Why are numbers for racing LOWER??
#241
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by sbelles
So probation could go on for years if you only do a couple of events per year?
#242
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
I for one misunderstood wording thought it was 3 events not races, thanks Frank, does taking the green flag count as a race or do you need to take the checkered?
Rich
Rich
#243
Rennlist Member
One of the most common causes of car to car contact is, imo, the assumption that just because someone has caught the driver ahead of them, they can/will immediately get by. Setting up the pass - understanding where you're faster and how you can time that advantage ...
That's when the real work starts!
That's when the real work starts!
Pretty basic stuff but often missing.
The following 3 users liked this post by RSRRacer:
#244
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#245
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,724
Received 2,886 Likes
on
1,694 Posts
Gussied up 13/13, just with different terms/events. What's missing is the intent of the rule change. Especially ineffective as a deterrent when no one loses championship points except for that incident event RACE. There needs to be a cumulative penalty, with teeth.
The problem was not the old 13/13, watered down as it was.
The problem was the inconsistent (or no) application of it. What's worse was the misapplication of it. Not an isolated occurrence...
A few years ago, a group of professional coaches were asked to review a competitor (competitor A's) video, along with the cars around them, who was hit (with significant and costly damage).
Initially, competitor B was found at fault, at the event. All of the professionals reviewing the video agreed unanimously and without hesitation that that was the correct call.
After the event, competitor B appealed the steward's decision. A higher level of steward not only reversed competitor B's finding of fault, but through a process indecipherable to any of us, found competitor A to be at fault, assigning him a 13 month probation.
Ludicrous.
Don't see how this change will streamline the "determining fault" process on the administrative side OR act as a serious deterrent on the participant side.
The problem was not the old 13/13, watered down as it was.
The problem was the inconsistent (or no) application of it. What's worse was the misapplication of it. Not an isolated occurrence...
A few years ago, a group of professional coaches were asked to review a competitor (competitor A's) video, along with the cars around them, who was hit (with significant and costly damage).
Initially, competitor B was found at fault, at the event. All of the professionals reviewing the video agreed unanimously and without hesitation that that was the correct call.
After the event, competitor B appealed the steward's decision. A higher level of steward not only reversed competitor B's finding of fault, but through a process indecipherable to any of us, found competitor A to be at fault, assigning him a 13 month probation.
Ludicrous.
Don't see how this change will streamline the "determining fault" process on the administrative side OR act as a serious deterrent on the participant side.
__________________
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
Last edited by ProCoach; 04-20-2024 at 01:48 PM.
#246
Rennlist Member
Gussied up 13/13, just with different terms/events. What's missing is the intent of the rule change. Especially ineffective as a deterrent when no one loses championship points except for that incident event RACE. There needs to be a cumulative penalty, with teeth.
The problem was not the old 13/13, watered down as it was.
The problem was the inconsistent (or no) application of it. What's worse was the misapplication of it. Not an isolated occurrence...
A few years ago, a group of professional coaches were asked to review a competitor (competitor A's) video, along with the cars around them, who was hit (with significant and costly damage).
Initially, competitor B was found at fault, at the event. All of the professionals reviewing the video agreed unanimously and without hesitation that that was the correct call.
After the event, competitor B appealed the steward's decision. A higher level of steward not only reversed competitor B's finding of fault, but through a process indecipherable to any of us, found competitor A to be at fault, assigning him a 13 month probation.
Ludicrous.
Don't see how this change will streamline the "determining fault" process on the administrative side OR act as a serious deterrent on the participant side.
The problem was not the old 13/13, watered down as it was.
The problem was the inconsistent (or no) application of it. What's worse was the misapplication of it. Not an isolated occurrence...
A few years ago, a group of professional coaches were asked to review a competitor (competitor A's) video, along with the cars around them, who was hit (with significant and costly damage).
Initially, competitor B was found at fault, at the event. All of the professionals reviewing the video agreed unanimously and without hesitation that that was the correct call.
After the event, competitor B appealed the steward's decision. A higher level of steward not only reversed competitor B's finding of fault, but through a process indecipherable to any of us, found competitor A to be at fault, assigning him a 13 month probation.
Ludicrous.
Don't see how this change will streamline the "determining fault" process on the administrative side OR act as a serious deterrent on the participant side.
The 13/13 appeal process is shrouded in mystery, often coming down to just one steward making the ultimate decision, a decision which itself is not open to appeal.
The following users liked this post:
ProCoach (04-23-2024)
#247
I think the answer might be to get the racers to self-police some of this stuff by rating your fellow in-class drivers and having that count towards your point total. If you drove like an a-hole all season (cheated up too?) then you’ll never get to be champ. If you get people to respect each other and the rules, then most of these problems could be solved without stewards. It gives racers a say, and encourages people to get along. You can also look at every blown flag and complaint and subtract that from the score.
The following users liked this post:
ProCoach (04-22-2024)
#249
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Nizer
Why is this not obvious to everyone involved in officiating PCA races? It's not complicated.
The following users liked this post:
skeeler (05-01-2024)
#250
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,724
Received 2,886 Likes
on
1,694 Posts
Yep, and as I know from being a large support shop in the past, there is not a small amount of influence wielded by those folks as well, sometimes to the detriment of the other drivers…
#251
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Would it be possible to establish an individual race review committee at each event, composed of PCA racers not doing the event but call that track home say a comittee of 3 so no ties and no agenda other than safe racing.
just a thought
Rich
just a thought
Rich