SPB for NASA ST5?
#1
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
SPB for NASA ST5?
Anyone know of any SPBs running in ST5? Looks like we would slot in nicely at a low 14 for adjusted wt/power running Toyo RR 245s and leaving everything else in SPB format. Just curious as there is a NASA event at Barber next month and I live 5 minutes away.
#2
Rennlist Member
W/O doing much in the way of calculations - seemed like it was to much of a stretch to get to ST5, may have to revisit it though as we're up to ~7 cars locally and building.
#3
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
From https://form.jotform.com/drivenasa/s...ification-form
I just searched the NASA ST compliance database, looks like there are 8 986's across the country running in ST5.
I just searched the NASA ST compliance database, looks like there are 8 986's across the country running in ST5.
Last edited by Lemming; 07-01-2020 at 03:19 PM.
#4
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Regional GTS1 class is an option
In our NASA region no one was running GTS1. So director agreed to let us run as GTS1 class but Spec Boxster rules. With the exception of you could run Hoosiers for contingency and up to 15mm rear spaces. We regularly have 6 to 8 cars running in Rocky Mountain region.
GTS is no contact similar to PCA.
GTS is no contact similar to PCA.
#5
Drifting
From https://form.jotform.com/drivenasa/s...ification-form
I just searched the NASA ST compliance database, looks like there are 8 986's across the country running in ST5.
I just searched the NASA ST compliance database, looks like there are 8 986's across the country running in ST5.
So if I read this right -- my fat **** and cadillac of a SPB are perfect for ST5 -- I'm consistently 2720 +/- 5lbs
Now I just need to rescue my rig from NOLA quarantine.
Mike
#6
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
#7
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
In our NASA region no one was running GTS1. So director agreed to let us run as GTS1 class but Spec Boxster rules. With the exception of you could run Hoosiers for contingency and up to 15mm rear spaces. We regularly have 6 to 8 cars running in Rocky Mountain region.
GTS is no contact similar to PCA.
GTS is no contact similar to PCA.
Trending Topics
#8
Burning Brakes
I just ran ST5 in Nasa Mid-Atlantic. Front Runner's are running right around mid 1:24's at Summit. This was my first time out in the SBP car, so I'm not up to speed, but looking at last year's club race results the lead boxsters were running the same times as this.
#9
Rennlist Member
I helping a friend build an ST5 Boxster. The 255 Toyos on rear OEM wheels fit the 257mm template, so no need to go to the 245's. Add a wing and a splitter, and it could be competitive. The average HP calculation makes a pretty big difference with the somewhat peaky 2.5, so that leaves some room to take the aero penalty. First weekend out with the car, about 200lbs overweight (passenger seat, full tank, and little lightweighting done), it was well within 2 seconds of the track record in ST5 at Gingerman. There is time left in the car and driver. It should be pretty competitive in ST5.
#10
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
I helping a friend build an ST5 Boxster. The 255 Toyos on rear OEM wheels fit the 257mm template, so no need to go to the 245's. Add a wing and a splitter, and it could be competitive. The average HP calculation makes a pretty big difference with the somewhat peaky 2.5, so that leaves some room to take the aero penalty. First weekend out with the car, about 200lbs overweight (passenger seat, full tank, and little lightweighting done), it was well within 2 seconds of the track record in ST5 at Gingerman. There is time left in the car and driver. It should be pretty competitive in ST5.
#12
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
So, it appears that I need to do nothing to the car, I can run it exactly like SPB, and be ST5 compliant. In fact, I can reduce my weight by a few pounds, or add a bit of weight and add some downforce. Max HP was what was expecting (192), and as Doc stated, the HP curve is peaky so using the average HP, it drops quite a few HP (184). Great to have another option and I'm hopeful that the SPB will be competitive. I'll find out in a few weeks.
The following users liked this post:
martt1ski (07-13-2020)
#13
Rennlist Member
So, it appears that I need to do nothing to the car, I can run it exactly like SPB, and be ST5 compliant. In fact, I can reduce my weight by a few pounds, or add a bit of weight and add some downforce. Max HP was what was expecting (192), and as Doc stated, the HP curve is peaky so using the average HP, it drops quite a few HP (184). Great to have another option and I'm hopeful that the SPB will be competitive. I'll find out in a few weeks.
#14
Rennlist Member
Lemming - Thanks for your work on this - we are seeing the same potential over here (Intermountain) and may get the local group to move from GTS2 to ST5. Look forward to hearing about your results. We have no ST5 in the region at the moment - of any kind. That said - there are existing UMC track records for that class, so ST5 has been run here, previously.
I’m in TT4 right now - probably should try to reclass down to TT5. Again I thought I was prohibited by points.
#15
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
This is really interesting. I had previously concluded we couldn’t run ST5 due to points despite the great P/W match for our cars... obviously I need to check again.
I’m in TT4 right now - probably should try to reclass down to TT5. Again I thought I was prohibited by points.
I’m in TT4 right now - probably should try to reclass down to TT5. Again I thought I was prohibited by points.