Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New PCA MidEngine class

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2023, 10:46 AM
  #1  
PGas32
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
PGas32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 862
Received 190 Likes on 104 Posts
Default New PCA MidEngine class

I'm surprised this hasn't been discussed already. What are the thoughts on the new ME1 class for 2.7L base Boxsters and Caymans? Proposed rule set here.
Old 02-06-2023, 07:41 PM
  #2  
sbelles
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
 
sbelles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Here some and there some
Posts: 12,092
Received 248 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

The letter classes are pretty much gone and there are a lot of cars out there that fit the bill. Why not?
Old 02-06-2023, 08:39 PM
  #3  
chartersb
Racer
 
chartersb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Western New York
Posts: 302
Received 62 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Instead another class, PCA already has more classes than a small college, why not start combing classes.
The following 4 users liked this post by chartersb:
erliuic (11-05-2023), LuigiVampa (02-06-2023), mikew968 (02-07-2023), RennPart (02-08-2023)
Old 02-06-2023, 08:47 PM
  #4  
winders
Race Car
 
winders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Martin, CA
Posts: 4,484
Received 776 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

The goal should be to roll Spec Boxster into this class.....
Old 02-06-2023, 10:03 PM
  #5  
LuigiVampa
WRONGLY ACCUSED!
Rennlist Member
 
LuigiVampa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Connecticut Valley Region
Posts: 14,512
Received 3,370 Likes on 1,618 Posts
Default

SPC took cars from G, H and I. Won't the ME class steal cars from SPC?
Old 02-06-2023, 10:35 PM
  #6  
PGas32
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
PGas32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 862
Received 190 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

It’s only 2.7L cars, so no it won’t take any current cars from SPC. There’s hardly any 2.7’s currently racing (maybe E class?), so my guess is the target is new builds with 986 and 987 base Boxsters and Caymans.
Old 02-06-2023, 11:03 PM
  #7  
dan212
Rennlist Member
 
dan212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,611
Received 106 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Merging 2.5 and 2.7 cars brought howls of disapproval (mine as well).
It is at least a sensible class, but what happens to SPB?. A spec class is best IMHO.. Don't know if there is room for both..
I am glad I am not in charge here

/dan

Originally Posted by winders
The goal should be to roll Spec Boxster into this class.....

Last edited by dan212; 02-06-2023 at 11:10 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Veloce Raptor (02-07-2023)
Old 02-06-2023, 11:04 PM
  #8  
BFT3.2
Rennlist Member
 
BFT3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 10 mins from Lime Rock
Posts: 389
Received 111 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Another "affordable" racing class probably isnt a bad thing? Looking at the rules it seems on paper they wouldn't be much more to build/field than a SPB aside from the cost of the donor car. There's a ton of the approved cars available on the open market and very few are being raced already.
Old 02-06-2023, 11:14 PM
  #9  
dan212
Rennlist Member
 
dan212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,611
Received 106 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

I agree 100%. But when SPB was conceived it was intended to be affordable. Engines and gearboxes were disposable. Nobody bothered ti fix them, When I asked about transmission cooling I was laughed at.
Now none of those disposable parts are so disposable.
In the end, they will wind up merging SPB with the new class. And nobody will be happy.
But its inevitable

Originally Posted by BFT3.2
Another "affordable" racing class probably isnt a bad thing? Looking at the rules it seems on paper they wouldn't be much more to build/field than a SPB aside from the cost of the donor car. There's a ton of the approved cars available on the open market and very few are being raced already.
The following users liked this post:
BFT3.2 (02-06-2023)
Old 02-07-2023, 08:05 AM
  #10  
jgiannone
Advanced
 
jgiannone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

For whatever reasons, car counts are down from ten or fifteen years ago. When I stand back and look at PCA Club Racing, I see SP1/2/3 and Spec Boxster at one end, Cup Cars and GTD at another, and GTB1 in between, without much in terms of competition I'm many of the classes that once used to thrive. I think this ME1 is a great step to build another class for high car counts that slots in performance and cost wise between Spec Boxster and GTB1. I also think that H, I, Spec 996, Spec 997 and Spec Cayman should be rolled up with BOP adjustments made. Roughly 315 HP plus or minus 15, and 3000 pounds plus or minus 150. Between ME1 and this other rolled up class, most of the steel bodies cars (easy to repair) built between 2000 and 2012 would have a class with lots of competition, while still running pump gas and DOT tires to save cost. As to my later suggestion, if one is confident of their driving ability, this should be welcome. Racing against one or two other competitors in class isn't racing. My opinion.
The following users liked this post:
PGas32 (02-07-2023)
Old 02-07-2023, 11:33 AM
  #11  
tgsmith4845
Rennlist Member
 
tgsmith4845's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NorCal
Posts: 798
Received 206 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

