200 vehicles on that ship, one can suppose that roughly 300-400 of them (at least) were Macans...
Gasoline is inherently more of a fire risk than are lithium batteries, which have lots of safeguards built in, and if/when solid-state batteries
come into the picture for EVs, no such vehicles will catch fire.
But, yes, it will be interesting to see where/how the fire started on this ship, in which cars are packed closely next to each other, whereby one catching fire will spread quickly to the next...
If Porsche had 1200 vehicles on that ship, one can suppose that roughly 300-400 of them (at least) were Macans...
As far as the risk of lithium vs. gasoline, at a minimum, gasoline cars require a collision or if there is a gasoline leak, you have some form of warning. The chance of a lithium battery vehicle catching fire in my garage without any warning is of serious concern to me. If I smell gasoline fumes, in most cases that can be corrected prior to being a true hazard. You have no warning with a lithium battery. It is the lack of predictability that is of main concern.
The following users liked this post:
wls1425 (02-22-2022)
#24
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a3...rgo-ship-sunk/
Time to go fishing
Time to go fishing