Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why are numbers for racing LOWER??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2024, 10:21 PM
  #181  
RSRRacer
Rennlist Member
 
RSRRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 1,938
Received 175 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FilthyF14
Zone 2 Rep and VIR Club Race Chair here. I appreciate the comments on this forum and the email feedback I've received - it's all helpful. I'm a retired DE guy but not a club racer (one Chump race in my resume but we finished P4!). The reality from a chair position is that the VIR race has made money every year until 2024. Sometimes not a lot but enough to pay the deposits for the next year. It's a huge bet to sign the track contract and commit to hosting a $110K plus event and then keep your fingers crossed that racers show up. Both Sebring and VIR were down about 25% this year.

Changes we're looking at for 2025 include only 2 race groups and adding a second DE group to fill out four run groups. That would work for the 103 cars we had this year. May help with the DE to CR transitioned mentioned in this thread. Expect the SAT dinner to be an optional fee. A driver dinner has always been included in the registration fee but most of you don't show up. 80 of the 100 racers checked the "dinner" box in registration but only 40 showed up. Wasted money - and food. I think the trophies are important - at least to the guys that win them. I've given the 1st place trophy to the same driver every year and it seems he likes picking it up. PCA gives us a stipend to cover part of the trophy cost.

Lastly, sponsors for VIR have been a big challenge. We had one this year. Long story, but Zone 2 won't be hosting VIR in 2025 and still talking to Regions interested in taking over. They should be better suited to find sponsors.

Thanks for the feedback and hope to see you at VIR next year!
Just to clarify - zone 2 hosted many years of profitable club racing at VIR and then after one year of a loss they throw in the towel? Maybe I misinterpreted this post.
Old 04-12-2024, 10:47 PM
  #182  
ExMB
Rennlist Member
 
ExMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,415
Received 1,328 Likes on 808 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RSRRacer
Just to clarify - zone 2 hosted many years of profitable club racing at VIR and then after one year of a loss they throw in the towel? Maybe I misinterpreted this post.
I read it the same way. I don't know how much money they have, get from PCA but asking regions to now take the financial risk ......... It does speak volumes IMHO with the lower participation numbers that are being experienced, reported by others.
Old 04-12-2024, 10:56 PM
  #183  
Pete Debusmann
Rennlist Member
 
Pete Debusmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 362
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

They are not abandoning the race due to the financials. PCA National has said zones cannot host races, it must be a region due to some legal issues. Zone 2 is therefore trying to get a region to take it over so it remains on the schedule. Watkins Glen will/should be similarly affected.
Old 04-12-2024, 11:04 PM
  #184  
Matt Romanowski
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
 
Matt Romanowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 12,484
Received 779 Likes on 507 Posts
Default

There is a legal issue with zones from my memory. Most are not incorporated like a region IIRC.
Old 04-13-2024, 07:49 AM
  #185  
RSRRacer
Rennlist Member
 
RSRRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 1,938
Received 175 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Romanowski
There is a legal issue with zones from my memory. Most are not incorporated like a region IIRC.
Ok this makes sense.
Old 04-13-2024, 09:43 AM
  #186  
RobT 394
Rennlist Member
 
RobT 394's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Smokies
Posts: 717
Received 96 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

But aren't the real answers from the guys who have left? The guys in the paddock are still playing the game.
Susan has every one of our email addresses, past and present drivers (along with medical forms). Surveys can be developed specifically for those that left to better understand why, and what it will take to bring them back. Some focus groups will also be needed. Surveys are only one step in the process. The volunteers and scruts need to be spoken to as well.