I think the main intent of the new ME1 class is to make a new relatively affordable class so more folks can come racing with us. That’s a good thing, especially considering the increasing costs to run a higher end car in PCA CR. Let’s be real; owning a Porsche ain’t the cheapest thing in the world. There are a ton of these 2.7l cars in the US with some being run in DEs and some converted to race cars. Up until now the only option for racing these cars was in the letter classes. PCA CR heard from a bunch of these owners that they’d like to have a class with similar cars so they can all race together, so the idea of a Mid Engine class was born. This new class is designed to capture those cars between the SPB and SPC classes. Hopefully the word will get out to the owners of these cars and attract them to PCA Club Racing.

To a point made earlier, yes, we have a lot of classes in PCA CR and we’re always looking for ways to pare that down. 911Cup is a very positive step in that direction. This ME1 seems like a good way to add one class that captures a lot of cars.

In short, the intent is to open up PCA CR to more Porsche drivers out there. Hoping this is a good way to do that, but who knows. We’ll see if ME1 takes off. Feedback is always appreciated.
The following users liked this post:
Nickshu (02-08-2023)
Old 02-07-2023, 02:23 PM
  #12  
NaroEscape
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NaroEscape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,725
Received 544 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

I don't like it and feel its absolutely unnecessary and here's why:
Right now, if you want to build a mid engine spec car, you have SPB or SPC. SPC is slowly growing, SPB is very established. There are only a finite amount of people that want to go the Spec mid engine route. By having only those two classes, you can decide which direct you want to go and it helps build both classes. Adding ANOTHER class right in the middle will pull potential racers away from either SPB or SPC into this new class. I see it hurting SPC most because it is still growing and trying to establish some level of critical mass.
Also...the leaders in SPB are nipping at the heals of the back of the SPC cars on some tracks. Adding a class in the middle will just confuse things more...

I talked to 3 E guys this past weekend that have cars that would qualify for ME1...none want to participate in it. A few hope it dies on the vine with no participation.
__________________
Bob Saville

Getting You On Track!
www.naroescapemotorsports.com
704-395-2975
  • Data Analysis & Coaching
  • Drivers Gear
  • Crew Gear
  • Car Gear

'07 SPC
'71 914/6 Huey
'04 GT3

The following users liked this post:
RobT 394 (02-08-2023)
Old 02-07-2023, 03:33 PM
  #13  
tgsmith4845
Rennlist Member
 
tgsmith4845's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NorCal
Posts: 798
Received 206 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NaroEscape
I don't like it and feel its absolutely unnecessary and here's why:
Right now, if you want to build a mid engine spec car, you have SPB or SPC. SPC is slowly growing, SPB is very established. There are only a finite amount of people that want to go the Spec mid engine route. By having only those two classes, you can decide which direct you want to go and it helps build both classes. Adding ANOTHER class right in the middle will pull potential racers away from either SPB or SPC into this new class. I see it hurting SPC most because it is still growing and trying to establish some level of critical mass.
Also...the leaders in SPB are nipping at the heals of the back of the SPC cars on some tracks. Adding a class in the middle will just confuse things more...

I talked to 3 E guys this past weekend that have cars that would qualify for ME1...none want to participate in it. A few hope it dies on the vine with no participation.
Huh. Very interesting
Old 02-07-2023, 08:06 PM
  #14  
DDun911
Rennlist Member
 
DDun911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Jersey (Southern)
Posts: 289
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Is affordability the goal we should be chasing.

Not long ago Porsche club could offer some relatively affordable choices to go racing. Now we have AER chump etc . Maybe cheaper should not be the goal.

letter classes have clearly seen there day. Perhaps a performance balancing class for era.
Old 02-08-2023, 01:09 PM
  #15  
rhargy
Rennlist Member
 
rhargy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SE Pa
Posts: 155
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I think it's a good effort for the health of the series.......

1) Our car counts are down markedly over the last couple of years.
2) Track rental costs are up markedly over last year (NJMP raised their rates by about 25%)

Anything to make it more attractive to a broader audience is welcome in my eyes. It's worth a shot. And if it doesn't take off, well at least an effort was made and we know what doesn't work.

PS I don't have a horse in this race, my class is completely unaffected. Just trying to look at the overall picture for PCA club Racing.
The following users liked this post:
tgsmith4845 (02-08-2023)


Quick Reply: New PCA MidEngine class



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:00 AM.