​​​​​​​Changes we're looking at for 2025 include only 2 race groups and adding a second DE group to fill out four run groups.
Understand this is reality until we fill the paddock with racers. For some classes more race groups are better. It is never fun to dice it out with the back marker of a faster race class. Some of the best events in the past were Sebring and The Glen where there were four race groups and plenty of people to fill them. This is what we should aspire to.
The following 2 users liked this post by RobT 394:
LuigiVampa (04-13-2024), ProCoach (04-13-2024)
Old 04-13-2024, 10:05 AM
  #187  
LuigiVampa
WRONGLY ACCUSED!
Rennlist Member
 
LuigiVampa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Connecticut Valley Region
Posts: 14,515
Received 3,376 Likes on 1,620 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pete Debusmann
They are not abandoning the race due to the financials. PCA National has said zones cannot host races, it must be a region due to some legal issues. Zone 2 is therefore trying to get a region to take it over so it remains on the schedule. Watkins Glen will/should be similarly affected.
I've read the PCA bylaws and it appears the reason Zones are technically not allowed to host a race is that each Zone representative is appointed by Executive Counsel, and not elected, and only elected PCA officials can incur a debt or obligation on behalf of PCA. Accordingly, because Zone reps are not elected they have no power to enter into a contract on behalf of PCA.

The PCA bylaws, which have not been amended in ten years, could easily be changed to allow for this. It only takes 3% of the membership to propose an amendment and in order not to incur the costs of a separate vote the amendment could be done in conjunction with a general election. The Executive Council has the power to propose amendments as well without the need for 3% of the membership.

Bottom line - instead of pushing the liability to a region PCA could easily give Zones the authority to run races.

Last edited by LuigiVampa; 04-13-2024 at 10:09 AM.
The following 4 users liked this post by LuigiVampa:
Matt Romanowski (04-13-2024), ProCoach (04-13-2024), Veloce Raptor (04-13-2024), will968 (04-13-2024)
Old 04-13-2024, 10:11 AM
  #188  
RobT 394
Rennlist Member
 
RobT 394's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Smokies
Posts: 717
Received 96 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

But this would require change.
The following 3 users liked this post by RobT 394:
LuigiVampa (04-13-2024), tgsmith4845 (04-13-2024), Veloce Raptor (04-13-2024)
Old 04-13-2024, 12:19 PM
  #189  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,636
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

This thread has brought out what racers don't like about PCA Club Racing. Some comments are positive, too, but the overall theme is that drivers are leaving because the racing is better elsewhere.

We don't have solid data on what is declining. The latest PCA CR mag says that 92% of racers re-upped their licenses. That seems like a good number but how many new racers are coming in? More than that, how many races are being entered? I wonder if the larger decline is in racers just entering fewer events each year. Clearly, there are fewer events and lower attendance at most.

Maybe the single-marquee event approach is too limited to provide many races and that driving with another organization is necessary to fill a schedule without traveling 1000s of miles. Then PCA becomes secondary.

If PCA Club Racing is going to stop declining, and even grow, it needs to bring in more drivers and that means new racers from the DE ranks. Pulling in, or back, guys racing P-cars from other leagues works, too.

How many new PCA racers have you met in the last year?
The following users liked this post:
LuigiVampa (04-13-2024)
Old 04-13-2024, 12:27 PM
  #190  
LuigiVampa
WRONGLY ACCUSED!
Rennlist Member
 
LuigiVampa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Connecticut Valley Region
Posts: 14,515
Received 3,376 Likes on 1,620 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GlenL
This thread has brought out what racers don't like about PCA Club Racing. Some comments are positive, too, but the overall theme is that drivers are leaving because the racing is better elsewhere.

We don't have solid data on what is declining. The latest PCA CR mag says that 92% of racers re-upped their licenses. That seems like a good number but how many new racers are coming in? More than that, how many races are being entered? I wonder if the larger decline is in racers just entering fewer events each year. Clearly, there are fewer events and lower attendance at most.

Maybe the single-marquee event approach is too limited to provide many races and that driving with another organization is necessary to fill a schedule without traveling 1000s of miles. Then PCA becomes secondary.

If PCA Club Racing is going to stop declining, and even grow, it needs to bring in more drivers and that means new racers from the DE ranks. Pulling in, or back, guys racing P-cars from other leagues works, too.

How many new PCA racers have you met in the last year?
92% renewal rate is not something to celebrate as anything below 100% indicates a problem.
Old 04-13-2024, 03:44 PM
  #191  
Jas0nn
Pro
 
Jas0nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Canaan, CT
Posts: 695
Received 315 Likes on 154 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GlenL
This thread has brought out what racers don't like about PCA Club Racing. Some comments are positive, too, but the overall theme is that drivers are leaving because the racing is better elsewhere.
That's not my takeaway; it seems to me that the racing is better at PCA and the things that are driving racers away are largely outside the actual racing.

Ask anyone where they'd race instead, and they're ultimately left facing the reality that any other SPRINT racing option will mean significantly LESS racing each weekend! That's a fact.

I choose to read this through an optimistic lens that suggests that this very angle - the amount of racing we get each weekend - could be the strategy that gets people back ... and perhaps even new racers in!
The following users liked this post:
Veloce Raptor (04-13-2024)
Old 04-13-2024, 05:44 PM
  #192  
RSRRacer
Rennlist Member
 
RSRRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 1,938
Received 175 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LuigiVampa
92% renewal rate is not something to celebrate as anything below 100% indicates a problem.
I renewed but have chosen not to race for a few reasons this year. Some due to PCA and some not. Not cost. More personal. So a license renewal data point isn't too meaningful because it's so cheap to renew you'll have a ton of "why not " folks.
The following users liked this post:
LuigiVampa (04-13-2024)
Old 04-13-2024, 06:23 PM
  #193  
Streak
Perfect Angel
Rennlist Member
 
Streak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beyond the Pale
Posts: 7,897
Received 165 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Stubborn leadership has historically been an issue. I've been club racing since 2008 and often times it is made very clear that the concept of a membership driven club is not given much consideration.

For example, when the points championship was implemented I pointed out almost immediately the flaw in the system: only large regions could compete. Really only a handful of racers across the entire country had any shot of winning due to the 10 bonus points. In the very early days of SPB the only regions that had any shot were in Texas and CA.

As a fix I repeatedly emailed that the bonus points should be limited to 5 and points.

After a hard race at WG with DiStefano my trans gave up with 6 minutes to go. Matt earned those points but since I DNF'd he didn't get at least that one. I also suggested that DNF's be counted towards the points.

Fast forward to January of this year and all of a suddenly the bonus points limit is 5 and DNF's are counted. Should have happened years ago but for one bald headed dictator.

And don't get me started on the passing rule. A constant source of conflict that thru sheer obstinance will never ever be clarified. Every other racing organization has a clarified passing rule with established definitions of overlap etc. Every single one.

During a certain bald person's chairmanship you could ask around the paddock and every racer you spoke to would get red in the face and recall a negative experience with said chairman. He was way way out of hand and just belligerent. That was the culture. It's a bad one.

There is no room for that in a member driven club.

None

Last edited by Streak; 04-13-2024 at 06:39 PM.
The following 4 users liked this post by Streak:
Carrera51 (04-15-2024), LuigiVampa (04-13-2024), ProCoach (04-13-2024), Veloce Raptor (04-13-2024)
Old 04-13-2024, 06:35 PM
  #194  
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Guess...
Posts: 41,666
Received 1,434 Likes on 768 Posts
Default

I remember that guy
The following users liked this post:
Streak (04-13-2024)
Old 04-13-2024, 06:38 PM
  #195  
Streak
Perfect Angel
Rennlist Member
 
Streak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beyond the Pale
Posts: 7,897
Received 165 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor
I remember that guy
Kinda set the tone for a long time.

Best thing that ever happened to PCA Club racing was when he retired.

Last edited by Streak; 04-13-2024 at 06:41 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Veloce Raptor (04-13-2024)


Quick Reply: Why are numbers for racing LOWER??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:51 PM.